• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline Descartes' views on the topic of Philosophy of Mind.

Extracts from this document...


Philosophy of Mind > Rene Descartes Outline Descartes' views on the topic of Philosophy of Mind Descartes has indeeed made some notable contributions towards the philosophy of mind. It is the aim of this essay to discuss these contributions. Descartes is well known for being an avid dualist. This is the view that the mind and body are understood to be seperate and distinct from each other, but in some way causally connected. Descartes was no exception and believed the mind and body to be two completely different substances. He defines the body as an extended, non-thinking substance and the mind as a non-extended, thinking sunstance. But it not just these definitions that allow Descartes to adopt a dualistic point of view. Descartes came to the conclusion in meditation I of his discourse of method that any data received from the senses could be doubted and therefore unreliable. As the body is known only through the senses, Descartes was able to doubt the existence of such a body and all other bodies for that. ...read more.


Infact for Descartes the mind is primary and if a question of identity should arise the mind should be associated as the 'self'. He argues that even if he didn't have a body he would essentially be the same as long as he had his mind with all the correct falculties intact. But Descartes went further than this and defined the fundamental element of the mind and his existence as the ability to think. As long as Descartes continued to think he would continue to exist. It is in meditation II that this line of thinking emerges and lead Descartes to his famous maxim, "cogito ergo sum" or in English "I think there I am." This maxim is free from universal doubt and is always necessarily true whenever the thought is conceived. It's truth depends not on any sensory data but rather a cognitive process of the mind and therefore expresses the indubitability of one's own reality. With the certainty of his existence established Descartes continues to question his identity (eg: what exactly this 'I' is that exists). ...read more.


And as mathematics is known a priori through the mind alone, it follows these geometrical shapes are also known by the mind alone. Here the true nature of bodies is understood by pure thought alone. It is in meditation VI where Descartes is able to convince himself of the existence of other bodies. Firstly he concludes that it is coherent enough for such bodies to exist as they are in a geometircal form. Second, the fact that our imagination is directed towards the ideas of bodies, means it is possible that such bodies exist. Finally, the faculty of sense perception is an entirely passive ability to receive ideas of physical objects. As one does not have any control over such ideas, it follows that the ideas must be produced by some external source (ie: a body itself). Descartes also suggests that other bodies must exist if a non-deceiving God exists. For a non-deceiving god wouldn't allow Descartes to believe that something exists if infact it wasn't real. As to whether Descartes believes other minds exist is a question left unanswered. This is probably due to the fact that one can only ever have direct access to one mind (their own), and therefore can only be sure of the existence of one mind. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Descartes Meditations

    An omnipotent God could make even our conception of mathematics false. One might argue that God is supremely good and would not lead him to believe falsely all these things. But by this reasoning we should think that God would not deceive her with regard to anything, and yet this is clearly not true.

  2. Evaluate Descartes Method of Doubt

    Whether that is a valid assessment or not is questionable, and will be later in the essay. Descartes first wave of doubt concerns sensory fallibility. Descartes states that 'everything I have accepted.... I have learned from or through the senses.'

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Hume fork implies that you can't deductively prove anything about the world, and this objects to Descartes Ontological argument. However Kant objects to Hume's 'fork' because he claims that there are synthetic priori truths. Kant claims that you know a priori that your experiences will always have certain general properties,

  2. A Critical Analysis of Lao Tzu's Tao Teh Ching - Chineses philosophy.

    Rather, it is an assumption of this essay that philosophy has certain universal characteristics: it is characterised by being reflective, normative, critical, rational and systematic way of thinking.5 Kwame Gyekye explains in his book Tradition and Modernity: Philosophical Reflections on the African Experience: "A close examination of the nature and

  1. Introduction to Philosophy.

    * Thales of Miletus said that basics stuff is water. So One can say that the primary substance in this theory is WATER. Many philosophers asked a common question, that is they asked ? WHAT is reality. Three of these philosophers are : 1.

  2. The Search for Certainty - Descartes, Meditations.

    This can lead to errors in knowledge. Malcolm argued against Descartes' dream argument by stating that in order to question the state of one's consciousness one must be in a state of wakefulness.

  1. Why does the mind and body problem still exist?

    It was Thomas Huxley (1895) who coined the term in an article he wrote for the fortmightly review of 1874. in so doing Huxley willingly sacrificed the notion of "free will" as an illusion despite its deep embedment in our language and common sense.

  2. Philosophers Views on Miracles Essay

    David Hume who is an empiricist defined a miracle as ?a transgression of a law of nature by a particular violation of the deity or by the interposition of some invisible agent?. David Hume who is a sceptic, appeals to people?s common sense and believed that it was not reasonable

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work