• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline one version of the design argument for the existence of God

Extracts from this document...


Outline one version of the design argument for the existence of God For centuries the philosophical debate for and against the existence of god has raged. The Teleological argument (another name for the design argument) attempts to prove the existence of the God through the order and purpose exhibited within nature and the universe as a whole. The word Teleological comes from the Greek teleos meaning end or purpose, hence the Teleological argument uses the universe as a basis for arguing for the existence of god. This argument is a rich a posteriori, inductive, analogical argument using natural theology. Different people's perceptions of god are very different. Those from other cultures and traditions will each have conflicting ideas about this "god". With the design argument are we trying to prove the existence of Plato's demiurge or perhaps the Roman polytheist "committee of gods"? No, we are providing proof (or not) for the existence of the god of classical theism, that is to say a monotheist, omnipresent, omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent, immutable, eternal god who created the universe ex nihilo, out of nothing. It is important to remember that this is theistic idea the Teleological argument is looking at. The design argument is the third of the five classical theistic proofs, but is probably the most easily understood. The basic principles of the design argument have been taken-up, adapted and regurgitated by many philosophers throughout the ages, each of who developed their own individual versions. Perhaps one of the earliest being Cicero with de Natura Deorum in which the character Lucilius looks up to the sky and asks, "What could be more clear or obvious when we look up to the sky and contemplate the heavens, that there is some divinity of superior intelligence?" ...read more.


The watch has an intelligent designer and so by the rules of analogy we can say the world has a designer. The watch and the world are similar but not identical, just as the watchmaker and world maker at similar but not identical. The Teleological design argument is a very simple argument to understand, when compared with the other four classical theist proofs it seems very "user-friendly" and accessible. Unlike the Cosmological and Ontological arguments, the Teleological argument can be understood with relatively little explanation. If I were, for instance, to outline the basic ideas of the design argument to a primary school child they would probably be able to understand without too much difficulty. One of the reasons it is so easy to understand is that it makes use of everyday objects, we can identify with the design argument more easily because we all know what a pocket watch looks like, what it does and have a vague idea of how it works. The use of analogy makes it vivid within out minds. Another informal characteristic of the Teleological design argument is that it captures our imagination whether we are looking at it from a scientific or religious perspective. In his essay "Design Argument" Colin Crowder says, "It can capitalise on moods as distinct as scientific curiousity and religious awe." If we are scientists we do not dismiss it for being overtly religious and faith-based in its outlook. Although the argument claims to use natural theology, that is, arguing for the existence of god through unaided human reason, it appeals to our religious awe because the argument celebrates the achievements of god (but only if we are theists). ...read more.


As is obvious, this simply doesn't work. We cannot jump from most other universes to ours quite simply because we do not have knowledge of other universes. Secondly, and more fundamentally the definition of the word universe is "all" it meanings literally everything. It is logically impossible for there to be more that one universe because the universe is everything, if there were a multitude of universes then each could not be "all". We must state the Design Argument analogically then, if it is to make sense. To talk about the universe as a whole, the only solution is to find something similar which we have knowledge of. Paley chooses the example of a watch. The watch and universe are analogous because both exhibit elements of order and purpose. Using the principle that similar effects have similar causes, we know that the watch was designed by an intelligent designer and so from this statement we can move to another stating that the order and purpose within the universe are the products of intelligent design also. There is one fundamental difference, that of scale. However, the rules of analogy state that the two objects do not have to be identical only similar, the analogy is drawing out the similarities between the two. To quote Colin Crowder again, this "analogical reasoning is weaker than straightforward inductive reasoning: it forces us to deal with two classes of things rather than one". Yet as I have shown, this is the only way of stating the argument because we do not have complete knowledge of the universe as a whole. To conclude, Paley's version of the Teleological Argument is an inductive, analogical, rich a posteriori argument. It uses Natural Theology, i.e. using unaided human reason, to argue for the existence of the god of classical theism. ?? ?? ?? ?? 02/05/07 Alice Ambrose Smith: The Teleological Argument Page1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The design argument is also known as the teleological argument. The argument looks at ...

    3 star(s)

    This argument is Design qua purpose. Paley argued that the way that each aspect of the natural world appears to fulfil its purpose is further evidence of design. Paley therefore argues for a Designing creator - God. Paley goes on to argue that there is further evidence for a creator God in the regularity of the universe.

  2. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    This does not discount the teleological argument as who designed the world initially and the humans in which to care for it? If the universe didn't fit together then it simply would not be a universe. The theory of Epicurean Hypothesis states that infinite particles all in motion must eventually

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Aquinas, for example, says that there cannot be an infinite series of causes.52 They have also asked how can the cosmological argument avoid contradicting itself. If, for example, nothing causes itself how can there be a first cause which does not itself require a cause other than itself?53 Though this could be debated.

  2. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    But because we can imagine it existing then it must exist. This argument on the outset appears to be strong; however, it has its flaws. First, the argument relies on us acknowledging the God is the greatest conceivable being and that the it posses necessary existence.

  1. summary of the design argument

    Yet plants and animals are non-rational beings, something or someone must be directing them to their goal. To summarise, Aquinas demonstrates how the design argument is strong because, there is clear undoubted, beneficial order in the world which could not be by chance or intelligence of that being, the being must by directed by something of intelligence.

  2. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    This undermines, then, the Cosmological strength in that God is a complete and sufficient explanation for the universe as we can never know what actually is a sufficient explanation, and therefore, we cannot conclude that God be the whole explanation to the universe.

  1. Explain the cosmological argument for existence of God

    Russell believed that the universe was a "Brute Fact" and it was "just there, and that's all there is to say about it." Although the Universe is "there" it doesn't mean it had a beginning. Modern scientists say that Aquinas' argument rests on the assumption no longer necessarily holds true that is "Everything must have a cause.

  2. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    It is true that every human being has a mother, but it is a fallacy to apply to this to the whole race of human beings, and claim that the human beings as whole have a mother; it is unreasonable to move from individual causes to causes of totality.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work