• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the cosmological argument for the existance of God. and plan.

Extracts from this document...


Outline the cosmological argument for the existence of God. (15 marks) The cosmological argument is one that attempts to prove the existence of God through a series of a posteriori (arguments made from experience of the universe) cases describing the necessity for a first creator. The argument is inductive, meaning that it rests on the notion that if its premises are true then it is unlikely that the conclusion will be false. The cosmological argument must and can only explain the universe in terms that a limited human mind can understand. Its based on the idea that everything is contingent and has a creator or beginning somewhere. Thomas Aquinas used the cosmological argument in three of his five ways to prove the existence of God. His first way was called the 'first mover' argument. This argues that everything that has motion must be in time, because to move from one thing or state to another time must have passed. This means that everything that is in time has a mover (something that first caused it to move) and that in turn has a mover etc... but that this chain of mover and moved cannot go back forever and their must be a mover outside of time which caused the first event which then in turn caused the rest. ...read more.


mover things cant go back 4eva infinite regress is impossible 2) causer cannot cause itself or come before itself 3) contingency (necessary being) kalam roots in ara bic philosophy William laine craig actual infinites (a beginning less series of events in time) creator of the world must be personal BOOKCASE!!!!!!! Greek philosophy leibnich What are the main criticisms of the cosmological argument? How for is it fair to say that the strengths of the argument outweigh its weaknesses? (15 marks) The cosmological argument can be seen as a strong argument because it is a posteriori, meaning it's based on personal experience, and therefore available information that has been on mass witnessed and approved by the vast majority of people (for example the common consensus that there are natural laws, and we understand the way they work). Swinburne argues from the perspective of an argument called Ockham's razor (called so because it was a point first raised by a man called Ockham, and the argument is sharp and concise like a razor). This argument simply says that God is the simplest explanation for the universe. Unfortunately many would disagree by saying that at face value this may be so but in depth the presence of a classical theistic God causes too many problems and denying God is a simpler explanation. ...read more.


It could be said though that as there are many arguments for the existence of God, together they build a strong argument for the cosmological argument. This being said many weak arguments do not necessarily create one strong argument but are more likely to create a large but still weak argument. This suggests that both sides of the argument have their faults but I do not think that the as a whole the cosmological argument can be said to provide a truly satisfactory answer to the problem of God and the universe. Timed. PLAN strengths it's a posteriori so based on available information swinburnes ockhams razor it's the easiest to state. Leibniz must be a reason that is god . support mackies railway train weaknesses Hume why must the universe have a beginning may not be the ctg may just be some lesser deity coulsons god of the gaps kant the universes rules can only be applied to that in our experience not what is outside of it (ie god) russels brute fact, mother theory conclusion subjectivity its based on weather u ask why otherwise its invalid increases probability?? my opinion. ?? ?? ?? ?? Charlotte Rowe 12Rog Religious Studies Cosmological essay. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christianity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Christianity essays

  1. Outline the cosmological argument for the existence of God.

    Plato posited a basic argument in The Laws in which he argued that motion in the world and the Cosmos was "imparted motion" that required some kind of "self-originated motion" to set it in motion and to maintain that motion.

  2. The controversy that is evolution. I shall start with the argument against evolution.

    They believe that the universe and earth was created 10,000 years ago, and that the earth was inundated by Noah's flood and that all living things were created by God to reproduce after the kind, thus setting limits on evolution.


    Law of the Torah but rather a law of love; "You, my brothers, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge the sinful nature; rather, serve one another in love. "(Galatians 5 v 13)

  2. Examine the main ideas and strengths of the design argument for the existence of ...

    This also claims that the analogy doesn't lead to God but maybe a limited imperfect being. Payley's argument is inductive and it has its strengths because it is a reasonable interpretation of existence and easily understandable. Hume's argument does offer a strong counter attack to Paley's theory so Hume's argument

  1. Free essay

    RS Cosmological Essay

    P2: The universe is an event. Conclusion: God is the first cause of the universe. If we accept these two premises, then it may be that we will consider the conclusion to be at least probable, if we have good reasons to think that God is a likely, or even most likely, cause of its existence.

  2. Assess the ontological argument

    He believed this is because there can be nothing contained in a definition that tells us anything about its existence in reality. He then went on to make a second criticism which was based on the definition of a predicate itself.

  1. God is responsible for everything that happens in the Universe. Discuss.

    Augustine explained in his work, On Free Choice of the Will, that free will was a necessity. If God did not give humans free will, then all punishment or reward would be unjust as humans did not really make any decision.

  2. Covenants between Man and God in the Bible

    We can also see the unconditional nature of this covenant when Jesus says about his sheep, "No one can snatch them out of my hand... No one can snatch them out of my Father's hand" (John 10:28-29). New Covenant provided Gentiles an unconditional means for salvation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work