• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...


The Cosmological Argument Q: Outline the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God. The Cosmological argument is an argument that starts from the existence of the universe, and from this attempts to prove the existence of God. The argument is a posteriori, i.e. it draws on experience from the material world. It is important to state that the most this argument can hope to prove is that there exists a necessary being who caused everything in the universe; it cannot arrive at the Judaic-Christian conception of God (i.e. an omnipotent, omniscient and all loving being). The Cosmological Argument is mainly attributed to St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), although may well have originated from Platonic or Aristotelian ideas. The argument is also known as 'Aquinas third way'; the argument from contingency and necessity. Aquinas was already a firm believer, and so it is not entirely clear what the purpose of the arguments were; i.e. whether they were designed as a basis for faith, or as a reinforcement of faith. Aquinas starts his argument with what he considers to be a universal truth; that all things in the world come into and go out of existence, that they are contingent or depend upon other factors for their existence. ...read more.


This leads to the conclusion that there must be some being 'having of itself its own necessity', a being that is de re necessary. The ultimate conclusion is that this 'being' is what everyone calls God. Q: What are the strengths and weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument? There are many weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument as well as some strengths. The first question that has to be overcome before the Cosmological Argument can be successful (or even applicable), is; 'why does there have to be a cause for the universe?' If the answer to this question is ' there doesn't, the universe is just there', then the argument is useless. However, this is not a weakness in the argument itself and so will not be treated as such. The first and best strength of the Cosmological argument is that it starts from the seemingly indisputable fact that the universe exists. The argument also follows a logical form, guaranteeing a successful outcome, provided that the premises are true. However, this is where the strengths of the argument seem to end. ...read more.


A further weakness of the argument is whether or not the principal of sufficient reason is correct or not. Why should it be any more probable that there is a necessary cause than an infinite regression? I do not believe that this question can be answered. Immanuel Kant also criticised the Cosmological Argument as he held that it is impossible to speculate about something that lives outside space and time when we are confined to the limits of them. The final criticism that I will mention is the same as I mentioned at he beginning of this essay; that this argument is incapable of arriving at the existence of many peoples conception of God; that at best it can only prove the existence of a necessary being. The cosmological argument is, in my opinion, incredibly weak. I have only mentioned a few of the arguments against the Cosmological Argument and yet all of the strengths (that I can think of). I believe that the argument is out of date in the light of recent discoveries. However, despite this, considering the lack of knowledge of Aquinas it is of very logical form and may have been far more persuasive at the time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain the cosmological argument for existence of God

    This argument has the following logical structure: Everything that has a beginning of its existence has a cause of its existence.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Therefore, all things cannot be contingent. Corollary to this is the conclusion that there must then be such a thing as a necessary existence.16 Aquinas furthers his premise by supposing that there is a hierarchy of being with necessary existence, each lower being dependent upon the higher to infinity.

  1. St Thomas Aquinas and the Cosmological Argument

    He argues that the Universe is neither contingent nor non-contingent. "I should say that the Universe is just there, and that is all" Copleston argued that this was tantamount to refusing to sit down at the chess-game in order to avoid being beaten.

  2. The Cosmological Argument

    With the Kalam cosmological argument, however, it is precisely because the universe is thought to have a beginning in time that the existence of the universe is thought to stand in need of explanation The crucial premise of the Kalam cosmological argument, then, is the second: "The universe has a beginning of its existence".

  1. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of - The Thomist Cosmological Argument of the Existence ...

    Although the argument doesn't point to the classical theism of God; whether or not someone believes in the cosmological argument depends on the faith that they already have. The argument will appear more convincing to the theist who already believes in a God, than the atheist who does not.

  2. Examine the strength of the cosmological argument for the existence of god

    This argument results to a God every time. Overall, Aquinas believes that the Universe is dependant on a God for its continued existence 'A play only lasts as long as the actor keeps acting' Richard Swinburne is in favour of the probability argument.

  1. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    to exist, the conclusion like a syllogism, is inferred from the premises: the universe must have had a cause for its existence, so far it has retained the form and structure of a syllogism. However it then goes on to assert: that the cause of the universe is the one

  2. i) Outline the key features of the cosmological argument ii) To what extent is ...

    It is concluded that, the external cause must be God, as God is eternal and therefore does not require a cause for his existence. The cosmological argument also argues that infinite regress is impossible as it would mean no ultimate cause, in which case the universe never existed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work