• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the key ideas of the Teleological argument and identify at least two if its strengths.

Extracts from this document...


Outline the key ideas of the Teleological argument and identify at least two if its strengths. The teleological argument (also called design argument) is an a posteriori argument from the order in the universe to the existence of God. The name "the teleological argument" is derived from the Greek word teleos, meaning "end" or "purpose". When such arguments speak of the universe being ordered, they mean that it is ordered towards some end or purpose. The suggestion is that it is more plausible to suppose that the universe is so because it was created by an intelligent being in order to accomplish that purpose than it is to suppose that it is this way by chance. The argument states that if one uses one's senses to look at order, such as gravity and the motion of the planets, which exists in the world, it is likely that one will accept that there is a designer God who created the world and gave it this order. ...read more.


Paley states that if one were crossing a heath and saw a stone, one would not question its existence, as it is just a stone which could have been there forever. However, if one came across a watch, one would be able to see that all of the cogs and hands worked together intricately for the purpose of telling the time. This would, Paley argues, lead one to believe that the watch must have been carefully put together by a human watchmaker. With this theory applied to earth, he stated that the intricacies of the world pointed to an intelligent creator. As well as examining the purpose of the world, Paley also looks at its order and regularity, thus his argument is also one of Design Qua Regularity. Paley argues that as the cogs and hands of the watch move in an orderly way to tell the time, so the world has order in order to enable life. ...read more.


It looks at the purposes that every part of the world has (for example trees take in carbon dioxide and release oxygen that we breathe) and from these purpose serving things in the world, the argument states it was placed there by a creator to serve this purpose. The Design Argument has also been reformulated in modern times by Richard Swinburne. Swinburne's two versions of the argument can be found in his book, "The Existence of God." The first of these arguments is the Argument from Spatial Order, which examines the complexities of the world and uses these to point to the existence of God. This version uses the Anthropic Principle to argue that the order of the world and the scientific laws which allow for the conditions of life need to be explained. Swinburne, using Ockham's Razor, states that the simplest and therefore best explanation for this order is that God created the world. "The probability of order of the right kind is very much greater if there is a God, and so, the existence of such order adds greatly to the probability that there is a God." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Why there is something rather than nothing also requires a sufficient reason to explain why it should be so. Everything in the world requires a reason for its existence, since nothing happens without a reason. But everything in the world can be explained with reference to something else within the

  2. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    This is explained by Paley as machines not all being perfect and failing to work sometimes. The fact the world isn't perfect doesn't prove that there isn't a designer. This is a valid point however if you make this assumption that sometimes things go wrong then it would suggest that

  1. What are they key features of the design argument for the existence of God?

    This creates a whole host of problems with the main thrust being that with all of the features of bad design that we find, any designer or 'blind watchmaker' as Richard Dawkins put it, would possibly have to be either not wholly good or not wholly powerful.

  2. Writing to argue.

    * Acknowledge opposing views but sensitively refute them and show how your view is best. * Add power to your argument by using "rhetorical devices". HERE ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF "RHETORICAL DEVICES" Rhetorical questions, similes, metaphors, emotive language (use with care!), irony (but never sarcasm!), "lists of three", repetition, hyperbole (exaggeration for effect), humour, anecdotes, and so on.

  1. Key Features of the Teleological Arguement

    Therefore, the world must have been created by means of intelligent design. These analogies are used to prove that God exists by using the analogies to prove that every design has a designer , just like the world was created by God.

  2. Examine the key ideas and strengths of the design argument for the existence of ...

    He stated that this order cannot happen by chance but designed, by an intelligent Being. For ex; a small baby learning to walk and the mother (intelligent being) directing the baby on how to walk. Aquinas suggests that the universe is complex but works with regularity and in harmony.

  1. Aquinas and his version on the Teleological Argument

    So everything in nature which is moving but has no intelligence has to be directed by god. Aquinas claimed that there is order and purpose in the world, but he said that objects which are inanimate(lifeless such the planets), could not have been ordered themselves, as they do not have any intelligence with which to make the plans or patterns.

  2. Outline the key ideas of the design argument.

    It had a creator; the watch had a watch maker, so therefore the universe must have an all powerful creator as the universe is so perfectly created and it can?t have got here by chance. Paley uses the principle of like causes to like effects, what is true of human design is also true of the world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work