• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

Extracts from this document...


Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God There is a problem that arises when talking about God, e.g. "I love my dog, and my dog loves me." There is a flaw in this statement as you would not be able to ask my dog in conversation about its love for me because the only being that we have the capacity of talking to is each other (humans). So if I were to say, "I love God, God loves me." I reach a brick wall with this statement and I will show you in this essay that it could be possible to try and give proof of God's existence using the teleological argument. The word Teleological comes from the Greek word "telos", which means end or purpose. The question of design provides a strong argument because the arguments start from the world, so they start from experience to argue in favour of God's existence, so the argument is an a posteriori. The argument also holds order, regularity and purpose that can be observed in the universe. This kind of complexity could show proof of design. There are two main examples of design put forward by William Paley and Thomas Aquinas. ...read more.


The question of design seems to cohere with our everyday life and experiences of the world and universe. It is, as Conway Morris (atheist) puts very fittingly, "evolution is almost eerily well suited", which would pose a question to weather everything is just a product of chance or there is structure to everything. Design seems to fit in quite well with science in this case because it has been scientists such as Behe and Dembski that have discovered the amazing complexity of evolution. Do the strengths outweigh the weaknesses of the argument? One of the greatest weaknesses of the teleological argument is that fact that Paley uses analogy to explain the proof of God. He makes it unclear if he refers to the whole universe when talking about the watch, or just very small aspects of it. Hume says that when talking about the universe, you would have to look at the universe as a whole, outside of it. Also we don't know of any other universes so we don't know how a universe would be designed and concludes that you cant make a leap of logic from how it would be designed to the universe's actuality. ...read more.


If Richard Dawkins were to be asked by a critique of his work, like Paley for instance, he would say "A mystery? Maybe, but we just have to work on it!" This is a similar statement to Conway Morris and is another unsatisfying answer for a question that these scientists are so sure is correct. Hume has made many criticisms but they seem to be flawed in some ways. He says that we should compare the universe to something like an animal but an argument could be made that the universe is not like an animal but something far greater. He said that if we cant see something then it isn't worth talking about. He then is almost inferring that there is chance of design, which could contradict his argument greatly. I think that given all this evidence for and against God and the Design argument, they must all be considered before a decision should be made. Paley and Aquinas present the argument very skilfully but its flaws are exploited by the likes of Mill, Darwin, Dawkins and Hume. I can't say that the strengths outweigh the weaknesses because they balance each other out too much to make a valid judgement. Philosophy of Religion Essay - The Design Argument Matthew Oliver 1 17/05/2008 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the design argument for the existence of God.

    4 star(s)

    For people like Paley, the complex features of different plants and animals provide clear evidence and understanding of a divine designer. According to Darwin's theory of evolution, the different species around today have not always existed in their present for.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The design argument is also known as the teleological argument. The argument looks at ...

    3 star(s)

    Furthermore, Hume argued that we cannot conclude from the fact that example of order in the universe have human causes that order in the universe as a whole has a cause, because the universe is unique. Therefore the analogy doesn't work because we have no way of knowing whether order

  1. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the teleological, deontological and hybrid systems of ethics ...

    For example, this system, unlike the teleological one, is not flexible, and can therefore result in consequences which may be morally wrong, such as the use of cloning to discover medical cures for fatal diseases, which this system would not allow as embryos would be killed, and therefore the action

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    come into existence without a cause.42 Though why say that the cause of existing things does not require a cause of its existence? If it is reasonable to assert that there is a cause of the existence of thing, is it not reasonable to ask 'What causes the existence of the cause of the existing things?'

  1. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    We largely apply the harm principle, at least in as much as the only grounds for sending someone to prison is if they are deemed to constitute a threat to society. And whilst we are still to some extent restricted on what we do to our own bodies, in the

  2. Explain the Copplestone-Russell Radio Debate

    But when is an explanation adequate? Suppose I am about to make a flame with a match. You may say that the adequate explanation of that is that I rub it on the box. However Copplestone concluded that an adequate explanation is one which "nothing more can be added."

  1. The religious experience argument is the most convincing proof for the existence of God. ...

    The third private religious experience is when an individual reflects upon their life and concludes that God was in fact guiding them. These categories agree with the above statement as they emphasise the fact that many people have religious experiences thus there is no real lack of evidence in this sense.

  2. Introduction to Philosophy.

    > Only the Gods ideas and forms > People > Objective truth > It is subject to change > Can be destroyed > Objects/ reality in this world : It is made of appearances and revelations. There is sense- appearance and one has to keep in mind that we are living in an imagery world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work