Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God There is a problem that arises when talking about God, e.g. "I love my dog, and my dog loves me." There is a flaw in this statement as you would not be able to ask my dog in conversation about its love for me because the only being that we have the capacity of talking to is each other (humans). So if I were to say, "I love God, God loves me." I reach a brick wall with this statement and I will show you in this essay that it could be possible to try and give proof of God's existence using the teleological argument. The word Teleological comes from the Greek word "telos", which means end or purpose. The question of design provides a strong argument because the arguments start from the world, so they start from experience to argue in favour of God's existence, so the argument is an a posteriori. The argument also holds order, regularity and purpose that can be observed in the universe. This kind of complexity could show proof of design. There are two main examples of design put forward by William Paley and Thomas Aquinas.

Middle

The question of design seems to cohere with our everyday life and experiences of the world and universe. It is, as Conway Morris (atheist) puts very fittingly, "evolution is almost eerily well suited", which would pose a question to weather everything is just a product of chance or there is structure to everything. Design seems to fit in quite well with science in this case because it has been scientists such as Behe and Dembski that have discovered the amazing complexity of evolution. Do the strengths outweigh the weaknesses of the argument? One of the greatest weaknesses of the teleological argument is that fact that Paley uses analogy to explain the proof of God. He makes it unclear if he refers to the whole universe when talking about the watch, or just very small aspects of it. Hume says that when talking about the universe, you would have to look at the universe as a whole, outside of it. Also we don't know of any other universes so we don't know how a universe would be designed and concludes that you cant make a leap of logic from how it would be designed to the universe's actuality.

Conclusion

If Richard Dawkins were to be asked by a critique of his work, like Paley for instance, he would say "A mystery? Maybe, but we just have to work on it!" This is a similar statement to Conway Morris and is another unsatisfying answer for a question that these scientists are so sure is correct. Hume has made many criticisms but they seem to be flawed in some ways. He says that we should compare the universe to something like an animal but an argument could be made that the universe is not like an animal but something far greater. He said that if we cant see something then it isn't worth talking about. He then is almost inferring that there is chance of design, which could contradict his argument greatly. I think that given all this evidence for and against God and the Design argument, they must all be considered before a decision should be made. Paley and Aquinas present the argument very skilfully but its flaws are exploited by the likes of Mill, Darwin, Dawkins and Hume. I can't say that the strengths outweigh the weaknesses because they balance each other out too much to make a valid judgement. Philosophy of Religion Essay - The Design Argument Matthew Oliver 1 17/05/2008

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related AS and A Level Philosophy

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the design argument for the existence of God.

    4 star(s)

    Dawkins claims that science has demonstrated that chance is the cause of the universe and the life within it; but this is not incontrovertible.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The design argument is also known as the teleological argument. The argument looks at ...

    3 star(s)

    He therefore argued that the apparent design is in fact the result of a natural and random process. Dawkins supports Darwinian evolution and rejects God. Mill, another critic of the argument, argues that nature is 'guilty' of serious crimes for which she goes unpunished.

  1. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the teleological, deontological and hybrid systems of ethics ...

    This can be seen as a strength, as the this system has clear simple rules to guide us, one can make quick decisions easily in a medical situation in this century, which could save vital time in saving someone's life.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    The separation, therefore, of the idea of a cause from that of a beginning of existence, is plainly possible for the imagination; and consequently the actual separation of these objects is so far possible, that it implies no contradiction

  1. The religious experience argument is the most convincing proof for the existence of God. ...

    The third private religious experience is when an individual reflects upon their life and concludes that God was in fact guiding them. These categories agree with the above statement as they emphasise the fact that many people have religious experiences thus there is no real lack of evidence in this sense.

  2. Key Features of the Teleological Arguement

    The above analogies are linked to the universe and God as the designer. David Hume used the analogy of a machine; machines are designed by human beings with intelligence. The world and the universe it is in resembles a machine.

  1. "The design argument is challenged far more by science than by philosophy." Discuss with ...

    Darwin's theory removes the entire need for God and gives an explanation of the world that removes the need for him. Darwin (and Richard Dawkins afterwards) have said that natural selection is just random and is not intended and designed.

  2. Explain the Copplestone-Russell Radio Debate

    But when is an explanation adequate? Suppose I am about to make a flame with a match. You may say that the adequate explanation of that is that I rub it on the box. However Copplestone concluded that an adequate explanation is one which "nothing more can be added."

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.