Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access for just £4.99 per month

AS and A Level: Practical Questions

View now
Discover fantastic essays... Learn from Teacher-annotated essays and dramatically improve your grades
Students learn faster on Marked by Teachers. Learning from worked examples accelerates learning by 29%. Use this accelerated learning to reach your potential

387 AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  • Peer Reviewed essays 1
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. …
  6. 39
  1. Peer reviewed

    Give an account of Fletcher's Theory of Situation Ethics.

    4 star(s)

    Well structured and focused essay; Fletchers main theories on situation ethics are discussed well. The first paragraph which gives an account on the background of Fletcher is good as it…

    • Essay length: 545 words
    • Submitted: 16/09/2003
    • Reviewed by: (?) nilabkebab 18/04/2012

  2. Every adult has the right to become a parent. Discuss

    • Essay length: 718 words
    • Submitted: 05/06/2012

  3. What are the ethical issues involved as a result of using biotechnology in cases of infertility ?

    • Essay length: 862 words
    • Submitted: 01/05/2012

  4. Does everyone have a right to a child?

    • Essay length: 1421 words
    • Submitted: 12/04/2012

  5. Moral Absolutism can Never be Justified. Discuss

    • Essay length: 890 words
    • Submitted: 04/04/2012

  6. People with disabilities are less valuable than able-bodied people. To what extent must religion reject this view?

    • Essay length: 848 words
    • Submitted: 03/04/2012

  7. Examine how Benthams utilitarianism may be applied to one ethical issue of your choice. Organ transplants.

    • Essay length: 1206 words
    • Submitted: 03/04/2012

  8. What is Christian ethics?

    • Essay length: 1033 words
    • Submitted: 23/03/2012

  9. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    • Essay length: 3087 words
    • Submitted: 07/03/2012

  10. A Kantian would never allow abortion. Discuss.

    • Essay length: 601 words
    • Submitted: 25/01/2012
387 essays
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. …
  6. 39

Meet the Marked by Teachers team

The teachers

Our team of teachers have over 435 years of teaching experience between them - that's a lot of essay marking.

Find out more about the team

TSR peer reviewers

The peer review team is a specialist squad of the brightest UK student talent, working together to provide rounded essay reviews.

Find out more about the team

Conclusion analysis

Good conclusions usually refer back to the question or title and address it directly - for example by using key words from the title.
How well do you think these conclusions address the title or question? Answering these questions should help you find out.

  1. Do they use key words from the title or question?
  2. Do they answer the question directly?
  3. Can you work out the question or title just by reading the conclusion?

  • Discuss the view that only a religious ethic can provide an acceptable basis for medical ethics.

    "In conclusion I think that a religious ethic is by no means the only acceptable basis for medical ethics. Although some Christian ethics will provide a stable answer for every situation, an answer that will never change and therefore will have clear-cut boundaries, not every person in the world will ever be of the same religion, and therefore it cannot be universal. Therefore a non-religious ethic which everyone could agree on seems more acceptable, such as one that allows situations to be considered, because therefore a religious ethic could be used in certain circumstances if the people involved would like to do so, as that happens to be their own "situation"; similarly if someone does not want to apply a religious ethical theory then they are not obliged to do so, because again this option would apply to their situation. Therefore situationist ethics that are not based on religion can be made universal, allowing religious ethics to be applied or not according to the wishes of the people involved and this seems to me to be the only acceptable basis for medical ethics, an ethic that will allow for everyone's personal beliefs."

  • Discuss critically the belief that conscience is the voice of God.

    "To conclude, I do not firmly believe that conscience is the voice of God. Mainly because of the difficulties which arise with conflicting consciences. There are a number of religions with competing claims about truth, making people sincerely believe different things on a wide variety of ethical and religious issues. Also, atheists say that conscience is very important to them and if they do not believe in God then how can conscience be the voice of God? Surely if conscience was the voice of God then atheists would find it hard to have conscience in their lives."

  • Analyse and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of natural moral law as a definitive ethical theory

    "In trying to decide then, if natural moral law can be held as a definitive ethical theory one has to realise that although the theory isn't as rigid as it first appears it is still faced with problems, which may well, be insurmountable. The conclusions of the Roman Catholic Church regarding the prohibition of activities such as artificial contraception and homosexual acts, as already shown, can be subject to convincing challenge. It is also important to note that in the absence of clear guidelines it is impossible to know definitively what is and what is not natural and so therefore rendering the issue wholly subjective. Once an issue becomes subjective, and it is difficult to produce an instance when subjectivity would be absent, natural moral law has to fail as a definitive ethical theory."

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.