• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

R.S. Philosophy Did God create evil and suffering?

Free essay example:

Does the presence of evil in the world mean that God is not in control, or, if God is in control, why is there evil in the world? Is God not good?

This question being asked is probably the most popular argument which contradicts against Gods existence in the world today. Many answers have been given but permanently settling the issue is impossible because so many of our answers raise further questions. However as we cannot answer this question entirely we can offer many solutions to it.

First of all how do we define the word evil? There are two types of evil: moral and physical. Moral evil is wilful sin, while physical evil is natural harm. Some examples of moral evil are: murder, adultery, theft and abortion. Examples of physical evil are famine, illness, natural disasters and death. Both moral and physical evil causes many problems and contradictions regarding the existence of God. The concept of evil has caused much confusion, not only among Christians, but also among spiritually people all over the world. One of the main reasons behind this confusion is the widespread dilemma of whether God is really the creator of evil or did humans’ free will create it?

The idea of God creating evil is contrived by many religious groups. Judaism talks about ‘yetzer ra’ which translates to ‘evil impulse, and also ‘yetzer tov’ or ‘good impulse’. Judaists realise they all have these impulses as humans and the goal is to not give into the ‘evil’ impulse. From a Catholic point of view they believe evil is the absence or opposite of good, and moral evil results from humankind’s free choice of sin. A lot of Christians believe evil entered through the world due to the original sin.

For many believers the idea of God supposing to be all-loving and all-powerful and at the same time allow the existence of evil and suffering in this world is hard to accept. The free will defence is one of the most popular approaches that theologians use to answer the question above. This approach transcends its argument by attacking the idea that an all-loving and all-powerful God cannot exist in a world where evil survives. The argument says that when God created humans, he gave us the ability to choose our course of actions for ourselves. He did this because He wanted us to experience on our own between right and wrong, good and evil, and believing in Him or not. God could not create humans without giving them free will. If He had done so, then humanity’s faith in God and their actions of faithfulness would mean nothing.

A lot of people believe that at afterlife all the innocent that suffered because of the evil acts of others must be compensated for being faithful to God, in spite their suffering. This is why some believe that for the free will defence to work there must be a dimension beyond time and history where suffering finds its course.

For most people the problem of evil is not an intellectual problem, but an emotional one. They want to know why God allows evil and suffering. When they can’t get a satisfactory answer, they become angry. They don’t like a God who would permit them or others to suffer.

Firstly, from the opposing point of view, people may think that God created evil and that this is the root of all suffering in the world for reasons we simply cannot yet understand. Christians can have confidence in God knowing that; “His ways are above ours” (Isaiah 55:8-9), which means that Christians can put there faith into God whatever he does, and even if there is something in the world they do not understand yet - Christians know it is for a reason.

Secondly, God is possibly using suffering to do good. In other words, he produces patience through misfortune. Or He may desire to save someone through it all. An example of this is the account of Jospeh who was sold into slavery. Jospeh suffered greatly for this but God rose Joseph up into Egypt to make supplies for the people of the land during the coming drought of seven years. Egypt was saved and so was Joseph’s family and brothers who originally sold him into slavery. Joseph replies “You meant it for evil, but God meant it for good” (Genesis 50: 15-21). This quotation basically speaks for itself. Joseph is saying that God is letting his brothers do something immoral but God is doing it for the good of Joseph’s family.  

Thirdly God may be letting evil occur so that on the day of judgement, the damned will have no say regarding their sentence. God isn’t stopping people from exercising their free will; he is simply letting them proceed with how they want to live their lives. When the day of judgement comes upon us, all of the sins and evil will be taken into account regarding the person.

God is a good person in many diverse ways. If some people believe he created evil then they will have a different representation of him (most probably a bad representation), but as for the others who believe in free will, they might see God in a positive way. Nothing in the Bible shows God being a hateful person to his followers. But if there was a inkling of doubt, like Josephs’ tale, if God is doing something evil then it is in the end meant for good.

Overall I can come to a conclusion that God isn’t the reason why evil is present in the world. We cause our own suffering. Our sinful world is the unfortunate result of human choice; not even Satan can force us to sin. Pain, suffering and death are integral parts of the material world due to Adam's sin, but Christianity offers hope through the suffering of Jesus Christ. Evil in this world is not a disproof of God, but a constant reminder of our need for the perfect God of the Bible. The free will defense is a very functional way of approaching evil in this world.

It allows people to logically understand and accept the fact that evil is able to exist in a world that an all-knowing and all-powerful God created. This defence is not infallible but it does however answer the problem sufficiently for many believers including myself.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level Religious Studies & Philosophy Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain the problem of evil (25 marks). Are the theodicies attempts to ...

    Darwin discussed that given evil exists, we must choose between two hypothesis, either that there is an infinitely powerful, completely good God who created the world or ... that there is no such God. Lastly, William Rowe stated how pointless evil is evidence that a theistic God cannot exist at

  2. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    a certain extent which we can prove, as it depends on how much free will we have in the first place. The theodicy was developed by Augustine and in his works, he argues that suffering is not caused by God, not is it his responsibility.

  1. In what ways may suffering create a philosophical problem for religious believers? Outline 2 ...

    John Hick has also added to the Irenaean Theodicy, although it has not led to much change. Both theodices trace evil back to human free will and they both say that when humans use their freedom to disobey God, they can cause suffering, but is a big juxtaposition between the theodices mentioned.

  2. A Critical Analysis of Lao Tzu's Tao Teh Ching - Chineses philosophy.

    Again, it is possible to present criticism against this definition of philosophy and the approach I have laid out: one could, for example, claim that what is rational in one culture may not be regarded rational in another, and consequently the definition for philosophy offered in this essay is culturally laden.

  1. problem of evil

    An example of the problem being used in this way is in Hume's combat of Thomas Aquinas' Design Argument (Summa Thelogica) where he labels the Problem of Evil as 'The Rock of Atheism'. However, whilst being a problem for theists in that it challenges the nature of God, it also poses problems in other ways.

  2. Problem of evil

    which accepts that the child may have to suffer to get to greater good of being freed from his cancer but that he should not be stabbed straight after. It can accept that a stolen purse or wallet leads us to be cautious in future but what of the Gulag and the Holocaust?

  1. Introduction to Philosophy.

    This lead to the stability of being. * He stated that senses are not reliable. * Logic --> a thing that can be true and false at the same time. The difference between thought and sense : Thought Sense Ideas Sensory point Concepts Intellect Show that there is change Therefore the conclusion of Parmenides is that senses must be based on thoughts to be correct .

  2. Evaluate the claim that the existence of natural evil in the world makes it ...

    likeness, throughout life we are given challenges which help us grow closer to God in the hope of entering his likeness.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work