• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reasoned arguments cannot account for the amount of evil in the world. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Reasoned arguments cannot account for the amount of evil in the world. Discuss. The problem of evil has troubled theologians, especially Christian theologians, for centuries and many have put forward reasoned arguments, known as theodicies, that reconcile a all-powerful and all-good God with the amount of evil in the world. The two most famous theodicies are proposed by Augustine and Irenaeus. Some people believe that theodicies provide a rational defense of belief in God even though evil exists. The Augustinian theodicy states that God is not responsible for the existence of evil because it is not a separate entity, but rather the privation of goodness. God, as the creator of the universe, cannot be held accountable for something that he did not create. In my opinion, however, that evil is not merely the privation of goodness. Some examples of evil, such as seeing a homeless beggar and decide not to give him any money, can indeed be said to be a privation of goodness; however, other examples of evil, such as the Holocaust, are simply too ?evil? to be called a privation of goodness- they are much more than that. ...read more.


Other people believe that reasoned arguments can indeed account for the amount of evil in this world. Following on from the Augustinian theodicy, some argue that the amount of suffering in this world is in fact proportionate to the amount of sin, i.e. the abuse of free will which causes one to fall away from goodness. Every one of us has selfish desires and everyday we commit sins, however small the sins may be. In other words, we are abusing our free will on a daily basis. When we add up the amount of sins committed by everyone in the world since the beginning of time, the existence of the enormous amount of evil in the world can be justly explained. The Christian God, who is a God of justice, does not have a choice but to punish us according to the gravity of our sin. I do not agree with this view as it does not seem to be fair for righteous people to suffer the consequences of sins which they never committed. ...read more.


Another example is the prophet Jonah. God intended for him to be the one who preaches repentance to the city of Nineveh. Initially he lacked the faith to do so and decided to run away; however after three trying days in a whale?s stomach, where he repented and prayed to God, he gained faith and succeeded in his mission. Joseph is another example and this view can be summarized in what he says in Genesis 50:20, ?What you meant for evil, God used for good.? I do not agree with this view because some people suffer much more than their fair share and the fact that many are broken by the amount of suffering and consequentially lose the will to go on shows that God has already tested them beyond their limits, if it is indeed God who has inflicted the suffering on them. In conclusion, I agree with the statement. I believe that reasoned arguments can only account for a limited amount of evil, but not the enormous amount of evil that exists in this world. I believe that, fundamentally, the notion of the inconsistent triad still holds truth. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christianity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Christianity essays

  1. Parables. Give an account of the content and teaching of the Good Samaritan and ...

    The tax collector's prayer confirms what we have just heard, as his prayer can be seen as the opposite of that of the Pharisee. He expresses the greatest humility; while looking up to Heaven often accompanied prayer, he is too ashamed to do this, with his shame and remorse being even more evident in the beating of his breast.

  2. Life after death and problem of evil

    it was the work of the devil outside of God's control and others state that God created evil. The former opinion coincides with the belief of a process theodicy. We need to suffer to become like God. Another way to look at this statement is from the viewpoint that evil exists, but a life after death does not.

  1. RS Evil and Suffering Essay

    This is surely not the kind of feature that a loving God would have included in a world that he created. So the religious believer needs to be able to justify why God does not do anything to remove this evil from the world.

  2. Outline the arguments for the dependency of morality and religion

    Clearly these people are using religious interpretation to vastly abuse their moral calling and most people would agree that this is a bad case of religion mixing with morality. The fact that this group is Christian and is able to do things that most would consider very un-Christian shows that in religion there is a huge scope for interpretation.

  1. Assess whether the problem of moral evil casts doubt on the existence of God

    This is better than being robots, for it allows us to have a genuine and loving relationship with God. Furthermore, free will makes an end to evil within our power through option of redemption and salvation. Vardy's free will defence is as follows: P1.

  2. Descartes logically proved the existence of an infinite and truthful being - Discuss.

    In The Republic, a distinction was made between harming someone and hurting someone, being that harming makes one less noble and hurting may make one more noble. A being that is Just being would never do harm. Purgatory is an example of hurt without harm because it cleans the soul of every instance of sin.

  1. In what ways might evil and suffering create philosophical problems for people with ...

    Richard Swinburne maintains that it does not make sense to assume there are such greater goods, unless we know what they are, i.e., we have a successful theodicy. Many contemporary philosophers disagree. Skeptical theism, which is based on the theological position that humans can never expect to understand the divine,

  2. God is responsible for everything that happens in the Universe. Discuss.

    Since justice is one of God?s qualities, he must have given humans free will. It is not to say, however, that God gave humans free will so that they could choose to sin against him, because if this was his purpose, then humans could not be justly punished whey they

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work