• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reasoned arguments cannot account for the amount of evil in the world. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Reasoned arguments cannot account for the amount of evil in the world. Discuss. The problem of evil has troubled theologians, especially Christian theologians, for centuries and many have put forward reasoned arguments, known as theodicies, that reconcile a all-powerful and all-good God with the amount of evil in the world. The two most famous theodicies are proposed by Augustine and Irenaeus. Some people believe that theodicies provide a rational defense of belief in God even though evil exists. The Augustinian theodicy states that God is not responsible for the existence of evil because it is not a separate entity, but rather the privation of goodness. God, as the creator of the universe, cannot be held accountable for something that he did not create. In my opinion, however, that evil is not merely the privation of goodness. Some examples of evil, such as seeing a homeless beggar and decide not to give him any money, can indeed be said to be a privation of goodness; however, other examples of evil, such as the Holocaust, are simply too ?evil? to be called a privation of goodness- they are much more than that. ...read more.

Middle

Other people believe that reasoned arguments can indeed account for the amount of evil in this world. Following on from the Augustinian theodicy, some argue that the amount of suffering in this world is in fact proportionate to the amount of sin, i.e. the abuse of free will which causes one to fall away from goodness. Every one of us has selfish desires and everyday we commit sins, however small the sins may be. In other words, we are abusing our free will on a daily basis. When we add up the amount of sins committed by everyone in the world since the beginning of time, the existence of the enormous amount of evil in the world can be justly explained. The Christian God, who is a God of justice, does not have a choice but to punish us according to the gravity of our sin. I do not agree with this view as it does not seem to be fair for righteous people to suffer the consequences of sins which they never committed. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another example is the prophet Jonah. God intended for him to be the one who preaches repentance to the city of Nineveh. Initially he lacked the faith to do so and decided to run away; however after three trying days in a whale?s stomach, where he repented and prayed to God, he gained faith and succeeded in his mission. Joseph is another example and this view can be summarized in what he says in Genesis 50:20, ?What you meant for evil, God used for good.? I do not agree with this view because some people suffer much more than their fair share and the fact that many are broken by the amount of suffering and consequentially lose the will to go on shows that God has already tested them beyond their limits, if it is indeed God who has inflicted the suffering on them. In conclusion, I agree with the statement. I believe that reasoned arguments can only account for a limited amount of evil, but not the enormous amount of evil that exists in this world. I believe that, fundamentally, the notion of the inconsistent triad still holds truth. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christianity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Christianity essays

  1. Parables. Give an account of the content and teaching of the Good Samaritan and ...

    Second, we learn that true prayer comes from setting our lives beside the life of god. The Pharisee compares his own flaws, not with God's infinite perfections, but with the imagined greater flaws of others. Finally, we learn that we do not gain salvation through our actions.

  2. Outline the arguments for the dependency of morality and religion

    This is known as the Euthyphro dilemma. If one then asks why is God good? It is because he obeys what he commands, which shows a limited understanding of God. This is often why many people that there should be no link between religion and morality.

  1. Life after death and problem of evil

    Hick was a firm believer in freedom, and argued that however strong the evil was, if God intervened we would never be truly free. Where evil originated from is a common disagreement amongst the religious and thinkers within theology. Some argue, like Augustine that humans created evil, others say that

  2. RS Evil and Suffering Essay

    Moral evil for Hick has a positive value. In the Augustinian theodicy evil is an absence, but for Hick it has a definite value, and has been given by God as part of a soul making world. Another type of evil is natural evil, this included things such as earthquakes, volcanoes, illnesses and flood.

  1. In what ways might evil and suffering create philosophical problems for people with ...

    Richard Swinburne maintains that it does not make sense to assume there are such greater goods, unless we know what they are, i.e., we have a successful theodicy. Many contemporary philosophers disagree. Skeptical theism, which is based on the theological position that humans can never expect to understand the divine,

  2. God is responsible for everything that happens in the Universe. Discuss.

    Since justice is one of God?s qualities, he must have given humans free will. It is not to say, however, that God gave humans free will so that they could choose to sin against him, because if this was his purpose, then humans could not be justly punished whey they

  1. Miracles provide great hope for a hurting world. Discuss

    This calls God?s traits into question. If he was omnibenevolent he would want to heal everyone, and if he was omnipotent he would have the power to do so. But he doesn?t, so this calls his very existence into question. Therefore miracles do not provide hope.

  2. Contemporary discussion on Augustine

    own nature by having a proper relationship with God so that the ego can understand its limitations and possibilities. ?Original Sin is that thing about man which makes him capable of conceiving his own perfection but incapable of achieving it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work