• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Relative ethics is the best approach when making fair decisions discuss (10 marks)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Transfer-Encoding: chunked ?Relative ethics is the best approach when making fair decisions? discuss (10 marks) Relative ethics is where decisions are made with the circumstances in mind. For instance the culture and traditions of the place, the individuals, and society. Examples of relative ethics is utilitarianism and situation ethics. Relative ethics can be seen to be a fair approach to decision making because it is tolerant of different values, it is more realistic that nothing is right or wrong, it is more open to atheists, and is considers emotions as important. However it is more complex and makes decisions harder, it can be used as an excuse to act in an immoral way, it implies that we should not have laws and it does not protect worldwide human rights. ...read more.

Middle

This may seem fair in one way but it actually means that any act can be acceptable and doesn?t protect our human rights, sexism is wrong and women should never be discriminated against no matter their religion. Some laws need to be absolute. Someone in a different country may claim that for example kidnap and torture are part of their culture, but we know this is wrong. Relative ethics can be seen as fair because in it there are no absolute objective rights or wrongs. The right thing to do depends on the situation. For example, if a woman stole food out of greed then it would be wrong. ...read more.

Conclusion

In Utilitarianism, the consequences of each option have to be predicted and consequences. When each individual situation has to be considered, it can cause complications and ensuring every person gets a good result is difficult. Some may argue that the time it takes to make a decision about the morality of an act is causes those involved more suffering and is unjust. In conclusion I think that relative ethics is the best approach to making fair ethical decisions. However, I believe that some actions are wrong no matter the culture or time or individual. For example, discrimination is always wrong and torture of innocents and kidnapping is wrong. Despite this, relative ethics is tolerant of all cultures and does not believe that in any situations that one persons or country?s morals are superior to anothers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Evaluate the claim that conscience is a reliable guide to ethical decision making.

    with a cryptic message, with conscience being the Enigma machine we use to decode it. At the forefront of Aquinas conscience is Reason. Being, like Butler, a natural law theorist, Aquinas saw the role of conscience (reason making right decisions)

  2. Religious Ethics are not the best approach to environmental ethics'. Discuss.

    Kant also viewed animals as of no moral concern to humans; the only time it is wrong to hurt an animal is when it could instrumentally harm a human. However, by Kant's reasoning that we can only have concern for animals if the impact is on humanity, he is contradicting

  1. Utilitarianism is unjust

    don't have to do anything or put forth any effort to achieve. Nothing in life truly comes for free; we must work for our accomplishments. It is hard work and determination that reaches our goals, not short-cuts. Because false happiness can be taken away, this leads to the conclusion that

  2. We are free to make ethical decisions, discuss

    It says that some of our actions are determined but that we are really morally responsible for our actions. For example there is a difference between Ghandi choosing to fast, and a man being locked up without food. In both cases, the actions are determined, and the men could not do otherwise.

  1. Business Ethics

    * The encouragement and maintenance of responsible behavior by public servant * The promotion of public confidence in the integrity of public officials * The provision of guidelines to officials regarding their relationship with other officials, elected public representatives and members of the public * The provision of guidelines to

  2. To what extent, if at all, should conscience be ignored when making ethical decisions?

    insists that it must be followed whatever the circumstances as it is a gift from God. Cardinal Ratzinger says "Over the Pope as the expression of the binding claim of ecclesiastical authority, there still stands one's own conscience, which must be obeyed before all else"(Philosophy of Religion and Ethics by Peter Vardy).

  1. Business Ethics

    This helps also to boost the brand value of the firm. Customers will choose ethical engaged products and brands among a large diversity of products. For example, in the marketplace, corporate ethical reputations have a clear impact on the purchasing and investment decisions of Americans, but ethical lapses in the

  2. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    Absolute refers to the fact that the moral laws will not and cannot change, and are the same for everyone everywhere through all periods of time, such as Kant's deontological theory. Relative means the rules may change depending on the circumstances, the individual, the society or the time period.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work