• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Relativist Ethical Theory

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain One Ethical Theory which could be considered relativist. Relativists believe that moral truth varies depending on culture, time, place and religion. Relativists believe that there's no fixed objective morality-or if there is it can't be discovered. J.L Mackie 'there is no objective moral value.'different culture's ethics are evidence against the existence of moral absolutes, and people participate in different ways of living, or codes. Situation ethics is flexible and practical, therefore it could be considered a relativist theory It takes into account the complexities of human life, and can make tough decisions where, from a legalistic perspective all actions seem wrong. The situationist enters into the moral dilemma with ethics and rules and principles of his or her community or tradition. However, the situationist is prepared to set aside those rules in the situation if love seems better served by doing so. Situations ethics lets one change their values so it is relative to the situation, this fundamental rule makes Situation Ethics both teleological and relativist. Teleological theories are interested in the 'end'. For a teleological thinker the end justifies the means. You decide the rightness of an action by the end it produces. ...read more.

Middle

Situation Ethics and Relativist Ethics differ in the sense that relativist believe that there's no fixed objective morality. Although situation Ethics is not defined by many rules like Catholicism, it still has a definitive moral commandment that we should aim to produce the most love from a situation via an intrinsic duty. 'No Ethical theory is completely relativist.' Discuss I agree that no ethical theory is completely relativist, because in being a theory it is always defined by a core value. In the case of Situation Ethics, the second proposition is that 'The ruling norm of Christian decision is love: nothing else. For example Jesus replaced the Torah with the principle of love. Take for example, his decision to heal(work) on the Sabbath day, rejecting the obligations of the Sabbath observance. This shows that the Commandments are not absolute Some people argue that situational ethics gives people more freedom to make their own decisions (which could be a good or bad thing, as stated by Bishop Robinson)but in reality , it has just the same amount of freedom as the next ethical theory; it commands that you should take the most loving course of action, showing ...read more.

Conclusion

and then follow those laws. This means I have a duty to, for example, tell the truth because it generally leads to greater happiness, even if in this case it will lead to more unhappiness. This is deontological, because it deals with the duty to follow rules. In this method, utilitarianism can be seen as absolutist because there are no exceptions to the rules. In Virtue ethics some ethicists, such as Martha Nussbaum, describe Aristotle's theory as absolutist. It is teleological, because it is about the ends or purposes of our actions. However, Aristotle is saying (according to Nussbaum) that certain ends or goals are absolute - it is always good to be honest, kind, courageous etc. Other modern virtue ethicists say that values change, and different societies hold up different virtues as desirable. What is virtuous, according to MacIntyre, is relative to the context - relative to culture, varying throughout history. Virtue ethics is teleological, focussing on the ends or purposes of our actions. These ends or purposes vary from one society to another throughout time, so in this way virtue ethics can be viewed as relativist. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. What are the Main Features of Utilitarianism as an Ethical Theory?

    This means the majority. I therefore means that the minority are left to suffer the pain of being a minority as well as any pain left from the greatest good for the greatest number. An example of this may be people who disagree with Sunday trading.

  2. Kant's theory of Ethics

    If everyone made promises they could not keep, then the act of 'promising' itself would be impossible, as no one would believe your promise and laugh at any such utterances as vain pretences. Kant believes we should only live by those maxims that would still make sense when universalised, to include all people.

  1. RE euthanasia for and against

    People think that if we legalise euthanasia, we will ultimately fall into the trap of involuntary euthanasia and doctors will have lots of power over our fate. It is not possible to register every act of euthanasia voluntary, as there would be some cases of involuntary where the patient has their destiny decided for them.

  2. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    Basically, the subject of the statement is contained within the predicate. In the statement 'all unmarried men are bachelors', 'unmarried men' is the subject and 'bachelors' is the predicate. In this statement, the predicate and subject both mean the same thing so it would be foolish to say that the statement is false.

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    Even success and happiness are not in themselves good, honour can lead to pride, happiness without good will is underserved good luck. A key for Kant is autonomy. If my intention is right, then I will not act at the whim of my sense, but with autonomy.

  2. I will be discussing John Stewart Mill theory on utilitarianism. Then I will point ...

    Add up those levels of happiness in those cases. (It is possible to measure happiness on some sort of linear scale.) Compare the results and then see which one would lead to the total maximum happiness, the answer should be the morally correct one.

  1. Explain the theory of Virtue Ethics

    A successive series of actions are also for an aim, for example getting up in to morning to go to work, is to make money, is to feed our families is to go on nice holidays is to buy them nice things etc.

  2. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    This is a clear example of different societies believing in different morals. Normative relativism states that at different times, in different societies, people have had different views on morality which were right for them in that time period/are right for them in their culture.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work