• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Relativist Ethical Theory

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain One Ethical Theory which could be considered relativist. Relativists believe that moral truth varies depending on culture, time, place and religion. Relativists believe that there's no fixed objective morality-or if there is it can't be discovered. J.L Mackie 'there is no objective moral value.'different culture's ethics are evidence against the existence of moral absolutes, and people participate in different ways of living, or codes. Situation ethics is flexible and practical, therefore it could be considered a relativist theory It takes into account the complexities of human life, and can make tough decisions where, from a legalistic perspective all actions seem wrong. The situationist enters into the moral dilemma with ethics and rules and principles of his or her community or tradition. However, the situationist is prepared to set aside those rules in the situation if love seems better served by doing so. Situations ethics lets one change their values so it is relative to the situation, this fundamental rule makes Situation Ethics both teleological and relativist. Teleological theories are interested in the 'end'. For a teleological thinker the end justifies the means. You decide the rightness of an action by the end it produces. ...read more.

Middle

Situation Ethics and Relativist Ethics differ in the sense that relativist believe that there's no fixed objective morality. Although situation Ethics is not defined by many rules like Catholicism, it still has a definitive moral commandment that we should aim to produce the most love from a situation via an intrinsic duty. 'No Ethical theory is completely relativist.' Discuss I agree that no ethical theory is completely relativist, because in being a theory it is always defined by a core value. In the case of Situation Ethics, the second proposition is that 'The ruling norm of Christian decision is love: nothing else. For example Jesus replaced the Torah with the principle of love. Take for example, his decision to heal(work) on the Sabbath day, rejecting the obligations of the Sabbath observance. This shows that the Commandments are not absolute Some people argue that situational ethics gives people more freedom to make their own decisions (which could be a good or bad thing, as stated by Bishop Robinson)but in reality , it has just the same amount of freedom as the next ethical theory; it commands that you should take the most loving course of action, showing ...read more.

Conclusion

and then follow those laws. This means I have a duty to, for example, tell the truth because it generally leads to greater happiness, even if in this case it will lead to more unhappiness. This is deontological, because it deals with the duty to follow rules. In this method, utilitarianism can be seen as absolutist because there are no exceptions to the rules. In Virtue ethics some ethicists, such as Martha Nussbaum, describe Aristotle's theory as absolutist. It is teleological, because it is about the ends or purposes of our actions. However, Aristotle is saying (according to Nussbaum) that certain ends or goals are absolute - it is always good to be honest, kind, courageous etc. Other modern virtue ethicists say that values change, and different societies hold up different virtues as desirable. What is virtuous, according to MacIntyre, is relative to the context - relative to culture, varying throughout history. Virtue ethics is teleological, focussing on the ends or purposes of our actions. These ends or purposes vary from one society to another throughout time, so in this way virtue ethics can be viewed as relativist. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. What are the Main Features of Utilitarianism as an Ethical Theory?

    This means the majority. I therefore means that the minority are left to suffer the pain of being a minority as well as any pain left from the greatest good for the greatest number. An example of this may be people who disagree with Sunday trading.

  2. Kant's theory of Ethics

    Suppose he decides to lie. The maxim he has acted by is as follows: whenever I need money, I will borrow it and promise to repay it, even if I know I cannot pay it back. This may benefit one's future welfare but it is not morally right as, if this law was universalised, it would be self-contradictory.

  1. Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

    In this case, we must treat homosexuals with respect and not judge them for their way of living. We must show compassion for every human being, no matter what his or her race, creed or sexuality. While these religious views are still seen as highly acceptable, it is fast becoming

  2. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    One of the first major challenges to Kant's reasoning came from a Swiss philosopher, Benjamin Constant. He said that since truth telling must be universal according to Kant's theory, one must (if asked) tell a known murderer the location of his prey.

  1. “Without real freedom there would be no ethical decisions to make,” Discuss.

    illusion that we have chosen ourselves and decided our own fate; exercised free will. This deterministic concept can be looked at from three main perspectives, the first, hard determinism, considers everything in the present to be directly caused by events that preceded them.

  2. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    If a statement cannot be shown to be either true or false then it is a meaningless statement. For logical positivists, there are three types of statement: Analytic, Synthetic or Meaningless. Analytic statements are statements that can be established to be either true or false by analysing their constituent parts.

  1. RE euthanasia for and against

    This case from a practical point of view supports euthanasia as it shows that the doctor's time and government's money can be used elsewhere where it can actually be of a benefit. PATIENT CHOICE vs. DOCTOR RESPONSIBILITY The patient has the right to make a choice whether or not they

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    The ideas of prescriptivism give purpose and meaning to moral statements by claiming that when we use ethical language, we are actually recommending or prescribing a course of action which could be applied in view of the situation. For example, prescriptivism states that if I were to say "murder is wrong", I am not just saying "Murder-Boo!".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work