• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Relativist Ethical Theory

Extracts from this document...


Explain One Ethical Theory which could be considered relativist. Relativists believe that moral truth varies depending on culture, time, place and religion. Relativists believe that there's no fixed objective morality-or if there is it can't be discovered. J.L Mackie 'there is no objective moral value.'different culture's ethics are evidence against the existence of moral absolutes, and people participate in different ways of living, or codes. Situation ethics is flexible and practical, therefore it could be considered a relativist theory It takes into account the complexities of human life, and can make tough decisions where, from a legalistic perspective all actions seem wrong. The situationist enters into the moral dilemma with ethics and rules and principles of his or her community or tradition. However, the situationist is prepared to set aside those rules in the situation if love seems better served by doing so. Situations ethics lets one change their values so it is relative to the situation, this fundamental rule makes Situation Ethics both teleological and relativist. Teleological theories are interested in the 'end'. For a teleological thinker the end justifies the means. You decide the rightness of an action by the end it produces. ...read more.


Situation Ethics and Relativist Ethics differ in the sense that relativist believe that there's no fixed objective morality. Although situation Ethics is not defined by many rules like Catholicism, it still has a definitive moral commandment that we should aim to produce the most love from a situation via an intrinsic duty. 'No Ethical theory is completely relativist.' Discuss I agree that no ethical theory is completely relativist, because in being a theory it is always defined by a core value. In the case of Situation Ethics, the second proposition is that 'The ruling norm of Christian decision is love: nothing else. For example Jesus replaced the Torah with the principle of love. Take for example, his decision to heal(work) on the Sabbath day, rejecting the obligations of the Sabbath observance. This shows that the Commandments are not absolute Some people argue that situational ethics gives people more freedom to make their own decisions (which could be a good or bad thing, as stated by Bishop Robinson)but in reality , it has just the same amount of freedom as the next ethical theory; it commands that you should take the most loving course of action, showing ...read more.


and then follow those laws. This means I have a duty to, for example, tell the truth because it generally leads to greater happiness, even if in this case it will lead to more unhappiness. This is deontological, because it deals with the duty to follow rules. In this method, utilitarianism can be seen as absolutist because there are no exceptions to the rules. In Virtue ethics some ethicists, such as Martha Nussbaum, describe Aristotle's theory as absolutist. It is teleological, because it is about the ends or purposes of our actions. However, Aristotle is saying (according to Nussbaum) that certain ends or goals are absolute - it is always good to be honest, kind, courageous etc. Other modern virtue ethicists say that values change, and different societies hold up different virtues as desirable. What is virtuous, according to MacIntyre, is relative to the context - relative to culture, varying throughout history. Virtue ethics is teleological, focussing on the ends or purposes of our actions. These ends or purposes vary from one society to another throughout time, so in this way virtue ethics can be viewed as relativist. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. RE euthanasia for and against

    This is not a valid substitute for euthanasia as in the latter stages of illness, when the patient is in chronic pain, euthanasia may seem like the better option at that point in time.

  2. Examine the distinguishing features of a deontological ethical theory.

    This is where few would hold to be obligatory . The other problem is that a rule can be so precisely defined that it only benefits one individual. These points show us that the ability of the rule to be universalised does not itself guarantee that the rule will be morally good or even moral at all.

  1. Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

    This doesn't fit into St. Paul's argument of godless homosexuals. While biblical references are very powerful to Catholics as God's spoken word, there are also many modern day references that are used by Catholics such as the Declaration on Sexual Ethics (1975)

  2. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    Although Kant rejected arguments for the existence of God, his ethical theory assumes immorality of God's existence. Kant believed that the after life and God exist to provide an opportunity for reaching this supreme good, so it could be said that for Kant, morality led to God.

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    she is faced with as the cloning of humans becomes a very real prospect. There are several reasons why it is so difficult to come to a consensus on cloning. First, it is difficult to divorce the idea of cloning other mammals from that of cloning humans.

  2. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    If a statement cannot be shown to be either true or false then it is a meaningless statement. For logical positivists, there are three types of statement: Analytic, Synthetic or Meaningless. Analytic statements are statements that can be established to be either true or false by analysing their constituent parts.

  1. Kant's theory of Ethics

    The start of this book outlines Kant's view regarding the Good Will. Kant writes that he believes that only the motives of people's actions can be called good. 'Nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good, without qualification, except a Good Will' (p.9; the Fundamental Principles...).

  2. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    This means that if a tribe in Africa believe cannibalism is right, then it is right for them, even if it is wrong for us. Or to use the above example, euthanasia is right in Switzerland but wrong in England.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work