• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Religious and/or moral principles are a hindrance with medical ethics. Examine and comment on this claim, with reference to the topic you have investigated.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

George Thomas 12JB Religious and/or moral principles are a hindrance with medical ethics?. Examine and comment on this claim, with reference to the topic you have investigated. Abortion is the medical ethic of which I have investigated; a controversial topic to say the least. The above statement is one that definitely applies to the problems of abortion. However to understand how the statement can be applied one must come to terms with the definitions and aspects of abortion. Abortion can be defined as the intended termination of an unborn child, a foetus. The abortion act was introduced to the UK in 1967; however in Ireland the approach is still illegal. With abortion there is a criteria that follows: two doctors must certify and allow for the abortion to proceed and an abortion cannot go ahead if the method were to cause any lasting physical or psychological damage. In most cases an abortion can go under way if it protects the life of the mother. The methods of abortion are also an important aspect to consider. There are various methods and treatments a woman can have to proceed with the abortion. For example a woman between 7 ? 15 weeks can take a pill which induces the same consequences of a miscarriage; an early medical abortion. This contrasts then with the late term abortion which relies on surgery and surgical instruments being used to extract and exterminate the foetus inside the womb. ...read more.

Middle

He wouldn?t agree with an induced miscarriage or termination. On the other hand theists like Joseph Fletcher would take an approach with the idea of love. Situation Ethics promotes the idea that an action should inflict the most loving thing. Therefore he would sympathise and take into account the woman?s choice of abortion in this case. I believe that the QOL vs. SOL argument is a very strong one indeed and one that won?t cease to exists as long as religious and moral principles remain in our world. The next topic I will go onto investigate is the idea of viability. Viability is the view that at what point should an abortion be acceptable, or viable? The law in the UK has the cut off point of up to 24 weeks which, with moral and religious principles, causes hindrance to abortion. The hindrance being with moral principles and the cultural evolution. There have been cases where, whilst in the same hospital, women at 22 weeks are going into a premature pregnancy, however another women at 24 weeks is having an abortion. The problem here is that, with the aid of modern day technology, the premature baby will go onto live a completely ?normal?, healthy life. Whilst the possible life of the 24 week foetus will lose its possible life. ...read more.

Conclusion

The final topics of abortion which, through religious and moral principles, are a hindrance are the methods and approaches to abortion. This key aspect of abortion one that does result in much conflict. For example, in China, with the aid of the One Child Policy, many women have faced the consequences of this police. A woman who was pregnant with a child at 8 months was forced to have a late medical abortion. This would have been a highly controversial and severe event which of religious and moral principles would conflict with Bentham?s principles of Utility. This act could some appropriate as it is benefitting the majority?s decision, in China, of the policy. Whereas on the other hand, with religious principles such as karma in Hinduism or the mitzvots in Judaism the hindrance would arise in the supposed ?immoral? act of this abortion. In my opinion this case study is highly controversial as it provides the idea of immorality, with principles causing hindrance within the medical ethic. Overall, when looking back at the statement, I think there is much truth and validity in the claim. However as I have investigated there were solutions that came from religious principles. But to conclude, this investigation has shown that medical ethics such as abortion will face challenges and hindrances with the presence of religious and moral principles and values. AO1 AO2 48 / 50 35 / 36 14 / 15 96% = A ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Critically examine what is meant by natural moral law.

    He uses the idea of prophesising; if ones gift if prophesising then let him use it in proportion to ones faith.

  2. Evaluate the claim that conscience is a reliable guide to ethical decision making.

    While you could argue that Aquinas also believed this, Aquinas saw conscience as God-Given, but opearted by human beings. In contrast Newman believed that conscience literally was the voice of God in all of us, informing us of our mistakes and promoting the good course of action.

  1. Religious Studies - Ethics: Natural Moral Law

    Aquinas sought to work out what these final causes were along with the purpose of human life, and broke down the purpose of human existence into five final causes known as the primary precepts. These are recognised as to reproduce, to live in society, to worship God, the educate children and to protect life.

  2. Whilst Deontology has its attractions it fails to provide a reliable foundation for moral ...

    By not being able to do any intrinsically bad actions this will make people feel it is a reliable theory because if you follow these set rules you will not harm another person. Although it seeks justice, it does not seek the best interest of the majority, this means the

  1. (a) Examine the reasons why some argue that morality is linked ...

    Francis Bacon held that ' The inclination to goodness is deeply imprinted in the nature of man' - in contrast to the Christian teaching that as a result of the Fall of Adam - the human heart is sinful and in a state of rebellion against the Creator.

  2. Evaluate a Utilitarian approach to Abortion.

    In relation to abortion, this could happen if a foetus is aborted simply because the family do not see a child as fitting with their current lifestyle, which some people would argue is an immoral choice, but it is justified by the theory; this illustrates that the theory doesn?t protect the interests of the minority.

  1. Assess the claim that Free Will and Determinism are compatible

    If I fail, was this failure inevitable? Does this mean I shouldn't try at all in my education? Volition within Hard Determinism proves to be irrelevant. This in itself makes Hard Determinism a weak system of decision making. Where Hard determinism places almost no emphasis on volition, Libertarianism places too much emphasis on autonomy.

  2. Examine and comment on the view that religious and/or moral principles provide essential guidelines ...

    Therefore it is essential to explore some of the main religious and moral principles in order to ascertain whether or not they are essential guidelines for medical ethics. If one looks at the Hippocratic Oath in the field of medicine they will find the two key aims are to preserve life and to alleviate or prevent suffering.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work