• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Religious Experience - Edexel A2

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Religious Experience Essay "Religious experience does not provide a secure basis for belief in God." Analyse and discuss this claim. Few topics in philosophy and theology cause as much disagreement as religious experience. With its different definitions and numerous types, anything from seeing the Virgin Mary to being relaxed at the sound of your favourite piece of classical music, religious experience has attracted the attention of many scholars, both pro and anti religious experience. Although they can take many different forms, there are several things that link different types of religious experience, although they do not always appear in every experience. They are a personal experience, especially the ones that involve some sort of divine influence. They also have a direct and prominent effect on the person's life. If a person had experienced a near-death experience, and found that they had experienced a pleasant afterlife, then they would be more likely to be relaxed about death. Indeed, there are certain scholars who believe that one can only say that a religious experience has taken place, if there is a change in life. For example, Saul, commonly called Paul, had a famous conversion on the Road to Damascus. ...read more.

Middle

Caroline Franks Davis broadly agrees with Swinburne, taking the view, in The Evidential Force of Religious Experience, that with all the inferred arguments for God's existence, the probability is roughly equal for God's existence as not. Religious experiences, however, may tip the balance in favor of God's existence. C F Davis is most recognized in the field of religious experience for her three challenges over religious experiences, aimed mainly at Swinburne's principles of testimony and credulity. The description related challenge challenges the experience on the basis of self-contradiction, or the inherent difficulty that surrounds the use of language as a communicating tool. Since one person may not necessarily use language the same way as another, the use of language as a communication tool is flawed. The subject related challenge challenges the experience on the basis of the individual experiencing them, and the condition that they were in when they had the experience. If the person was under the influence, then their report may not hold as much weight as someone who had a religious experience when they were in a normal condition. However, a common rebuttal is that, just because someone is somehow mentally impaired, it does not nessecarly mean that what they experienced was not real. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although his definition of an experience is vague, his approach to identifying religious experiences is epically based, and is similar to more modern approaches, like those employed at the Hardy Institute. James also refers to the fruits of the experience being more important than the experience itself, a feeling that holds true with modern theologians. If the objections are combined, then it appears that any religious experience can be objected to in some way: a person's state, the language that they use, the experience, or the person themselves can all be used as an objection; Freud and Jung believed that religious belief was a neurosis, caused by the repressed love of the mother, or from "penis envy." Hume took a less scientific route when he said that theists could not be truly trusted, as they are prone to lying, and are devoid of a "good sense, education and learning" to make sure that they are not fooling themselves. In conclusion, if by a secure basis for belief, we mean a feeling of certainty, then religious experience will only boost the faith of those who believe, and strengthen the criticisms of those who do not believe in God. In short, the religious experience debate falls foul of Flew's vicious circle. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    His argument is that people still go on believing in the loving God. No experience seems to falsify a religious believer's faith. Flew therefore arguers that God-talk is meaningless as it is unfalsifiable, in like manner to the eternally elusive gardener in his analogy.

  2. Moot-court Reflective Report.

    One member of my co-council also used this same case, but also found another case to incorporate into her argument. One member of my co-council and I, met up regularly after we had both prepared our argument so we could practice what we were going to say when we presented

  1. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    David Hume would call into validity the nature of the people who make and verify these claims, stating that either they are religious and seek to prove their beliefs to be true, or are mentally unbalanced and cannot be relied upon to make accurate claims.

  2. Ontological Argument - Edexcel A2

    Using an analogy of a triangle, Descartes said, in Meditations, that although an actual triangle does not have to exist, the mention of a triangle gives the image of a shape with 3 sides and angles totalling 180�. In a similar way, the idea of God gives the image of

  1. Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    As Kierkegaard writes, "doubt is conquered by faith, just as it is faith which has brought doubt into the world. If this is the case, then there is little point in analysing religious experience as it is by its nature a faith proposition, not an empirical one.

  2. Critically assess with reference to William James the arguments from religious experience.

    If this is the case, there is still no objective way to differentiate between religious experiences, drug induced visions and hallucinations and James? argument is further weakened. In addition many people claim that the common core of religious experiences do reveal a consistent picture of God, for example, visions and voices reveal a God who communicates with his people.

  1. Evaluate the claim that corporate religious experience is no more than an illusion

    A prime example of this would be Nazi Germany, where Hitler used techniques to make the average person believe that Jews were an inferior race and that they should be eliminated. However, this theory cannot explain why, in rare cases, some teeth have allegedly turned to gold and that those under ?the Blessing?s? influence can still remember what happened afterwards.

  2. Does Religious Experience offer a convincing argument for God

    He also mentions the Principle of Credulity, meaning that we should believe our senses and if it?s what it appears to be ? it?s more than likely sure to be there so we should just believe what we see. Finally, for Swinburne, religious experience ?tips the balance? in favour of the existence of God.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work