• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Religious experience must be true because there is a common core to them all" Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


"Religious experience must be true because there is a common core to them all" Discuss. The Bible claims that God can be directly experienced and philosophers such as William James saw religion as essentially based on experience and that such experience should be the primary basis of study of religion as opposed to practices and dogma. Indeed many of the world's major religions are based on experience or revelation of the transcendent to mankind. Yet religious experience is intrinsically enormously subjective. Arguably two of the most complicated issues to discuss in any context and reach an objective opinion on are God and personal experience. As individuals we are incapable of personally experiencing things which happen to somebody else, it is impossible. If we add this to the fact that religious experience is of the divine and the transcendent it becomes apparent that by its very nature it is extremely difficult to assess or comment on anything viewed as a 'religious experience'. One thing which may make it an easier phenomenon to understand is the theory that there is a common core to all these, this could be seen as something within the nature of religious experience such as a numinous feeling or the sheer individual quality, or something that happens after the event such as a drastic life change. ...read more.


However these are direct religious experiences, a person can also experience indirect religious occurrences, such as a numinous feeling which doesn't fit James' criteria as well. Another key aspect of religious experience is the after effects, the idea that as a result of such an experience one's life is changed. For the non believer this is usually conversion, and for somebody who already believed in God a religious experience would reinforce faith and perhaps inspire a deeper devotion. St Paul is perhaps the most famous biblical example of this; renowned for his persecution of Christians and a practicing Jew, Saul was converted upon seeing a vision of Christ on the road to Damascus. This experience fits James' description of religious experience to an extent, it was a passive experience, ineffable, brought new knowledge and a life change and was presumably transient. The complete change of individual central attitude within Paul was evident to himself and those around him. Other well known examples of converts include C. S Lewis and Tolstoy. Should the change of opinion and religious conviction of these people provide a 'common core'? Sociologists and Psychologists such as Jung would argue that there is perhaps a degree of repression and wish fulfilment, i.e. ...read more.


And so although experience is often used in the empirical sense that we can all objectively experience the same thing and see/hear/touch the same thing, in terms of religious experience it is not as earthly and transient, it is of something bigger that, although termed 'experience', is not as collective as the term suggests. Swinburne argued in his principle of credulity that unless we have no obvious reason to doubt someone, we should believe what they say, and thus by this principle we should take religious experience to be true. Yet although there may be a common core, some comparisons between religious experiences can appear contrived and there are anomalies, corporate experience for example contradicts the view that religious experience is individual. Ultimately, whether an experience is emotionally or psychologically motivated, a form of wish fulfilment or a genuine religious experience, it is self authenticating, real and objective to the person who has experienced it. However, Rudolf Otto described religious experience as 'an apprehension of the wholly other' and if this is taken to be true, one cannot gain any knowledge of something completely removed from everyday life from somebody else's experience, even if there are similarities between multiple experiences. Thus whether one person, or ten people, have an experience of God it is not cumulative, it does not make it any more believable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    Ayer changed the definition of verification because he concluded that his distinction between strong and weak verification was not a real distinction as the strong form of verification could not apply to any statement, and Ayer had come to the conclusion that some statements can be conclusively verified.

  2. Religious Experience - Edexel A2

    A J Taylor argues that have the presence of God semi-permanently or permanently in one's life also counts a religious experience; although not a singular event, God's presence as a guide in one's life can bring about a similar effect to a singular experience.

  1. "Plato does not value experience enough" Discuss

    We have to learn these things through our senses, and would not be able to know about, and picture, the horse before our release into the world. We also would have not learned any language through hearing it being spoken around us, making us unable to undergo complex reason in

  2. Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    Unfortunately many religious believers when faced with logical criticism do not alter their foundational beliefs, but merely irrationally change that which they believe to suit their foundations. For example a religious believer may have had an experience that made them feel a great sense of fear over an event that they believe is imminent.

  1. The idea of miracles is a major obstacle to faith in the modern world ...

    Swinburne's logic, however, could lead us all to accept supernatural claims of any sort, such as sightings of aliens, or a ham sandwich that could talk. It is interesting to note that the modern UFO cults have stories of being 'cured' of illness after an encounter with UFO occupants, just

  2. Evaluate the claim that corporate religious experience is no more than an illusion

    and passive (the experience is out of the person?s control). James concluded that religious experiences are psychological, that they do not just possess a physical element, but also a metaphysical one. James stated that he based his conclusion on three principles: empiricism (we interpret all our situations and the same

  1. Critically assess with reference to William James the arguments from religious experience.

    Firstly, the immediate impact which may be quite dramatic and involve visions and voices and may last a few minutes or hours. Secondly, the moral helpfulness of the experience, they usually involve a recognition that their current lifestyle is wrong or lacking in something.

  2. Conscience is innate. Discuss

    This conscience is developed as a result of parenting and upbringing. For example, saying ?please? and ?thank you? when addressing people. This happens when the conscience is immature and the consequences of an action determine whether it is right or wrong, so the child does not know if they have acted immorally until they have done the action.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work