• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Religious experience must be true because there is a common core to them all" Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


"Religious experience must be true because there is a common core to them all" Discuss. The Bible claims that God can be directly experienced and philosophers such as William James saw religion as essentially based on experience and that such experience should be the primary basis of study of religion as opposed to practices and dogma. Indeed many of the world's major religions are based on experience or revelation of the transcendent to mankind. Yet religious experience is intrinsically enormously subjective. Arguably two of the most complicated issues to discuss in any context and reach an objective opinion on are God and personal experience. As individuals we are incapable of personally experiencing things which happen to somebody else, it is impossible. If we add this to the fact that religious experience is of the divine and the transcendent it becomes apparent that by its very nature it is extremely difficult to assess or comment on anything viewed as a 'religious experience'. One thing which may make it an easier phenomenon to understand is the theory that there is a common core to all these, this could be seen as something within the nature of religious experience such as a numinous feeling or the sheer individual quality, or something that happens after the event such as a drastic life change. ...read more.


However these are direct religious experiences, a person can also experience indirect religious occurrences, such as a numinous feeling which doesn't fit James' criteria as well. Another key aspect of religious experience is the after effects, the idea that as a result of such an experience one's life is changed. For the non believer this is usually conversion, and for somebody who already believed in God a religious experience would reinforce faith and perhaps inspire a deeper devotion. St Paul is perhaps the most famous biblical example of this; renowned for his persecution of Christians and a practicing Jew, Saul was converted upon seeing a vision of Christ on the road to Damascus. This experience fits James' description of religious experience to an extent, it was a passive experience, ineffable, brought new knowledge and a life change and was presumably transient. The complete change of individual central attitude within Paul was evident to himself and those around him. Other well known examples of converts include C. S Lewis and Tolstoy. Should the change of opinion and religious conviction of these people provide a 'common core'? Sociologists and Psychologists such as Jung would argue that there is perhaps a degree of repression and wish fulfilment, i.e. ...read more.


And so although experience is often used in the empirical sense that we can all objectively experience the same thing and see/hear/touch the same thing, in terms of religious experience it is not as earthly and transient, it is of something bigger that, although termed 'experience', is not as collective as the term suggests. Swinburne argued in his principle of credulity that unless we have no obvious reason to doubt someone, we should believe what they say, and thus by this principle we should take religious experience to be true. Yet although there may be a common core, some comparisons between religious experiences can appear contrived and there are anomalies, corporate experience for example contradicts the view that religious experience is individual. Ultimately, whether an experience is emotionally or psychologically motivated, a form of wish fulfilment or a genuine religious experience, it is self authenticating, real and objective to the person who has experienced it. However, Rudolf Otto described religious experience as 'an apprehension of the wholly other' and if this is taken to be true, one cannot gain any knowledge of something completely removed from everyday life from somebody else's experience, even if there are similarities between multiple experiences. Thus whether one person, or ten people, have an experience of God it is not cumulative, it does not make it any more believable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    Flew suggested that God died a 'death by a thousand qualifications'. By this phrase, flew meant that when religious believer is challenged about the existence of God, or God's nature, their response is to modifying their statements about God so much when challenged, that statements no longer resemble the original claim about God.

  2. The idea of miracles is a major obstacle to faith in the modern world ...

    Swinburne's logic, however, could lead us all to accept supernatural claims of any sort, such as sightings of aliens, or a ham sandwich that could talk. It is interesting to note that the modern UFO cults have stories of being 'cured' of illness after an encounter with UFO occupants, just

  1. Conscience is innate. Discuss

    They are also less dependent on the authority of the people around them and are able to distinguish between right and wrong for themselves. This is clearly a developmental approach to conscience, not a religious one which claims that it is innate.

  2. Critically assess with reference to William James the arguments from religious experience.

    are fundamentally identical. In addition, most religions make claims that conflict with each other, for example, Christians claim that Jesus is the Son of God whereas Muslims claim Jesus was simply a prophet who did not die on the cross and Jews reject Jesus? divinity.

  1. Discuss the issue that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    Just as John Wisdom?s parable of the gardener shows how a religious belief is unfalsifiable, a religious experience contains the same inherent flaw. Whereas the analysis of scientific theory is absolutely necessary and exists permanently, there is not the same necessary level of analysis needed.

  2. Philosophy - analysis of Nietzsche, Sartre and Tolstoy

    We find Tolstoy's theory/belief of Peasants having a meaningful life not valid because like every person, neither rich or poor everyone suffers. He could've found meaning in his life elsewhere, such as his family, reputation. More things in the world to explore.

  1. Explain what a study of Religious Experience may reveal about the nature of God. ...

    The religious experience seems to reveal some information or knowledge which is ?Unobtainable by the intellect alone? (Cole). It is a revelation gained through the mystical experience and the only answer to it seems to be God. Bernadette of Lourdes asked the vision she saw, who she was and the vision replied that she was the ?Immaculate Conception?.

  2. How Can the Religious View Be Defended As a Way of Seeing the World?

    the religious perspective involves a creator or the world, yet we?ve never actually experience the creator making this world or any other worlds. In addition to Hume, In Flew?s adaption of John Wisdoms parable of the invisible gardener, he tries to show that the religious view cannot be defended as a way of seeing the world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work