• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Shakespeare's Purpose in Subverting the "Moral Universe" in Hamlet, Measure for Measure, and the Henriad.

Extracts from this document...


5/8/07 7:39:27 PM Michelle Wendt Intro to Shakespeare Fall 2003 Professor Tomkins Shakespeare's Purpose in Subverting the "Moral Universe" in Hamlet, Measure for Measure, and the Henriad The inverted "moral universe"i in Shakespearean drama was a demonstration of the increased reality that ancestral and collective foundations were losing their sanctified nature. Key upheavals were taking place and the world of Shakespeare was evolving from a time where "the earth was still the center of the universe,ii" towards a life of societal instability. Like all playwrights, Shakespeare's ideas for plot were partly a reflection of the world in which he lived. The enlightenment was a time where religion was giving way to science and economic gain. It would be unreasonable for such a reflective dramatist to omit the implications and limitations of the times in his work. The regulations and boundaries for human conduct are not always clear, especially in times of fluctuation. While I would not maintain "moral universe" is a dominant theme in Shakespeare's work, I do argue that it is a somewhat significant current running through many of his plays. To define any one "moral universe" in the work is folly, each play deserves many separate definitions. Collective morality goes through an alteration according to the circumstances of each group of characters. Situational ethics play a role in determining the behavior of Shakespeare's characters, especially in the history plays. ...read more.


The Henriad is the clearest illustration of situational ethics in the works of Shakespeare. In his plays, the act of killing a king or subverting a king's power (A Midsummer Night's Dream) destabilizes the universe. In addition, each character feels justified in his or hers own actions. There is a lack of a conventional biblical "moral universe" in Henry IV, I and II; the persistent motif in these plays is that most of the characters are bent on servicing their own ends. The reality that an archbishop would consent to a revolt against the ruler is an obvious indication that the state of the" moral universe" is on its head. This might not have happened had Henry IV been a ruler by divine right. As the head of state, he set the tone of the universe. Since he interrupted the lines of succession; he left himself open to more of the same when his own past came back to haunt his rule. The constant uprisings are also taking place in Shakespeare's sector. During the performance of the plays, Elizabeth was fending off rebellions of her own. The characters in the Henriad also are deficient in morality. As in Measure for Measure, most of the characters are flawed, not just the hero. Both Hotspur and Henry fail to see their moral shortcomings. Integrity crumbles because the idea on which it is based is shallow. ...read more.


Humanity was moving away from absolutism to relativism and nihilism. Situational ethics played a strong role in his work in the lives and choices of his characters. Instead of using magic as the weight to unbalance the universe, he used morality and ethics as literary devices to throw his created worlds into chaos. When the "moral universe" was out of order, the rules of society became indistinct. Shakespeare forced certain characters to undertake journeys for enlightenment to restore the "moral universe." His function in destabilizing the "moral universe" was to emphasize the unnaturalness of the actions of his characters. i Term "moral universe" introduced by Professor Tomkins, Fall 2003 ii Donahue conversation iii Simms lecture Effect of the Reformation on the Renaissance in England iv Tom Bishop http://www.shaksper.net/archives/1998/1276.html SHAKSPER, the international electronic conference. v A Critical Look at Situation Ethics by WayneJackson. vi How moral is war, consider who gains, a few titled men are the only people who will actually benefit along with a host of knights, who fight for glory and pay in their protected Armour. But the reality is that the serfs will be the one to pay- their lands taxed, their farms and villages burnt and the men killed. All because they live in the region of certain lords, they will fight, no matter what the cost. Their situation remains static no matter who wears the crown, until they get a king who knows how to avoid war, restore a collective moral universe, and rule as a political leader instead of a barbarian. (Wendt) vii Tomkins lecture, November 2003. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    Another issue is equal employment opportunities for everyone. Although a lot has been done to destroy the system that kept women and minorities away from the top management positions, many corporations still rely on white men's stereotypes and prejudice. Women are considered just as accessories for men and are not treated equally.

  2. Deontology - looking for an objective basis to ground all moral action.

    He concludes that there is only one thing that is truly good: "Nothing in the world-indeed nothing even beyond the world-can possibly be conceived which could be called good without qualification except a good will." - Kant Kant then argues that the consequences of an act of willing cannot be

  1. Utilitarianism is unjust

    But without any negative experiences to base our decisions, those things would just become the norm and not satisfactory. Based on the above reasoning, Harwood's objection to utilitarianism concerning the experience machine is flawed. Harwood objects to utilitarianism through the objection of entering the experience machine.

  2. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    There is one stunning question that must be asked of these people: If you were standing before Jesus Christ himself, could you possibly tell him how and why you support the death penalty; do you think you could make Christ believe and support such ideals?

  1. Expalin the concept of Moral Relativism

    what is moral changes depending on the action that is most loving in the circumstances. Fletcher based his ideas on that of Augustine who reduced the Christian ethic to a single principle, "dilige et quod vis, fac" meaning, love with care and then what you will do.

  2. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    A vegetative state with vital signs is a sanctified vegetative state to SL. The SL proponent never faces a dilemma whether to save or not to save, unless not all can be saved. But SL proponents do face the theoretical question whether the vital signs, whether biological vitality alone, can

  1. Religious and/or moral principles are a hindrance with medical ethics. Examine and comment on ...

    Or is it the woman who?s granting life and stability? This is a vivid and strong addition to the argument of the rights of the mother for it presents the idea that women should have the choice of what to do with their bodies.

  2. Does the "War on Terror" mean the just war doctrine is dead?

    One objection was if time was given to open up dialogue between the United States and Afghanistan, then that would give the Al Qaeda an opening to better prepare defences against an American invasion. Although this was not possible because the Clinton administration had already banned all sales of military

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work