• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Situation Ethics and Moral Decision Making.

Extracts from this document...


Explain the approach of situations ethics to moral decision making * Origins of the theory in New Testament teaching and development by Fletcher in the 1960s * The central role of love in the theory and the rejection of legalistic approaches to morality * The teleological nature of the theory * Development of key principles associated with the theory, such as the rejection of casuistry, the four working principles and the six fundamental principles * Examples of application of the theory to ethical issues Situation Ethics is an ethical theory which maintains that something is moral if it follows the most loving course of action. The theory was developed by Joseph Fletcher, a professor who was heavily influenced by New Testament teachings, thus making Situation Ethics a religious theory. The theory is follows a teleological approach and is therefore based on the consequences of our actions as opposed to the actions themselves. In contrast to other theories, Natural Law as a suitable example, Situation Ethics is a relativist theory. Basically decisions are made based on the particular circumstance and may vary. On the whole, the situationist decides themselves what they believe to be the most loving course of action. It is a non legalistic theory with no moral absolutes or fixed rules, but rather based upon one solid principle, love. ...read more.


Relativism maintains that there are no fixed rules or moral absolutes, and each circumstance varies so decisions should be made at the moment. Furthermore, the third principle Fletcher stated was personalism, which emphasises the need to put people before rules, and that personal relationships are more important. Last of all, there is positivism, which states that faith in Christ is voluntary, and that once one chooses to follow Christ they then can follow his guidelines and live by his standards. The six fundamental principles were the last set of key principles added by Fletcher. These principles form Situation Ethics. The first one is that ?Love is always good?, which basically means that if people are helpful, then it is moral, however if they hurt people the action is immoral. Next there is ?Love is the ruling norm? which basically means that love replaces legalism, such as Paul replacing the Torah with love. Following this, there is ?love and justice are the same?, here Fletcher is basically saying that love depends on justice, just as justice depends on love. The fourth principle is ?Love your neighbour?, which means that agape should be given to all, and one should not always expect in back. Furthermore, there is ?the end justifies the means? which refers back to Situation Ethics being a teleological theory, based on our consequences. ...read more.


Although lives would be lost in the process of dropping the bomb, it is loving in that many more lives would be saved. Situation Ethics keeps is central focus on love when making all decisions., which therefore means it somewhat rejects legalism approaches to morality. Overall, Joseph Fletcher felt that there were only three general approaches to ethics, which include the legalistic approach, the antinomian or lawless approach, and the situational approach. Even though Fletcher did accept the role of human reason in moral decision making, he felt that approaches like that of Natural Law were too legalistic and on most occasions human need should be given first place to rules. This was influenced by Jesus? criticism of the Pharisees legalism in the Gospels of the Bible. Vardy and Grosch comment that because Jesus ?attacked the Pharisees? insistence on following the Jewish Law cannot and should not lay down any law. When they do, they become more like Pharisees.? However, in saying this, Fletcher also rejected antinomian approaches to moral decision making, as he felt that those who took a purely hedonistic approach had too much moral freedom. This is how Fletcher attempted to produce a theory which was between legalism and antinomianism- ?Fletcher maintained that there was a middle way between legalism and antinomianism and this lay in the application of agape, the love that Jesus commanded. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Compare and contrast the ethical theories of natural law and situation ethics.

    It is at points such as this that the basic natural law approach begins to fall apart. In this day and age it is becoming increasingly difficult to apply absolute moral laws to every situation that arises. On the basis of the principle, it could be argued that it is

  2. Examine the key features of situation ethics, and the main criticisms of it, and ...

    Just the same he is prepared in any situation to compromise them or set them aside in the situation if love seems better served by doing so". Fletcher developed his theory by drawing on a wide range of cases that could not be resolved by applying fixed rules and principles;

  1. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    Ashland's actions breached that duty and had a duty of care to the community. The company did act in accordance with this duty when it promptly authorized expenditures for the cleanup, paid for a temporary pipe to be laid across the spill to get water from the Allegheny River, and flew in Coast Guard on the company planes.

  2. Compare Utilitarianism With Kant's Theory of The Categorical Imperative And Explain Which You Think ...

    For example, a homeless man finds a wallet containing �50. He knows the wallet belongs to a very rich man who will barely notice it is missing. Thus, following the theory of Utilitarianism, it is better for the man to keep the wallet than return it, because he will received

  1. 'Some religious ethics are too rigid for moral decision making. Discuss

    Moreover, the Church of England will argue the at the fundamental principle of agape means that on occasions we need to do things that in less extreme circumstances would be regarded as wrong. For example in the case of abortion the absolute prohibition of killing (exodus 20)

  2. Medical Ethics And Organ Transplants

    This would mean that someone who does higher pleasures more frequently would be more worthy of an organ. Many also argue that by looking at Quality of Life when choosing who should receive an organ would result in a discrimination of the old.

  1. Kantian ethics provides a helpful method to making moral decisions

    To counteract these faults Kant put in place a second law, the law of wills. This stated that for something to become a duty it must be desirable for the population. This rule however, also has faults. In order for a rule to satisfy an entire population (and if this

  2. Explain the approach of Situation Ethics to moral decision making.

    It is the view that humans define their own meaning in life, and try to make rational decisions despite existing in an irrational universe. Fletcher accepted that there should be moral rules and guidelines. Moral rules can inform choice but they are secondary to the primary aim of love.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work