• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Socrates also refers to himself as a gadfly because he bites, and buzzes at the self-satisfied, which, indebted them to consider matters of virtue.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Socrates "And now, Athenians, I am not going to argue for my sake, as you may think, but for yours, that you may not sin against the god, or lightly reject his favor by condemning me. For if you kill me you will not easily find another like me, who, if I may use such a ludicrous figure of speech, am a sort of gadfly, given to the state by the god; and the state is like a great and noble steed who is tardy in his motions owing to his very size, and requires to be stirred into life."(Socrates, The Apology) Socrates also refers to himself as a gadfly because he bites, and buzzes at the self-satisfied, which, indebted them to consider matters of virtue. He is also like a gadfly because he is likely to get swatted away because of his "bite" or words of wisdom. ...read more.

Middle

Socrates is like a gadfly because he pesters his objects or people to hopelessness. He asked so many questions and his questions were so profound and intense, that many people became annoyed at him because they probably could not answer them because they were either too scared to answer them (because they knew that Socrates would probably ask another question on top of the first question if they were able to answer it), or they were just to confused to answer the question Socrates had asked. When Socrates referred himself to a gadfly, it opened up a window to new generations of philosophers who, acted like gadflies themselves. Everywhere we look, we see humanity's philosophical side waking up. People nowa days are asking more questions. I think one of the biggest philosophical questions is where did we come from? ...read more.

Conclusion

On the other hand, people who listen to philosophers or go against them, sometimes are rude, they are ignorant, and they don't understand the point a philosopher is trying to make. The conduct of philosophy depends on the person and how they view things. The conduct of philosophy is like the conduct of gadflies because many people get annoyed by the philosophers because of their questions. By how in depth the questions are and by how many questions the philosophers ask. Some people think that philosophers are bothersome. In conclusion, I think all of these things and other things help to define what philosophy is today. If we didn't have people like Socrates and Plato and other great philosophers, where would we be to day in the realm of philosophy? Would people actually want or learn to question certain subjects? I think that if they hadn't ever been born, then we wouldn't think for our selves, or think great thoughts. We would be living in a pretty boring world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Outline the main features of virtue ethic

    this weakness up is that although it does provide general guidance on how to be a good person presumably a totally virtuous person would know what to do and we could consider them a suitable role model to guide us through actions and situations.

  2. The Rebirth of Dialogue: Bakhtin, Socrates, and the Rhetorical Tradition by James P. Zappen. ...

    The thrust of Zappen's argument in these first three chapters is that Socrates embodies aspects of Bakhtin's concept of dialogue and that Plato, as the author of Socratic dialogues, prefigures the work of the polyphonic novelist. The essential foundation for these claims is that Bakhtin himself engaged the work of Plato in his Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics.

  1. Can computers think?

    that Turing is willing therefore to dismiss any other machine's ability to think. However, at this point we must remember Turing's original purpose which was to find out if it is possible for a machine to think. His test was not designed to test for the ability to think within any machine, but whether one such machine could exist.

  2. Introduction to Philosophy.

    This lead to the stability of being. * He stated that senses are not reliable. * Logic --> a thing that can be true and false at the same time. The difference between thought and sense : Thought Sense Ideas Sensory point Concepts Intellect Show that there is change Therefore the conclusion of Parmenides is that senses must be based on thoughts to be correct .

  1. A Critical Analysis of Lao Tzu's Tao Teh Ching - Chineses philosophy.

    All creatures depend on it, And it denies nothing to anyone. It does its work, But it makes no claims for itself. It clothes and feeds all, But it does not lord over them [...] All things return to it as to their home ..."10 With tao as the fundamental

  2. What Matters.

    Is the any valid reason for understanding more? If happiness and fulfillment in life are simply doing what allows us to survive to the next day are they even worth the while of working for them?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work