• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Subjectivism as an Ethical Theory

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

SUBJECTIVISM While ethical relativism comes in many shapes, its most individualistic expression is ethical subjectivism. It argues that the criteria for what is considered morally right or wrong is 'the individual's perceptions, opinions, experiences, inclinations, and desires.' Ethical subjectivism denies the existence of universal moral codes. It views ethics as being private, individual, and subjective in nature. The subjectivist treats morality like taste or aesthetic judgements and would typically say 'morality, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder' but its most descriptive statement might be 'whatever a person thinks is right is right' Ernest Hemmingway wrote 'so far, about morals, I know only that what is moral is what you feel good after and what is immoral is what you feel bad after and judged by these moral standards, which I do not defend, the bullfight is very moral to me because I feel very fine while it is going on ...read more.

Middle

Suppose John torturing a child repulses you. You cannot say that it wrong for John to torture people according to subjectivism, because John personally likes it. The only basis for judging him wrong is if he was a hypocrite who told others it was wrong to torture people. However, suppose it was his principle that hypocrisy is morally permissible (he feels very fine about it), so that it would be impossible for him to do wrong. Subjectivism may even argue that Adolph Hitler and Ted Bundy (serial killer) are as moral as Gandhi, if each lived to his own moral standards, whatever those might be. Ted Bundy once justified his murder when talking to one of his victims, just before he raped and murdered her. '...In any case, let me assure you, my dear young lady, that there is absolutely no comparison between the pleasure I might take in eating ham and the pleasure ...read more.

Conclusion

Subjectivity implicitly assumes something of this solipsism, an atomism in which isolated individuals make up separate universes. Subjectivism treats people as billiard balls on a societal pool table where they meet only in radical collisions, each aimed at his or her own goal and striving to do the others before they do him or her in. However, this is belied by the fact humans create societies and families where they support each other and help one another; where we share a common language, common institutions and similar rituals and habits. As John Donne once wrote 'No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent' Subjectivism has some strength in that firstly, it reflects the close relationship between morality and people's feelings and opinions. Indeed, it can cope with the contradictory moral values we find ourselves fighting with. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    This can be universalised and it does not seem to fit Kant's criteria for a non- universaliable maxim. However, we cannot say this maxim is moral by any sense. In Kantian Ethics, motive and good will are important. Nothing in the world can possible be conceived which could be called good without the qualification except good.

  2. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    The Vienna Circle outlined the task for philosophy, "To move forward by establishing the criteria for talking meaningfully about the world." Logical Positivism argues that philosophy is entirely about establishing the means by which the truth or falsehood of certain propositions can be demonstrated.

  1. Ethical Criticism of McDonalds

    The success of McDonald's was not just within the USA, but also globally, which became important when the US market became saturated. 'The first British restaurant opened in 1974' (Baker, 2005) and today there are more than 1200 restaurants in the UK, employing 73,000 people' (Caterer-online.com, 2004).

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    In essence, the world has been tied together ever tighter, and with the growth of communications with the internet, we are living in a world which is becoming increasingly culturally integrated. Our ideas are becoming global in the modern world.

  1. Describe Kant’s theory of duty as the basis for morality.

    who has come to kill an innocent person you are hiding in your home. This obviously shows Kant's principle of universal law as impractical. It also contradicts with Kant's idea that 'humans are ends in themselves'- as shouldn't you do everything possible to save the person's life?

  2. Relativist Ethical Theory

    Traditional Christian thinkers rejected situation ethics. In 1952, Pope Pius XII called situation ethics 'an individualistic and subjective appeal to the concrete circumstances of actions to justify decisions in opposition to the natural law or God's revealed will'. The Roman Catholic Church teaches St Aquina's natural law approach, and views situation ethics as a subjective and individualistic moral approach.

  1. does universial morality exist?

    It is easy to see the good and view the world as an absolutist one. For example, as children we are taught that lying is wrong no matter what. Humans tend to develop a tolerance to lying through experience and the knowledge to rationalize lying.

  2. Capital Punishment - analyse the views of Ernest van den Haag and Hugo Adam ...

    In congruence to his stand on abolition Bedau then argues that there is no reason for choosing the death penalty when a lesser punishment can be just as effective. After discussing capital punishment as a deterrent and the risks of executing innocent people that it creates, Bedau presents a different

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work