• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Subjectivism as an Ethical Theory

Extracts from this document...


SUBJECTIVISM While ethical relativism comes in many shapes, its most individualistic expression is ethical subjectivism. It argues that the criteria for what is considered morally right or wrong is 'the individual's perceptions, opinions, experiences, inclinations, and desires.' Ethical subjectivism denies the existence of universal moral codes. It views ethics as being private, individual, and subjective in nature. The subjectivist treats morality like taste or aesthetic judgements and would typically say 'morality, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder' but its most descriptive statement might be 'whatever a person thinks is right is right' Ernest Hemmingway wrote 'so far, about morals, I know only that what is moral is what you feel good after and what is immoral is what you feel bad after and judged by these moral standards, which I do not defend, the bullfight is very moral to me because I feel very fine while it is going on ...read more.


Suppose John torturing a child repulses you. You cannot say that it wrong for John to torture people according to subjectivism, because John personally likes it. The only basis for judging him wrong is if he was a hypocrite who told others it was wrong to torture people. However, suppose it was his principle that hypocrisy is morally permissible (he feels very fine about it), so that it would be impossible for him to do wrong. Subjectivism may even argue that Adolph Hitler and Ted Bundy (serial killer) are as moral as Gandhi, if each lived to his own moral standards, whatever those might be. Ted Bundy once justified his murder when talking to one of his victims, just before he raped and murdered her. '...In any case, let me assure you, my dear young lady, that there is absolutely no comparison between the pleasure I might take in eating ham and the pleasure ...read more.


Subjectivity implicitly assumes something of this solipsism, an atomism in which isolated individuals make up separate universes. Subjectivism treats people as billiard balls on a societal pool table where they meet only in radical collisions, each aimed at his or her own goal and striving to do the others before they do him or her in. However, this is belied by the fact humans create societies and families where they support each other and help one another; where we share a common language, common institutions and similar rituals and habits. As John Donne once wrote 'No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent' Subjectivism has some strength in that firstly, it reflects the close relationship between morality and people's feelings and opinions. Indeed, it can cope with the contradictory moral values we find ourselves fighting with. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Emotivism as an Ethical Theory

    The Vienna Circle outlined the task for philosophy, "To move forward by establishing the criteria for talking meaningfully about the world." Logical Positivism argues that philosophy is entirely about establishing the means by which the truth or falsehood of certain propositions can be demonstrated.

  2. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    Voluntary euthanasia, by definition, is the intentional killing of a person for euthanasiast reasons, carried out at the request of a person, prompted by the sense that continued existence is no longer worthwhile. Kant argued that suicide was wrong because it would be contrary to the universal duty (or moral law)

  1. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    The argument is that moral principles should not be affected by states and state boundaries. The differences between the ideals and the reality of sovereign states have been greatly affected by globalisation, and the emergence of the arguments for cosmopolitan morality. Globalisation has affected the key structures of state sovereignty.

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    However, some feel that NBAC failed to take a true moral stance against cloning. Rather than call for a complete ban on cloning, the commission suggested that cloning be postponed until the technology becomes feasible. This seems to suggest that there is no one overarching view of cloning that can be applied to the United States as a whole.

  1. Ethical Criticism of McDonalds

    The first McDonald's restaurant opened on April 15th 1955, in Des Plaines, Illinois by an entrepreneur called Ray Kroc. Kroc had been attracted by a limited menu hamburger stand that turned out high-quality fast food at low prices, run by a pair of brothers, Dick and Mac McDonald.

  2. Describe Kant’s theory of duty as the basis for morality.

    Yet, if the shopkeeper did not make any effort, and gave an honest but rude service, he would not make any profit at all. This shows how Kant's theory is not satisfactory for practical purposes, as it is often hard to always act morally right.

  1. Relativist Ethical Theory

    Traditional Christian thinkers rejected situation ethics. In 1952, Pope Pius XII called situation ethics 'an individualistic and subjective appeal to the concrete circumstances of actions to justify decisions in opposition to the natural law or God's revealed will'. The Roman Catholic Church teaches St Aquina's natural law approach, and views situation ethics as a subjective and individualistic moral approach.

  2. Capital Punishment - analyse the views of Ernest van den Haag and Hugo Adam ...

    This fails to show that the death penalty is a better deterrent than the less severe penalty of long-term imprisonment for the crime of murder. Bedau then reinforces this by concluding that if death penalty and long-term imprisonment have an equal effectiveness or ineffectiveness as deterrents to murder, then arguing for capital punishment as deterring murder is flawed and weakened.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work