• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

summary of the design argument

Extracts from this document...


Examine the main strengths and weaknesses of the design argument for the existence of God. (21 marks) The design argument , otherwise known as the teleological argument, for many people provides a strong basis for belief in the existence of God. It is an a posteriori argument as it is based on experience and observation. The argument demands that there are certain features within our universe that display strong, deliberate design that could not be the result of mere coincidence. The teleological argument believes that this conscious and almost calculated design can only be explained by the presence of an intelligent and personal designer. For countless people, this is God. There are various well-known forms of the teleological argument and I will touch upon what I consider to be the most vital, in order to examine the main strengths and weakness of this argument as a claim for God's existence. To begin with I will look to the works of Thomas Aquinas in order to strengthen the teleological argument as a proof of God's existence. In his most famous work, "Summa Theologica" he provides five ways for the existence of God, in which he believes God is revealing true qualities. ...read more.


Upon stumbling across a watch, built with such complex and calculated design, you would have to infer that it had a designer- Paley maintains that we must also infer that our intricate world must have a designer. Paley explains how the world is made up of such detailed parts, all of which work towards a goal for the benefit of the whole. William Paley's theory is a strong one as it demonstrates how all of the small adaptations in nature are proof of an intelligent designer. Expanding on William Paley's theory; even the atheist philosopher David Hume acknowledged that "A purpose, an intention, a design, strikes everywhere the most careless, the most stupid thinker". We must acknowledge the immense design and order in our universe, and this is the strongest proof of God's existence. F R Tennant would have agreed as he said that the rules and natural laws of science and maths, show the world to be orderly and not chaotic. Tennant explained that things appear so precisely that they suggest deliberate design, "fluke or fortuitous events can be ruled out". Also, any signs of chaos are simply consequences of a rule maker ensuring that everything in the universe can be explained rationally. ...read more.


Therefore religious beliefs about the existence of God arise from a natural desire to blame natural problems on invisible forces, instead of examining them scientifically or at least rationally. To expand, Kant argued that it is human nature to impose order upon things. As humans we try to look for order and regularity, we would impose order on whatever universe we were in, be it orderly or chaotic. A main weakness of the design argument is the acknowledgement of universal design but the dismissal of a God-imposed design. Aside from all else mentioned, it is so very obvious that the design argument can only be seen as flawed when considering Darwin's theory of evolution. Evolution, science and natural selection outweigh any possibility of a designer of any kind. Evolution provides us with a much more verifiable and rational account of how the universe and all species within it display order and purpose. Science provides a more logical account of creation compared to the design argument because it holds no responsibility of the imperfections in the world. Whereas the design argument is contrary to the classical theistic view of God; if there is a conscious designer of our universe (God) then He cannot be omniscient and benevolent. He cannot be classical theistic God. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    Secondly Swinburne saw that if the world was like a vegetable then it does not explain the fact that laws of nature have operated all across time, such as gravity and show far more complexity than a developing vegetable. He also disagrees on the concept that an effect only has

  2. Assess the view that the design argument provides a convincing proof for the existence ...

    there is no one else we know of who could be the designer, we should except that the designer is probably God. Additionally, one of Hume's proposals was that the designer needn't be incorpeal, and instead asked, 'why can it not be a perfect human?'

  1. Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

    that there is a logical jump in Paley's argument that doesn't actually have to be made. John Stuart Mill said that due to the sheer amount of evil in the universe such as disease and natural disasters, he came to the conclusion that God cant be both omnipotent and benevolent but just benevolent.

  2. The Design Argument

    Paley did not believe the universe could appear by chance as a result of, 'one of many possible material forms'. In the modern day, the Anthropic Principle has become a modern version of the Design Argument. Tennant developed the anthropic principle in 1930.

  1. Critically assess the design argument

    He used this argument to claim that there must have been something (an unmoved mover) that started everything and caused it to move, he decided the only possible explanation could be God because he is eternally existent. Another of his arguments regarding the debate about design is his illustration of

  2. "The design argument is challenged far more by science than by philosophy." Discuss with ...

    Darwin's theory removes the entire need for God and gives an explanation of the world that removes the need for him. Darwin (and Richard Dawkins afterwards) have said that natural selection is just random and is not intended and designed.

  1. Sartre is a very strong proponent of strong determinism, that is, he does not ...

    in order to manifest itself as adverse or helpful.2 This particular allegory seems to scream of the importance of how we can turn any sort of empirical obstacle into a preliminary choice that would help us form subsequent choices. For instance, if our goal was not to move the mountain

  2. A Critical Analysis of Lao Tzu's Tao Teh Ching - Chineses philosophy.

    concept, the Chinese regard life as a process of refinement, comparable to learning to write well-formed characters in the art of calligraphy. The art of cooking is also often used as an example of harmonious order in Chinese philosophical literature.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work