• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

summary of the design argument

Extracts from this document...


Examine the main strengths and weaknesses of the design argument for the existence of God. (21 marks) The design argument , otherwise known as the teleological argument, for many people provides a strong basis for belief in the existence of God. It is an a posteriori argument as it is based on experience and observation. The argument demands that there are certain features within our universe that display strong, deliberate design that could not be the result of mere coincidence. The teleological argument believes that this conscious and almost calculated design can only be explained by the presence of an intelligent and personal designer. For countless people, this is God. There are various well-known forms of the teleological argument and I will touch upon what I consider to be the most vital, in order to examine the main strengths and weakness of this argument as a claim for God's existence. To begin with I will look to the works of Thomas Aquinas in order to strengthen the teleological argument as a proof of God's existence. In his most famous work, "Summa Theologica" he provides five ways for the existence of God, in which he believes God is revealing true qualities. ...read more.


Upon stumbling across a watch, built with such complex and calculated design, you would have to infer that it had a designer- Paley maintains that we must also infer that our intricate world must have a designer. Paley explains how the world is made up of such detailed parts, all of which work towards a goal for the benefit of the whole. William Paley's theory is a strong one as it demonstrates how all of the small adaptations in nature are proof of an intelligent designer. Expanding on William Paley's theory; even the atheist philosopher David Hume acknowledged that "A purpose, an intention, a design, strikes everywhere the most careless, the most stupid thinker". We must acknowledge the immense design and order in our universe, and this is the strongest proof of God's existence. F R Tennant would have agreed as he said that the rules and natural laws of science and maths, show the world to be orderly and not chaotic. Tennant explained that things appear so precisely that they suggest deliberate design, "fluke or fortuitous events can be ruled out". Also, any signs of chaos are simply consequences of a rule maker ensuring that everything in the universe can be explained rationally. ...read more.


Therefore religious beliefs about the existence of God arise from a natural desire to blame natural problems on invisible forces, instead of examining them scientifically or at least rationally. To expand, Kant argued that it is human nature to impose order upon things. As humans we try to look for order and regularity, we would impose order on whatever universe we were in, be it orderly or chaotic. A main weakness of the design argument is the acknowledgement of universal design but the dismissal of a God-imposed design. Aside from all else mentioned, it is so very obvious that the design argument can only be seen as flawed when considering Darwin's theory of evolution. Evolution, science and natural selection outweigh any possibility of a designer of any kind. Evolution provides us with a much more verifiable and rational account of how the universe and all species within it display order and purpose. Science provides a more logical account of creation compared to the design argument because it holds no responsibility of the imperfections in the world. Whereas the design argument is contrary to the classical theistic view of God; if there is a conscious designer of our universe (God) then He cannot be omniscient and benevolent. He cannot be classical theistic God. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Critically assess the design argument

    The anthropic principle was famously developed by Tennant. This principle is an argument that states the universe must have been planned; this is because it is far too coincidental that human life is able to survive in such unlikely circumstances. This causes many theists to claim it must have been planned by God.

  2. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    However, Hume's criticism of the cause-effect connection seems illogical and irrational. Isaac Newton's first law of inertia dictates that an external force must be applied to an object in order for that object to move, and hence states that the external force (cause)

  1. A Critical Analysis of Lao Tzu's Tao Teh Ching - Chineses philosophy.

    Another interesting feature in TTC is that practice of non-ado may actually discourage people to seek knowledge, for "in the old days, those who were well versed in the practice of the Tao did not try to enlighten the people, but rather to keep them in the state of simplicity.

  2. Assess the view that the design argument provides a convincing proof for the existence ...

    Also, it is easy for one to see that the universe is more than a simply orderly structure - rather it features some things that are just beneficial, not necessary. These beneficial concepts vary from the feelings one experiences when 'in love' to the positive affect a beautiful landscape can have upon each of us.

  1. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    The second of Hume's criticisms only weakens his first; he himself then uses the analogy of the world being like a vegetable and less mechanical. Hume (as Philo) suggests that the world grows of its own accord through nature therefore does not have a designer unless it is extremely similar to a human object.

  2. Sartre is a very strong proponent of strong determinism, that is, he does not ...

    Even if these acts can be explained through medical terms (i.e. the body began producing excess amounts of certain chemicals), the trigger to that medical occurrence was the person's will. Through sheer mental force, they altered their body's natural tendencies in order to better reach their goals.

  1. Outline one version of the design argument for the existence of God

    The argument that "Natural Theology" puts forward runs as follows: "In crossing a heath suppose I pitched my foot against a stone, and were asked how that stone came to be there, I might possibly answer, that, for anything I knew to the contrary, it had lain there forever; nor

  2. The Design Argument

    We could fairly assume that such a complex design adapted to the purpose of showing the time did not come about by chance, but was the result of an intelligent design from a designer. Paley said that the universe is like a watch, and that it is clearly designed, even if we do not know its exact purpose.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work