• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

teleological argument

Extracts from this document...


1 (b) (i) What are the strengths and weaknesses of the design argument for the existence of God? 1(b) (ii) Comment on the view that the weaknesses are more convincing than the strengths? The design argument, known as the Teleological argument, comes from the Greek word 'Telos' which means purpose. The basic premise, of all teleological arguments for the existence of God, is that the world exhibits an intelligent purpose based on experience from nature such as its order, unity, coherency, design and complexity. Hence, there must be an intelligent designer to account for the observed intelligent purpose and order that we can observe. Philosophers use the design features of purpose, regularity and order in the world for proof of a designer i.e. the God of classical theism. William Paley put forward the most famous argument in a book called 'Natural Theology', and argues from 'design qua purpose' and 'design qua regularity'. From design qua purpose, Paley argues that the world has purpose, which shows evidence of design, therefore there must be a designer i.e. God. This is echoed in the bible where it says, "For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. ...read more.


The conditions in the world are so precise and perfect, that any change in them would cause disaster as life is fragile, therefore there has to be a designer; God. A designer (God) must have given us the ability to sustain life. In addition the world has rules, which impose natural order, which without these there would be chaos. The three points mentioned above, the ability to recognise order, the ability to sustain life and the ability to evolve are the points that are known as the anthropic principle. Swinburne holds that the complexity of the universe is unlikely to be the result of chance. He regards God as the creator and designer as a more simple and probable explanation. This way of thinking can be paralleled to Ockham's Razor. This is the idea that the simplest explanation is the most likely one. Tenant also believed that God gave us the ability to appreciate beauty such as music and the natural world. Therefore, the beauty of the world points to God as a creator. However, the world is not perfect, there are too many faults such as natural disasters for there to be a designer (God). Lots of random coincidence from evolution would lead to faults. ...read more.


This echoes Herbert Spencer who said that it was down to the "Survival of the fittest", not of a God who is a designer. However this doesn't disprove the existence of God as a designer as he may have designed the 'fittest' 'well-adapted' creatures in the world. Richard Dawkins said that changes in DNA are random and leads to diversity in nature. He also proposed a blind watchmaker, as nature and evolution are blind to design. However God may have been the one to give us the ability to evolve. In conclusion, if there was an overgrown garden with beautiful flowers, some would say there must be a gardener to maintain the flowers. On the other hand, some would say there cannot be a gardener because why would there be weeds? This is in line with the design argument as it is down to interpretation and faith. The strengths don't necessarily prove God because it is down to experience and "personal taste" (Paul Davies), which we cannot prove. It is therefore a posteriori and an inductive argument. It is furthermore only probable that God exists due to the design argument, as there is no proof only probability. Therefore the weaknesses are more convincing than the strengths. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The design argument is also known as the teleological argument. The argument looks at ...

    3 star(s)

    Further, It appears to be beautiful at all levels. He also pointed out that evolution itself works to the advancement of species, supported by a world that provides all that is necessary to promote life.

  2. (A) Explain Hume's objections to teleological arguments (B) God is the most likely explanation ...

    This is supported by the Epicurean hypothesis. Our world is the fortuitous result of the collision of arrangements of atoms and the evolution of the world and human culture can be explained by "the survival of the fittest" without us having to argue any "natural purpose" or "divine design".

  1. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    Hume's argument (depicted by three characters; Demea, Cleanthes and Philo), preceded The Natural Theology by several decades, but had several major similarities when he undertook the role of Cleanthes: * Both agree that the world works- although Hume uses the analogy of a machine, both Hume and Paley seem to

  2. Key Features of the Teleological Arguement

    This is an argument by analogy, and is convincing to some, but often more convincing to those already inclined to believe in the existence of God A key feature of the teleological argument is order. Hume set out two versions of the design argument.

  1. Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

    He was unconvinced of Darwin's theory of evolution and said that the sciences exclude the supernatural and almost rejects religion as a whole. He thought that in every culture there is a creation story, and in our modern culture, he says that Darwin's theory of evolution is our creation myth.

  2. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    Jesus is not just a man (3) Jesus is not mortal If we posit the opposite conclusion, that Jesus is mortal, are we obliged to reject one of the premises? No, the premises can hold whether the conclusion is true or false.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work