• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The arguments for and against the view that morality is dependant on religion, and to what extent is it more reasonable to argue that morality is independent of religion

Extracts from this document...


The arguments for and against the view that morality is dependant on religion, and to what extent is it more reasonable to argue that morality is independent of religion? Plato once said "Is what pious loved by the Gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved?" What Plato is trying to make us think about here is whether moral actions are good because the Gods command it, or do the Gods command it because the action is good? In doing so Plato presents us with two possibilities. One where there are a set of absolute morals laws and God commands them because the actions are good within themselves. The other where there is only God and humans, no moral laws, and God commands humans to do things; these actions are only good because God commands them to be so. So which commands which? Morality or religion? There are many views to how religion and morality are connected, we can say that morality depends on religion, morality is independent of religion or morality is opposed to religion. ...read more.


Conscience can be seen as a support of religion over morality; most of our moral actions are guided in some way by our conscience or at least allows us to weigh up possible consequences before taking up an action. In many religious texts there are stories of people hearing the voice of God, this may be a reference to the conscience. This shows that morality may be dependant on religion. However in such cultures where things will be seen, on a majority, morally incorrect, like in cultures where acts such as sex with ones cousin or cannibalism are permitted, counter the argument for the conscience being the word of God. As these acts are morally wrong, yet their conscience (whether or not they get guidance from religious texts) says that these immoral deeds are acceptable. If we look at natural moral law again, we can see that it has one large counter argument. Many challenge the idea of humans being designed for a purpose, and how a common, self evident moral law can devise day to day rules. Also, the natural moral law theory falls down if there is no God. ...read more.


So morality isn't totally independent on religion, in our day and age, morality comes more from the nurture of our parents, not the nurture of our religion. Children's books and fables tend to add more to a child's morals than religion. Utilitarianism and situation ethics are another argument against morality being dependant on religion. Utilitarianism, a non religious ethic, is based on doing the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. Not taking into account the minorities utilitarianism can still teach good (and partially flawed) morals. Situation ethics is about doing the most loving act, a mix between situation ethics and utilitarianism calls for a good base of morals. Independent of religion. In conclusion, I don not think morality is dependant on religion. There is a great difference between religion and God, religion does not make us moral, and maybe neither does God. I think morals come from nature and nurture, like some people are "born gay" and how some people turn gay later on. Our morals change and differ, if even only slightly. With each different case, and the more people look into different cases (Such as abortion) their moral standing will change, even if it's only a bit. Morality isn't dependant on religion. Morality comes through nurture and nature. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Religion and Morality

    Aquinas said "among beings there are some more and some less good, true, noble and the like.

  2. religion linked to morality

    of what the consequences may be is selfish, and takes away freedom. An additional argument that supports that religion should not be linked to morality is the evil and despicable actions of so called religious leaders that justify them on account of their religion, for example Osama Bin Laden, the twin towers and his Islam religion.

  1. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    to lose a kidney, for example, if they lead a lifestyle that puts them at more risk of suffering without a kidney, so they must still be used even if they are putting themselves at more risk. It would also mean that there would be another avenue for them to

  2. (a) Examine the reasons why some argue that morality is linked ...

    He is portrayed as being the living exemplar of Kingdom Ethics, his miracles and teachings recorded signs of the Kingdom. Jesus is depicted as proclaiming 'Light' and 'New Life' in contrast to darkness and death; teaching a community ethic built on love, forgiveness and loyalty : 'Love one another, as

  1. Discuss some of the issues raised in Meta-Ethics. How convincing is the view that, ...

    use for it, even if you needed it and it would hurt no one to take it, it is still stealing and, therefore, wrong in itself. Thus, to do 'good', one always must do one's duty. Meta-ethics, then, attempts to go a long way in explaining the essence of 'good'

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    Yet international law dictates that a state cannot pursue actions which may benefit its citizens if these actions infringe upon the sovereignty of another state. There is, of course, the argument that over the ownership of natural resources. Why should natural resources remain exclusively for the benefit of the owner state?

  1. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    They are justified because we approve of them when we turn in them. These moral sentiments and dispositions perfect social nature and hence promote self-interest and human flourishing. Korsgaard thinks that conceiving reflection as having authority over us is the best achievement of this theory. Why should I be moral?

  2. Describe Kant’s theory of duty as the basis for morality.

    Yet, if the shopkeeper did not make any effort, and gave an honest but rude service, he would not make any profit at all. This shows how Kant's theory is not satisfactory for practical purposes, as it is often hard to always act morally right.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work