• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The arguments for and against the view that morality is dependant on religion, and to what extent is it more reasonable to argue that morality is independent of religion

Extracts from this document...


The arguments for and against the view that morality is dependant on religion, and to what extent is it more reasonable to argue that morality is independent of religion? Plato once said "Is what pious loved by the Gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved?" What Plato is trying to make us think about here is whether moral actions are good because the Gods command it, or do the Gods command it because the action is good? In doing so Plato presents us with two possibilities. One where there are a set of absolute morals laws and God commands them because the actions are good within themselves. The other where there is only God and humans, no moral laws, and God commands humans to do things; these actions are only good because God commands them to be so. So which commands which? Morality or religion? There are many views to how religion and morality are connected, we can say that morality depends on religion, morality is independent of religion or morality is opposed to religion. ...read more.


Conscience can be seen as a support of religion over morality; most of our moral actions are guided in some way by our conscience or at least allows us to weigh up possible consequences before taking up an action. In many religious texts there are stories of people hearing the voice of God, this may be a reference to the conscience. This shows that morality may be dependant on religion. However in such cultures where things will be seen, on a majority, morally incorrect, like in cultures where acts such as sex with ones cousin or cannibalism are permitted, counter the argument for the conscience being the word of God. As these acts are morally wrong, yet their conscience (whether or not they get guidance from religious texts) says that these immoral deeds are acceptable. If we look at natural moral law again, we can see that it has one large counter argument. Many challenge the idea of humans being designed for a purpose, and how a common, self evident moral law can devise day to day rules. Also, the natural moral law theory falls down if there is no God. ...read more.


So morality isn't totally independent on religion, in our day and age, morality comes more from the nurture of our parents, not the nurture of our religion. Children's books and fables tend to add more to a child's morals than religion. Utilitarianism and situation ethics are another argument against morality being dependant on religion. Utilitarianism, a non religious ethic, is based on doing the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. Not taking into account the minorities utilitarianism can still teach good (and partially flawed) morals. Situation ethics is about doing the most loving act, a mix between situation ethics and utilitarianism calls for a good base of morals. Independent of religion. In conclusion, I don not think morality is dependant on religion. There is a great difference between religion and God, religion does not make us moral, and maybe neither does God. I think morals come from nature and nurture, like some people are "born gay" and how some people turn gay later on. Our morals change and differ, if even only slightly. With each different case, and the more people look into different cases (Such as abortion) their moral standing will change, even if it's only a bit. Morality isn't dependant on religion. Morality comes through nurture and nature. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Anaylse of the critiques of Religion and Morality.

    In the bible particularly there are some quite conflicting moral principles, with the charge of the deities' instruction, particularly in the Old Testament, being arguably immoral. For instance, in the book of Numbers God commands the Israelites to attack the Midianities, but not only do they attack, at Moses divine

  2. Consider the view that humans have no free will.

    Scientific and philosophical determinism are based in the success of induction and the alleged fixity of the laws of nature; if these apply to the brain also, then determinism seems unavoidable since the laws of causation would suggest that from the first fact of the universe, all other effects must follow inexorably.

  1. Describe Kant’s theory of duty as the basis for morality.

    Another example is if you had to break a promise to a friend to provide evidence for the police, you could not do so, as the action of breaking a promise would be wrong. This critique can be developed further, by suggesting that the police would not necessarily consider the

  2. religion linked to morality

    In addition, being entirely autonomous allows atheists to make moral decisions in new situations that religious rules cannot give answers to or conflict on in the 21st century. Furthermore, being autonomous allows people to use their free will in moral decision making as obedience to religious rules out of fear

  1. Religion and Morality

    Aquinas said "among beings there are some more and some less good, true, noble and the like.

  2. Explain Aquinass cosmological argument

    The weaknesses of the cosmological argument outweigh its strengths. To what extent do you agree with this view? The cosmological is based on logic and applies a posterior knowledge of the world around us to suggest God's existence. To a person that believes in God, his argument is extremely convincing as it "proves" that God is a necessary being,

  1. Discuss critically the belief that conscience is the voice of God.

    from wrong, the development, non-development or perversion of that sense is largely a question of upbringing, education and propaganda. An example of upbringing is if an adult was brought up as child by extremely strict vegetarian parents, now older, attempts to eat meat he will in all probability suffer an extremely bad attack of "conscience."

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    For example, when Erich Fromm says that "love is the only sane and satisfactory answet to the problem of human existence," he speaks and describes love exactly as a Christian would-except that he does not bring God into it. He thinks Christianly but talks humanistically.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work