• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Body/Soul split is a myth created by philosophers such as Plato.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Body/Soul split is a myth created by philosophers such as Plato. The belief in life after death or of an immortal soul is not a new occurrence. Philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle and Hick have made attempts at explaining their views on the soul, as well as people like Dawkins, who argue that there is no such thing as the soul at all. Plato was what is known as a dualist. He believed that the body and the soul were separate things, that the soul animates the body and that the body is mortal, whereas the soul is immortal, and so survives death. Upon the bodies death, Plato believe the soul would be released from it's "prison" and allowed to look upon the forms. ...read more.

Middle

By this he means that there are different aspects to a person's soul, but it is still in one part. He used a diamond to illustrate his point, as there are many faces on a diamond, but it cannot be split. The different faces, or aspects of the soul are similar to Freud's division of the mind. The aspects are Reason, which searches for the truth and rules the soul; Spirit, this includes a number of aspects which can be trained, such as aggressiveness, being honourable and your emotions and Desire or Mercenary. This is linked with the idea of hedonism and seeking pleasures for the self, he split the desires up further into those that are necessary, those that are unnecessary and perverted desires. ...read more.

Conclusion

The argument from opposites is that we can see everything in the physical world consists of opposites and that the opposite of living was death. For death to be a "thing" he said there must exist a soul to make something "alive" Plato's views on the soul are very much dependant on his theory of the forms and so the same weaknesses apply to both. Arguments such as how can one "see" the forms when seeing is a process linked with a body, how can a disembodied soul "see" anything? Some people see learning as acquiring new knowledge and so not an act of remembering. The argument of opposites can be disputed as the idea that everything has an opposite can be challenged. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Comparison of Plato and Aristotle's views of how knowledge is obtained and the body ...

    These are the four causes. The first is 'the material cause', this answers the question, what is it made of? But material alone is not enough to make an object, e.g. the paints used to make a painting. The second cause is 'the efficient cause'; this is the agent which creates something about e.g.

  2. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    Many, and a human problem; he had to battle against the sophists. Sophists were professional philosophers who lived in Athens at the time of Plato. They were sceptics, who believed that there was no such thing as certain knowledge. Plato spoke out against them.

  1. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    However there are a number of explanations for the phenomenon including hoaxes or elaborate tricks, which could convince people they had seen a ghost whereas in actuality they had not. Secondly there is the 'stone tape' theory which suggests that just as a magnetic tape is able to record events

  2. Body soul destinction

    The mind according to Descartes is non - spatial and is distinct from material and bodily substances. He suggested that everything has characteristics and that the mind and body's characteristics are different therefore hey must be separate. For example a property of the mind may be consciousness, whereas the body has more aesthetic qualities such as height breadth etc.

  1. Plato & The Soul

    However this provides one of the most serious and potentially defeating criticisms of Plato's views on the soul. He fails to address the issue of the interrelationship between body and soul, if they are indeed distinct. Does the soul act as controller of a lifeless body, or is there more to the body than simply the material.

  2. Why does the mind and body problem still exist?

    Someone who challenges epiphenomenalism is David Chalmers. Another theory is known as Materialism which is that everything is either made only of matter or is ultimately dependant upon matter for its existence and nature. One of the first materialists to emerge was Aristotle, later on Thomas Hobbes and Pierre Gassendi represent the materialists tradition in opposition to Rene Descartes.

  1. The World of the forms is a myth made up by Plato. Discuss.

    He came to this conclusion when he made his slave boy do a maths problem of which he solves, so Crito believed that this showed that even without being taught the boy some how already new, probably through recollection of previously knowing.

  2. The body soul distinction is a myth derived from philosophers such as plato discuss.

    the body and experience through one's senses, however Hindus and Plato would say that it is possible to see the world of the forms with the Third Eye, the third eye belief stems from Hindu beliefs that we each have a inner eye in between our brows, for Hindus this

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work