• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Body/Soul split is a myth created by philosophers such as Plato.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Body/Soul split is a myth created by philosophers such as Plato. The belief in life after death or of an immortal soul is not a new occurrence. Philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle and Hick have made attempts at explaining their views on the soul, as well as people like Dawkins, who argue that there is no such thing as the soul at all. Plato was what is known as a dualist. He believed that the body and the soul were separate things, that the soul animates the body and that the body is mortal, whereas the soul is immortal, and so survives death. Upon the bodies death, Plato believe the soul would be released from it's "prison" and allowed to look upon the forms. ...read more.

Middle

By this he means that there are different aspects to a person's soul, but it is still in one part. He used a diamond to illustrate his point, as there are many faces on a diamond, but it cannot be split. The different faces, or aspects of the soul are similar to Freud's division of the mind. The aspects are Reason, which searches for the truth and rules the soul; Spirit, this includes a number of aspects which can be trained, such as aggressiveness, being honourable and your emotions and Desire or Mercenary. This is linked with the idea of hedonism and seeking pleasures for the self, he split the desires up further into those that are necessary, those that are unnecessary and perverted desires. ...read more.

Conclusion

The argument from opposites is that we can see everything in the physical world consists of opposites and that the opposite of living was death. For death to be a "thing" he said there must exist a soul to make something "alive" Plato's views on the soul are very much dependant on his theory of the forms and so the same weaknesses apply to both. Arguments such as how can one "see" the forms when seeing is a process linked with a body, how can a disembodied soul "see" anything? Some people see learning as acquiring new knowledge and so not an act of remembering. The argument of opposites can be disputed as the idea that everything has an opposite can be challenged. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain Plato's and Aristotle's ideas of form, body, knowledge and soul.

    Plato made two contributions to the theory of knowledge. One was that knowledge is recollecting what is in your head already, not perceiving new things. The other was his theory of forms. Plato faced two major problems when he came to consider what true knowledge is. A philosophical problem; he has to reconcile the problem of One and the

  2. Comparison of Plato and Aristotle's views of how knowledge is obtained and the body ...

    These are the four causes. The first is 'the material cause', this answers the question, what is it made of? But material alone is not enough to make an object, e.g. the paints used to make a painting. The second cause is 'the efficient cause'; this is the agent which creates something about e.g.

  1. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    They may appear to be solid, but the truth is that they are in reality just an impulse of energy. When an individual dies, the energy field may retain his/her image and may be perceived as a 'ghost'. He considered the ghost to be an individual's consciousness manifesting itself through the remaining energy.

  2. Body soul destinction

    On the other hand Dawkins, a biological materialist would disagree with the opinion that the soul and the body are separate substances. Dawkins bases his theory on evolution and genetics. He would reject any concept of an eternal soul and therefore rejects dualism.

  1. The World of the forms is a myth made up by Plato. Discuss.

    Therefore this shows is some evidence for Plato's design argument. Aristotle put forward a criticism of the theory of Forms he said that what if there is a man who is a copy of the Form of the man.

  2. The body soul distinction is a myth derived from philosophers such as plato discuss.

    the body and experience through one's senses, however Hindus and Plato would say that it is possible to see the world of the forms with the Third Eye, the third eye belief stems from Hindu beliefs that we each have a inner eye in between our brows, for Hindus this

  1. Plato & The Soul

    Plato believed that the soul, if it were to be the animator of all living things, must be responsible for a person's mental or psychological activities and responses. For the soul cannot be the reason for life, yet at the same time limited in its influence over the bodies in which it animates.

  2. Evaluate plato and aristotle on well being

    "when the whole mind accepts the leadership of the philosophical part, and there is no internal conflict, then each part can do its job and be moral in everything it does, and in particular it can enjoy its own pleasures and thus reaps as much benefit from pleasure as is possible" (586)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work