• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The concept of authority simply masks the possession of power. Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

7/5/15 The concept of authority simply masks the possession of power. Discuss (30 marks) By authority we are referring to that which is held by states, Descriptive Practical Authority (DPA) and, is applicable, Normative Practical Authority (NPA). Power is simply the means by which all of us are able to do anything ? from picking up a pen in order to write, to becoming Prime Minister in order to govern and to persuasion in order to gain influence. This question is fundamentally flawed for it implies that the possession of power is somehow separate from the possession of authority. As we shall see in this essay, power is something all of us need and crave, and authority is there to provide legitimacy to only the ?correct? sort of power. ...read more.

Middle

A state then, has authority, and thus legitimacy, if it can maintain public order ? DPA, a defacto judgement, gives NPA: North Korea in this light be said to be rightful or legitimate in holding its power. Other philosophers, such as John Locke, do not believe that the ?State of Nature? would be as bad as Hobbes made out. He instead thinks that because we have Natural Rights, inalienable and discoverable by all rational beings ? bestowed from God ? the ?State of Nature? would not be a ?state of licence.? Be that as it may, he presented the argument that only a state could protect these Natural Rights of ?life, liberty and property? effectively. ...read more.

Conclusion

If we take the view of Marx Stirner, an individualist anarchist, one can only have authority over one?s own power ? in other words ? one makes one?s own choices according to ones ethics and conscience. Only they, the individual, can give legitimacy to their actions: each person is at the centre of their own moral universe. Overall, as we have seen, to not talk of authority when it comes to human and/or state action is impossible. Authority does not masks power, but gives it legitimacy: whether this legitimacy applies to a state or person differs from thinker to thinker. One thing we cannot do, however, is talk of power without legitimacy or authority ? remember, ?life simply is the will to power.? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    However, if either of their desired leaders were to 'seize power' (either by force or just accidentally falling into power), there would be definite issues with people who didn't believe their justification. In this case, their authority could be considered illegitimate.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    The slave is led by a superior guide, and wants to be, because it is comforting. So hence, Nietzsche sees the Enlightenment or 'age of reason' as 'enraging to the slave' because it removes an 'Absolute Truth' I.e. God. So forth, the slaves have to find their own truths.

  1. 'It pays to be moral.' Discuss. (30)

    There is also the social contract theory, which argues that it pays to be moral - however it is first important to know that before the social contract was put in place we was living in what is known as the state of nature, which is the term used to describe the (hypothetical)

  2. Discuss critically the differing notions of power and freedom explored in the 'Gorgias'.

    Wielding power is not good in its own right, there also needs to be some benefit coupled with the power. Plato uses the idea that rhetoricians are not intelligent in their own right to comment that if power is the ability to get what you want then a rhetorician, without any intelligence nor rational expertise lacks power.

  1. Synoptic Study, Satre, Engels and Marx

    need to greatly expand the point of Inter subjectivity shall do more reading on the subject). Some might look at this account of freedom and say that it seems to idealistic to be taken too seriously. How can Sartre say that I have absolute when there are so many things I am not free to do?

  2. Philosophy - Conscience (90/90)

    They are simply metaphors for the conscience's divine authority on a bodily and societal level. This is further supported by Plato's 'Allegory of the Chariot'; the charioteer representing Intellect/Reason/Conscience, the white horse signifying the aforementioned morals and affections, and the black horse symbolising appetites.

  1. What is authority?

    Reply: One type of power/authority has been lost (the ability to get people to do things by command, persuasion, threat, etc), but another type has not been lost (the ability to get people to do things by force). This is just a distinction between different means by which someone can exercise authority.

  2. The Concept of Life After Death is Incoherent - Discuss.

    Sheol became a waiting place (similar to purgatory), the evil suffered an eternity in Gehenna while the righteous would enter Paradise. To what extent is the concept of life after death incoherent? The first problem that we encounter when discussing any form of life after death is the idea of a disembodied existence, an existence outside of our physical bodies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work