• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The concept of authority simply masks the possession of power. Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

7/5/15 The concept of authority simply masks the possession of power. Discuss (30 marks) By authority we are referring to that which is held by states, Descriptive Practical Authority (DPA) and, is applicable, Normative Practical Authority (NPA). Power is simply the means by which all of us are able to do anything ? from picking up a pen in order to write, to becoming Prime Minister in order to govern and to persuasion in order to gain influence. This question is fundamentally flawed for it implies that the possession of power is somehow separate from the possession of authority. As we shall see in this essay, power is something all of us need and crave, and authority is there to provide legitimacy to only the ?correct? sort of power. ...read more.

Middle

A state then, has authority, and thus legitimacy, if it can maintain public order ? DPA, a defacto judgement, gives NPA: North Korea in this light be said to be rightful or legitimate in holding its power. Other philosophers, such as John Locke, do not believe that the ?State of Nature? would be as bad as Hobbes made out. He instead thinks that because we have Natural Rights, inalienable and discoverable by all rational beings ? bestowed from God ? the ?State of Nature? would not be a ?state of licence.? Be that as it may, he presented the argument that only a state could protect these Natural Rights of ?life, liberty and property? effectively. ...read more.

Conclusion

If we take the view of Marx Stirner, an individualist anarchist, one can only have authority over one?s own power ? in other words ? one makes one?s own choices according to ones ethics and conscience. Only they, the individual, can give legitimacy to their actions: each person is at the centre of their own moral universe. Overall, as we have seen, to not talk of authority when it comes to human and/or state action is impossible. Authority does not masks power, but gives it legitimacy: whether this legitimacy applies to a state or person differs from thinker to thinker. One thing we cannot do, however, is talk of power without legitimacy or authority ? remember, ?life simply is the will to power.? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    However, if either of their desired leaders were to 'seize power' (either by force or just accidentally falling into power), there would be definite issues with people who didn't believe their justification. In this case, their authority could be considered illegitimate.

  2. Discuss critically the differing notions of power and freedom explored in the 'Gorgias'.

    Polus continues to claim that political speakers have power, to which Socrates paradoxically replies that they "have the least power of any in the state". In order to back this up Socrates claims that, although you may be able to do what is best, it is not necessarily true that you can do what you actually want.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    are my own, not by causes which affect me, as it were, from outside." By participating in your government and thinking for yourself you can achieve self mastery. By having political self-mastery you are free to form a society which forms your values, which leads to democracy.

  2. 'It pays to be moral.' Discuss. (30)

    As an example, if I desired welfare from helping others, unless I desired for its own sake that others do well, I would not derive welfare from helping them. Welfare results from my action but cannot be the only aim.

  1. Philosophy - Conscience (90/90)

    They are simply metaphors for the conscience's divine authority on a bodily and societal level. This is further supported by Plato's 'Allegory of the Chariot'; the charioteer representing Intellect/Reason/Conscience, the white horse signifying the aforementioned morals and affections, and the black horse symbolising appetites.

  2. Synoptic Study, Satre, Engels and Marx

    Abraham Abandonment - Pupil asking for advice, Jesuit priest. Despair and quietims - Friend at the station, death, Proust and woman in the restaurant. Sartre's account leaves us in the difficult position of not caring and being cut of from other people. In Sartre's early play "No Exit" he seems to be in this position as the character Gar�in famously states that "Hell is other people".

  1. The Concept of Life After Death is Incoherent - Discuss.

    direct sense experience is on a miniscule scale and is impossible to prove. This would mean that logical positivists would argue that the statement that life after death is coherent is completely meaningless. With the obvious problem of the verification principle (the doctrine that arguments or statements are meaningful only

  2. Philosophy - analysis of Nietzsche, Sartre and Tolstoy

    Explain why you do, or don't, find his reaction justified? Tolstoy 1. Assumed there was a simple answer to the question: what is the meaning of life? 2. Plagued by questions relating to 'the point' of most of his actions and accomplishments.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work