• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The controversy that is evolution. I shall start with the argument against evolution.

Extracts from this document...


Assignment - controversy that is evolution I will be looking at the controversy that is evolution. The one side being we have evolved from primate to Neanderthal man to homo sapien. And the other from a religious creator point of view and the view of no proof of evolution. I shall start with the argument against evolution. The issue here is that faith is something which can not be proven that's why it's called faith because you have to believe, compared to that which has not been proven (theory) (1). This articles argument is that until there is specific evidence and proof in some form of fossil or gradual progression and transition from one species to the next, evolution will remain an unproven, yet appealing, theory. Creationism in the Oxford English Dictionary (6) means 'the belief that the universe and living creatures were created by God in accordance with the account given in the Old Testament.' Creationists will try and argue the case in favour of their belief when people comment on how the Earth is far older than 6000 years and therefore how could God have made it. ...read more.


However questions may be asked from the opposing side about the religious background to the creationism argument. The point being if your not religious your not going to believe in the creation story and therefore not going to believe God created everything - so they will look for answers in nature and elsewhere and create theories to try and prove where we did come from. In these evolution scientist minds we did evolve from apes, and they will try and prove the creation story wrong and their theory right. I shall now go on to look at the arguments for the theory of evolution. Evolution in the oxford English dictionary (6) means 'the process by which different kinds of living organism are believed to have developed, especially by natural selection ; gradual development.' Humans and chimpanzees share some 99% of DNA and amino acid identity (8, page 721). These figures are good numbers to look at and to try and prove we have evolved from chimps, and are convincing. However despite this high percent our morphological, biomedical and cognitive differences are significant. This is why creationists and other people find it hard to believe we have morphed from chimps into humans. ...read more.


More a change due to environmental conditions and better living standards - which wouldn't explain the change from ape to human. Monkeys can be trained to walk bipedally rather than quadrupidally (11, page 739). This meaning we could have evolved to better suit ourselves, a kind of survival of the fittest. The bipedal walking after 2-3km per day, changes there skeletal system and existence of humanlike lumbar lordosis shows (7, page 740). The benefits of this bipedal walking means they expend less energy and can walk with longer less frequent sides - so therefore have adapted to benefit themselves. The arguments here for evolution theory aren't as strong as those for the creationist theory purely because of the facts that they are theories and haven't been proven yet. One theorist says one thing and then another theorist says another, always contradicting each other. Until facts are made clearer and proof found the theory of evolution will go on. All the articles I have read have been convincing to there point of view, some more so than others. Some even seem to debate and out different ideas across in their own argument. The best arguments were those with the facts and figures and scientific drawings. Points which are reliable and not biased which are factual and true. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christianity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Christianity essays

  1. Discuss whether the ontological argument would convince an atheist

    A final criticism of the ontological argument which many believe finally demolished such arguments as a tool to convince atheists is from Kant. Kant argued that 'existence is not a predicate' as it does not tell us anything about the object that would help to identify it in away.

  2. Outline the cosmological argument for the existance of God. and plan.

    There are also some roots of the cosmological arguments in Greek philosophy, and Plato's idea that for a cause to accept motion from another cause then there must be a pre existing 'first cause' to start the motion off. Leibniz supported the cosmological argument by saying that the possibility of

  1. Outline the cosmological argument for the existence of God.

    Firstly, it is important to establish a definition of God. According to philosophers God is an infinitely perfect being that upholds a divine unity of ultimate goodness and of ultimate power. God is referred to as Omniscient, Omnipotent and Eternal.


    extent that we deliberate over what Paul is attempting to put across through it, however what it clear by its inclusion it Paul's treatment towards the subject reflecting the attention it ought to draw. However we can see with clarity that Paul sees the gospel his preaches as not the

  1. Examine the main ideas and strengths of the design argument for the existence of ...

    is a reasonable interpretation and a cumulative force of a different design argument. It's hard to determine which is a better theory though. In support of Hume's idea, that the universe came about by chance, comes an argument from Richard Dawkins who is also an atheist.

  2. Assess the ontological argument

    He defined a predicate as something which adds a descriptive property to the subject, which the word "exists" does not. For example, if one imagines "100 gold coins" and then "100 gold coins that exist", the image is exactly the same.

  1. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, a

    This means that like salt we should purify, preserve and flavour other people's lives. We should also be like light in that we are visible-Christianity is something that should be seen- we should be a guide like a light and also a warning.

  2. The Ideas of Hell and Purgatory: A Wide Shift from Then to Now.

    Prior to July of 1999, the Catholic Church claimed that hell is a place where people who have died and not been wiped clean by church rituals will be severely punished for eternity. The level of punishment depends on the sin committed, and there is no hope of relief.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work