• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Cosmological Argument

Extracts from this document...


The Cosmological Argument The Cosmological Argument attempts to prove that God exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to things that exist. It states that there must be a final uncaused-cause of all things. This uncaused-cause is asserted to be God. Arguments like this are thought up to recognize why we and the universe exist. The Cosmological Argument takes several forms but is basically represented below. Cosmological Argument Things exist It is possible for those things not to exist Whatever has the possibility of non-existence, yet exists, has been caused to exist. Something cannot bring itself into existence because it would have had to exist to do that. There cannot be an infinite number of causes to bring something into existence, because an infinite regression of causes has no original cause, which means there is no cause of existence. Since the universe exists, it must have a cause, therefore there must be an uncaused cause of all things. ...read more.


The only adequate explanation, the arguments suggest, is that God created it. What distinguishes the kalam cosmological argument from other forms of cosmological argument is that it rests on the idea that the universe has a beginning in time. Modal forms of the cosmological argument are consistent with the universe having an infinite past. With the kalam cosmological argument, however, it is precisely because the universe is thought to have a beginning in time that the existence of the universe is thought to stand in need of explanation. The argument has the following structure: (1) Everything that has a beginning of its existence has a cause of its existence. (2) The universe has a beginning of its existence. Therefore: (3) The universe has a cause of its existence. (4) If the universe has a cause of its existence then that cause is God. Therefore: (5) God exists. The key idea of the kalam cosmological argument is "The universe has a beginning of its existence". ...read more.


It is this that the argument from contingency takes to be significant. It is because it is thought that the universe exists contingently that its existence is thought to require explanation. If the universe might not have existed, then why does it exist? Supporters of the cosmological argument suggest that questions like this always have answers. The existence of things that are necessary does not require explanation; their non-existence is impossible. The existence of anything contingent, however, does require explanation. They might not have existed, and so there must be some reason that they do exist. The only adequate explanation of the existence of the contingent universe, the argument from contingency suggests, is that there exists a necessary being on which its existence it rests. For the existence of the contingent universe must rest on something, and if it rested on some contingent being then that contingent being too would require some explanation of its existence. The ultimate explanation of the existence of all things, therefore, must be the existence of some necessary being. Followers of the cosmological argument identify God as this necessary being. Isobel Manley ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The Cosmological Argument

    it could be argued, we have some idea of where are going? Theists could obviously claim that if life begins with God then life has a purpose with God. However, atheists could argue that if life began from a series of natural causes then the purpose to life must be found in biology.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Not everything is contingent (something is necessary). 7) Every necessary thing gets its necessity either from itself or from something else. 8) There can't be an infinite chain of necessary things giving necessity to other necessary things. 9) There must be a necessary thing which gets its necessity from

  1. Explain the cosmological argument for existence of God

    However, scientists have proven that sub-atomic particles can come into existence without a cause. Scientists today do not believe that it is a law that everything must have a cause, especially at the subatomic level in modern physics. This is damaging to Aquinas' argument because one of the conditions is

  2. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    He said that should we be able to explain the causes of, say, each particle out of a group of twenty, it would be unreasonable to go on to ask what the cause of the whole twenty would be. If we have explained each part of a series, have we not explained the whole?

  1. What are the key ideas of the cosmological argument?

    Because the universe is complex, there must be some ultimate being creating it, it cannot simply 'be', This fits is with Swinbourne's principle that the world is dependent on a superior being- god. The Cosmological Argument gives a reason how this complex universe was created, how and why god exists.

  2. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of - The Thomist Cosmological Argument of the Existence ...

    The cause of the universe must therefore be external to it and have always existed. This non-contingent being must be God. This is an A Posteriori argument, which can be defined as one in which the truth may only be true after empirical evidence has been used to prove it.

  1. Explain the Key features of the cosmological argument

    Put differently it means everything that happens has a cause. The cause itself has a cause. Something cannot cause itself for this would mean it proceeded itself and this is impossible i.e. there needs to be an uncaused object, suggesting the idea of God, to create the cause.

  2. The Cosmological Argument

    He believed the prime mover must be non- spatial and eternal, its presence must activate the world and it must be good and perfect. He also believed all things are encouraged towards a good and ultimate goal. Aquinas extended this view in his first way from motion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work