• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The debate about religious language starts with the question of whether God can be spoken of meaningfully or not.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐The debate about religious language starts with the question of whether God can be spoken of meaningfully or not. Some philosophers, such as the Logical Positivists, have concluded that no talk of religion is meaningful (either because religious statements cannot be verified or because religious belief can never be falsified and therefore asserts no claims.) However, other philosophers, such as Wittgenstein have concluded that religious language is meaningful. Having come to this conclusion, one meets several hypotheses claiming to present the most successful human understanding of an ineffable God. Analogy is one such theory. Aquinas put forward the theory of analogy because he did not feel that God could be adequately expressed in normal human language. This is because our language is either univocal (we use one word that has the same meaning in all situations, for example ?wise? means full of wisdom ? this is the only meaning of the word) or equivocal ( some of our language has more than one meaning. ?Bat? could refer to a small animal or a piece of sports equipment.) Aquinas suggested that univocal language was not appropriate to use about God because God is unlike any human concept ? if we used ?good? univocally about Helen and God we would be suggesting that Helen?s goodness was the same as God?s! ...read more.


This is the analogy of attribution. Secondly, Aquinas proposes the analogy of proportion. This states that everything has qualities in proportion to their nature. To say that I am good at the piano is in proportion to the fact that I practise for two hours a day. Mozart was also good at piano playing but this does not imply that we both play to the same standard! ?Good? is used in proportion to the fact that he is a professional. We can also explain this in terms of purpose. Everything has a purpose, and the potentiality to fulfil it. God has no potentiality, only actuality ? so God?s goodness is in proportion to what it means to be God, as my goodness is in proportion to what it means to be me, and Mozart?s is in proportion to what it means to be Mozart. Since God has no potentiality though, whilst I could be ?more good? God cannot: whatever it means to be God, He fulfils it completely. Aquinas? concept of God as wholly simple. So Aquinas concludes that God?s attributes are proportional to what it means to be God and that he perfectly fulfils this role. His attributes are not magnified versions of human concepts. ...read more.


We can see then that perhaps theories of God?s nature that are perhaps weak when used alone are in fact much stronger when used together. Symbol helps us reach a truly human understanding of God by using human terms symbolically to glimpse the nature of the transcendent and ineffable. These human terms must be qualified however and it is here that analogy can be useful ? the analogy of attribution would inform us that God?s care is not just a magnified version of my father?s care and the analogy of proportion would help us to understand that God?s care is proportionate to what it means to be God (and that God fulfils whatever that may be perfectly). In this way, we have countered Scotus? claim. At the final turn we might also consider that, since God is ineffable, we can never truly describe Him: this is part of the human understanding of God and so, whatever we find out with symbol and analogy, we must also qualify with the knowledge that God is not exactly so. This is the Via Negativa. In the end , we can see that analogy, which is a good foundation, but a little vague, can be used successfully to express a human understanding of God, but that this is best achieved in combination with other theories of religious language such as symbol and the Via Negativa. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Discuss critically the use of symbol as a means of expressing ideas about God

    and Randall takes a similar stance and they both seem to conclude that religious statements are false and not meaningful. Tillich adopted views both of a realist and anti-realist and believed God was separate from the finite world and was beyond existence.

  2. `I know God exists, because I have an idea of perfection Discuss whether knowledge ...

    Hume would argue that it is possible to define simple ideas. Locke claimed that simple ideas are typically coherent and vivid, whilst complex ideas are not. Despite this, rationalists may well claim that it must be surely possible to have a complex idea which possesses the characteristics of a simple idea.

  1. Explain the Copplestone-Russell Radio Debate

    This explanation leads to a being which exists, but which contains within itself the cause of its existence. It existence is "Self-explanatory". He is "De Re necessary" meaning that he is only dependent on itself and necessary in and of itself.

  2. The Goodness of God

    In the ancient times and Jews today this is seen as an example of God's goodness because it means rest from hard work once a week. "Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy." (Exodus 20:8) This is good as it is an example of God being morally good in instructing humans to do what is best for them.

  1. "Religious Language is meaningless." Discuss.

    For example, the story of the End of the World, Bultmann would have said that that represented individual human life coming to an end. However, mythological language is so deeply engrained in theological discussion that many philosophers believe that it may be impossible to dispense with it.

  2. Examine the contributions that two of the following may make to a study of ...

    J.H Randall believed that symbols serve purpose and important functions these being a motivational one he says that it fires up our passions and emotions, also a social function he states that people have a common social understanding of symbols this then strengthens their social bonds.

  1. Philosophers have proved conclusively that religious language is meaningful. Discuss

    the statement ?the moon is made of green cheese? is obviously false, it would be meaningful to the logical positivists as it is known how to prove the statement false, that is by actually going to the moon and taking samples of the rock.

  2. Evaluate the claim that analogy can successfully be used to express the human understanding ...

    Analogy is then split up into two different types by Aquinas, the first being analogy of attribution when there is a casual relationship in what is being described, for example when we speak of god as living it means that god is the cause of life.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work