• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Design Argument for the Existence of God

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Design Argument for the Existence of God 1) Outline the Design Argument for the existence of God The Design Argument for the existence of God also called the teleological argument makes the basic assumption that there is order and design in our universe, which everything fits together and all things function to fulfil a specific purpose. The key idea associated with design arguments are that God's existence can be argued for, by the way things in the world are structured, or that the world cannot have come to be the way it is through the course of chance, but by a great designer - God (the God of classical theism.) The Design argument is concerned with showing that God is the Creator of the world; the basic argument for design is: The universe has order, purpose and regularity The complexity of the universe shows evidence of design Such design implies a designer The designer of the universe is God. It is argued that such design cannot come about by chance and can only be explained with reference to an intelligent, great designer. It is possible to demonstrate this by drawing an analogy between the works of human design and the works of nature, concluding that there are sufficient similarities to infer design of a similar nature. ...read more.

Middle

His analogy is between a watch and the world, his argument was design qua purpose. If we were to come across a watch, we would be able to conclude that it shows all the marks of contrivance and design. We would take the accurate assumption that it was not made through chance, but designed by a watchmaker. In this same way we can look at the world and our universe, that it has been designed, by a great designer - God. Therefore this is a clear outline of the design of the world being proof of God. Vardy wrote in his book (The puzzle of God) about Paley's argument that we should notice from this analogy that we do not need to know the purpose of the watch or the universe in order to infer a designer, simply that the design implies a designer. This analogy is a definite strength of the argument; it offers clarity and makes its point by relating the world to something more manageable to imagine which we can relate to. Paley is not the only philosopher who has used an analogy to describe their viewpoint. Aquinas and Hume have also used effective analogies clarifying their argument. The teleological argument is an a posteriori argument. This means that the design argument can only be known to be true or false by reference to experience, to how things actually are in the world. ...read more.

Conclusion

There must be more than physical laws to account for the tremendously high improbability of life. This point is one of A.E.Taylor's points. F.R.Tennant in his writings 'Philosophical Theology' agrees with the anthropic principle stating that the cosmos is constructed for the development of human life and this could not have happened by chance. This agrees with Dysons argument. Tennant also postulates the aesthetic principle. This is the principle that states that the universe is more that simply orderly; it possesses a natural beauty beyond that which is necessary to live. Beauty is held to have no survival value nor has human appreciation of beauty any apparent real value in helping humans to live together or to be more effectively in the environment within which they find themselves. Naturally there is a survival value in females and males finding each other attractive, cut what is the survival advantage of seeing the beauty in a snowflake. These two thought provoking questions are raised by Vardy. The ability to appreciate beauty, therefore, may be held to be an indication that there is a God. Clearly this is another strength of the teleological argument the anthropic principle and the aesthetic principle both bring up questions that science cannot answer, making the point of God being the designer of the universe. This aesthetic argument shows how beauty goes beyond what is needed for human survival; it gives pleasure and reflects God's glory. ?? ?? ?? ?? Lulu Wimbush 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the design argument for the existence of God.

    4 star(s)

    If Hume were alive today, he would argue with Dawkins, he might suggest that 'brute fact' is one possible explanation for the existence of the universe but so are other possibilities, Hume suggested in his criticisms of design arguments that we can only see one side of the scales and not the other side.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The design argument is also known as the teleological argument. The argument looks at ...

    3 star(s)

    Astronomical discoveries and Issac Newton's laws of motion, demonstrate a controlled, rather than random, principle at work in the universe. In particular, Paley considered the motion of the planets in the solar system. He argued that the relationships between them and the effect of gravity on them could not have come about without a designing principle at work.

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    God's existence is a necessary presupposition of there being any moral judgements that are objective, that go beyond mere relativistic moral preferences; such judgements require standards external to any human mind-that is, they presume God's mind.51 Although, a person may know that God is omnipresent but that does not mean they fully understand his being.

  2. Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

    He was unconvinced of Darwin's theory of evolution and said that the sciences exclude the supernatural and almost rejects religion as a whole. He thought that in every culture there is a creation story, and in our modern culture, he says that Darwin's theory of evolution is our creation myth.

  1. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    The concept that God allowed man to sculpt and protect the world also raises the issue that God must've created man to have free will, to be able to make decisions and therefore create and develop the world as man sees fit.

  2. What are they key features of the design argument for the existence of God?

    F.R Tennant put this argument forward, arguing that there is no particular reason to expect a beautiful as opposed to an ugly world and that the presence of beauty and the human ability to appreciate it could be seen as signs that God wishes to draw us towards the divine.

  1. summary of the design argument

    Yet plants and animals are non-rational beings, something or someone must be directing them to their goal. To summarise, Aquinas demonstrates how the design argument is strong because, there is clear undoubted, beneficial order in the world which could not be by chance or intelligence of that being, the being must by directed by something of intelligence.

  2. Examine the key ideas and strengths of the design argument for the existence of ...

    Which is unique. Hume looks at the complexity of a ship and notes the construction and how many people must have been employed to make the ship.in the same way he suggests how many gods or intelligent designers there were to make the universe or universes, as we don?t know.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work