• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The design argument is challenged far more by science than by philosophy." Discuss with specific reference to the work of Darwin and Hume.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

R.S Essay "The design argument is challenged far more by science than by philosophy." Discuss with specific reference to the work of Darwin and Hume. For many years, theologians, philosophers and scientists have been desperately trying to give evidence and prove whether or not the existence of God is accurate. Plato gave the first full articulation, in combination, of the various elements in the design argument. The synthesis was distinctly his, and the argument he offered follows directly from central themes within his own philosophical position. Ever since that moment people in the world have been developing the idea and trying every year to extract new information on the subject which will solve the mystery. According to Hume, there could never be sufficiently strong evidence to establish the existence of something that is contrary to the laws of nature. However, is Hume right? Many people think Hume, nearly three-quarters of a century before Darwin theory on 'Evolution', buried the design argument in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. And it is true that he offers remarkably ingenious criticism of the argument. But there are three problems that have gotten less attention than they deserve. The first is that some of his criticisms are of the design argument as support for the traditional God, loaded down with "omni-" attributes. ...read more.

Middle

Why is there so much beauty in the world? On the other side you ask yourself the question why is there so much evil as well. All in all the good and evil probably balance each other out. The fact remains that there are scientific problems with Darwinism that are quite independent of what anybody thinks of in the Bible. In addition, the doctrine of Darwinism can be shown to be a philosophical assumption not proved by scientific observation. Intelligent design includes a belief in God, Darwinism includes a belief in materialism. Both are "religious" or philosophical worldviews. Materialism did not found modern science, Theism (the belief in God) did (Pascal, Newton, Farraday, etc) There is a difference between origin science (a type of forensic science which looks into evidence for past events) and operation science (which is observation of current events). Hume was correct in that people do demand more evidence to back up claims to have witness an extraordinary event than for an ordinary one. According to Hume, there could never be sufficiently strong evidence to establish the existence of something that is contrary to the laws of nature. But, is he right? To use Hume's words 'lead cannot, of itself, remain suspended in the air' because we have repeated observed that it falls to the ground when we drop it. ...read more.

Conclusion

Or perhaps the world was perfect at the start like the Garden of Eden but has fallen from the grace of His initial design. Hume criticises the conclusion to the argument being God of Christianity or Islam but why shouldn't there be a team of Gods? However, on the other hand, the idea of one God having made the whole world is integral to the Bible and Christian tradition whereas the idea of a team of Gods has no philosophical framework or support. The Anthropic principle (the fact that the universe has been set up to produce us) seems to support the Design argument as well. You could say that the Design Argument is philosophically flawed as a proof but is still very good as a probability argument (Tennant). Hume shows that the argument isn't proof. It was never going to convince an atheist for the existence of God but, as part of all the cumulative evidence, it makes God's existence a lot more probable. In conclusion, which is actually the bigger challenge science or philosophy? Darwin can't explain the goal of evolution so he doesn't get rid of the idea of the designer. So, in effect Darwin's theory can work in tandem with the Design argument. On the other hand, some say that Hume destroys the Design argument whereas others say that it is just there as evidence for people who already believe. However, should you need proof? All in all, science provides evidence against the argument whereas philosophy only provides ideas and arguments. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Critically assess the design argument

    The argument from design is arguably very persuasive, it clearly demonstrates the way everything appears to be adapted for a specific function and shows how this consequently suggests the possibility of design.

  2. What are the key ideas of the design argument?

    Hume questions whether similar effects implies similar causes, for example two people with the same name are not likely to be from the same parents. The design argument says that similar effects do imply similar causes, e.g.

  1. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    In addition, it is possible that there is a rational explanation for this apparent 'recall'. Firstly, the individual might simply be recalling information gained in childhood and attributing it to a past life. Secondly there could be a 'cultural' gene that passes down information from our ancestors.

  2. Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the ...

    A second difficulty is found in measuring pleasure. The balancing process brought about using the seven criteria of the hedonic calculus appears straightforward, but can different pleasures and different pains be so easily qualified? Is it possible to compare the pleasure of watching a child grow into adults with the pleasure of watching T.V?

  1. A Critical Analysis of Lao Tzu's Tao Teh Ching - Chineses philosophy.

    purpose of the intellectual activities of thinkers from various cultures and societies of the world reveals ... that philosophy is essentially a critical and systematic inquiry into the fundamental ideas or principles underlying human thought, conduct and experience. Ideas, which include the beliefs and presuppositions that we hold and cherish,

  2. The idea of miracles is a major obstacle to faith in the modern world ...

    The third claimed the majority of reported miracle occurrences happen among 'ignorant and barbarous nations', implying that ignorance is a trait of the miracle-believer. Lastly Hume made the point that different religions are mutually exclusive so the miracle claims of each with the intention of supporting it, cancel each other out.

  1. What are the principles of natural law? Every adult has the right to become ...

    For example, older couples, same sex couples, people with criminal tendencies and (in extreme cases) paedophiles. Older couples may not be able to ensure their presence to care for a child for as long as it needs it. Some would object to same sex couples having children on the grounds

  2. Outline the key ideas of the design argument.

    universe has a natural beauty that goes beyond what is necessary to live. This further supports that it is a creation of God. Some of the beauty is part of the order; our appreciation of it not only reflects our attraction to things that are aesthetically pleasing, improving our dislike of chaos.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work