• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

Extracts from this document...


The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning In the year that has elapsed since the announcement of Dolly's birth, there has been much discussion of the ethical implications of cloning humans. Although the simple use of the word "clone" may have negative connotations, many people have resigned themselves to the idea of cloning cows that produce more milk or using a cloned mouse for use in controlled experimentation. However, the idea of cloning humans is a highly charged topic. Several authors have attempted to outline some of the ethical objections to cloning while at the same time minimizing the role religion plays in this debate. The objections posed by Leon Kass and James Q. Wilson provide basic arguments that deserve consideration. Kass outlines the possibility of clones through the idea that cloning is neither inherently good nor bad in its process but that can be used to produce both good and bad results. Kass outlines three general contexts in which cloning is discussed. First he looks at the outcome of cloning on the child. One main objection to cloning is that it will naturally force parents to treat their new child differently than they would one that is born through sexual union. Technically the process of reproduction would have been different, but Kass sees no reason why parents would follow this process for producing a child unless they truly wanted it. This argument is generally used to warn others of the potential social harms that a child might face. A child that is born from cloning will be different from other children in the way he or she was created as well as in the fact that he or she will have the same genetic structure as someone else already living. This child may be faced with social pressures that he or she will have to deal with. A second argument for cloning starts with the idea of reproductive rights. ...read more.


These became the subject of study, debate, and finally, the decisions of Councils on every level - local, regional, provincial and ecumenical, all guided by the Holy Spirit. THE PRESENT STAND OF THE CHURCH Many controversial issues presented to us during these days of rapid change have reached the earliest stages in the process of dealing with controversial issues. People are beginning the search for answers - either with respect to attacks on the faith and practices of the Orthodox Church, or to new and previously unimagined problems - that can be formulated so as to preserve our salvation in Christ and to reflect the truths of the Faith. Often, since new issues arising from the rapid development of technology affect not only individual church members, but society as a whole, the attempt to answer the question for and within the Church also provides a basis for addressing these same questions on the public scene. In some cases the controversial issues can be addressed from long-standing doctrinal, ethical and canonical traditions. Where this is the case, there is little or no debate in the Church. One example is the Church's position on the legalization of abortion on demand. Since the Church went through the same debate in the early fourth century, it is not difficult to determine "the mind of the Church" on this issue, and to apply it to the current discussion. COMPLICATIONS FROM TECHNOLOGY The process, however, is not so easy in reference to the many issues which deal with the concerns arising from the amazing development of medical technology. How, for example, would the tradition of revelation address the issue of artificial insemination? The first question it would ask is if there are any implications in it from the perspective of salvation and the truths of Faith. In this case, since it clearly impinges on marriage, family, the relation between spouses, and the lives of human beings, there is an obvious connection. ...read more.


But still I like to think that even kibitzers can sometimes ask good questions. Let me try to summarize four points about medicine, morals, and religion. (1) Some people believe in God's existence; all of us believe that men exist. Our medical philosophy should therefore be humanistically, humanely motivated. If human compassion is reinforced by a theistic faith, all the better. But it is only better if the faith happens to reinforce the compassion. Alas, not all religions do. (2) Patients are persons, not just bodies. A truly human being is mental and moral as well as physical. The physical side, physiology, spontaneous or artificially supported biological functions, by themselves do not make a human being. The practice of medicine can become the ministry of medicine only if we realize that the quality of life is more important than mere quantity. Our devotion is not to life but to human life. (3) In order to be morally responsible we should not wear blinders, seeing only one patient at a time. We need a telescope to see our true obligations. In our society and culture there are so many of us and we are so interdependent that we need mathematical morality, ethical arithmetic, a statistical sense of obligation-not the first-come-first-served simple doctor-patient ethics of the horse-and buggy era. (4)We shall have to learn to live without absolutes, such as "Our sole obligation is to the patient under care" and "Life must be prolonged as long as possible" and "We must not disclose what we have learned in professional confidence" and "No cost is too much to cure a human ill." Instead of moral norms or principles of such undiscriminating and universal application we must make medical decisions by a situation ethics; what is right depends on loving concern for persons and the variables in each case. Situation ethics is clinical ethics. No good clinician finds the answer to any patient's problem in a prefabricated form out of a book. He sees the patient. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Discuss the Relationship between law and morals. Consider how far the law seeks to ...

    details of prostitutes and was charged with conspiracy to corrupt public morals. The House of Lords later upheld his conviction. Also, the widespread condemnation of incest (seen by many people as morally wrong even when both parties are adult and consenting)

  2. The key difference between someone using counselling skills and a qualified and trained counsellor ...

    she is sleeping with her boyfriend, they are both thirteen; the dilemma being that both students are under the Age of Consent. The key dilemma in all these situations is when you break confidentiality in order to maintain organisational and legal responsibilities.

  1. Explain the main ethical principle of Christianity.

    It can also be seen being active. It can be put across in a positive way in a form of prayer or a compliment, i.e., Jesus persuaded his disciples to 'pray' for the enemies. Another framework of Christian ethics is natural law. This maintains that human reason reflecting on human nature can arrive at moral wisdom and knowledge.

  2. Examine how Benthams utilitarianism may be applied to one ethical issue of your choice. ...

    hedonic calculus would agree as long as it would cause greatest good for the greatest number, even if donor would not have a say. (Pleasure of the receiver and his family must heavily outweigh the pain by the donor and his family for the transaction to be morally right, as the number of people affected is critical in Bentham's reasoning).

  1. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    An underlying problem with a paid organ donation system would be how to actually put a value on an organ. It would seem impossible to put a value on a body part, because every person would have a different

  2. Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

    This opinion is shared by many Christians today and is often the message, which is portrayed through Christian propaganda such as this. From looking at this sort of publication, it is easy to see why Catholics are so frequently blamed for the development of homophobia.

  1. Explain some of the religious and moral issues relevant to the development of new ...

    As with any issue, denominational opinions differ. The Roman Catholic Church defends traditional family structures and view IVF as unnatural. They published a document in 1987called Respect for Human Life in its Origin and the Dignity of Procreation. This emphasised the principles concerning the sanctity of life laid down much earlier in the Papal Encyclical, Humanae Vitae of 1968.

  2. How are religious and ethical principles used in the abortion debate?

    Given this emphasis, the Second Vatican Council defined abortion as 'an unspeakable crime.' However, the Methodist Church takes a much more liberal and situational approach to the problem; while it accepts that the foetus is 'obviously human', it allows that the circumstances of pregnancy, such as rape, may also be taken into account.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work