• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Ontological Argument

Extracts from this document...


The word ontological derives for the Greek word "ontos" which means "to do with being", thus forming the bases of the argument. St. Anselm was a Benedictine monk hence this argument was coming from a believer, a theistic stance which later we will see to be one of its downfalls. The argument starts with a definition, 'God is that which nothing greater can be conceived'. Anselm states that everyone is aware of this definition, therefore if everyone understands God is the greatest being God must exist because if God was only in the mind He would not be the greatest being seeing as a being is the mind everybody will agree is far less than a being in reality. Therefore Anselm states, 'God cannot be conceived not to exist. God is that, than which nothing greater can be conceived not to exist is not God.' Also Anselm supported this by stating God everyone knows as being a necessary being - therefore he could not not exist seeing as a necessary being is uncaused. ...read more.


Conclusion. Therefore God exists. He strengthened this argument by stating God must exist in the same sense a triangle must have 3 sides. Seeing as the very definition of a triangle is a three sided shape hence the very definition of God is an all perfect being hence an all existing being. By just considering the definition you are justifying the existence of both the triangle and God. Along with Anselm he said that this concept cannot be used on a being within the realms of space and time because that being would then have limitations hence not fulfil the definition of perfection. Conclusively God is perfect, there can only be 1 absolute perfect, this one being therefore has to be exempt of our world, have necessary existence and hence this is the definition of God. Therefore God must exist. The ontological argument has been widely criticised. This argument starts with the assumption of God's existence. However as Kant stated 'if there is no triangle there isn't three sides'. In the same way if you reverse the ontological argument if there is no God there is no absolute perfection. ...read more.


This is strength above the other arguments put forward for the existence of God. Secondly the argument is based on language although this could be seen as a weakness seeing as language is based on the interpretation of words and hence interpretation can be flexible. On the other hand this is the same language used in secular situations as well and the argument uses words that are defined through non religious example. For example perfection doesn't necessarily have to be describing something religious. This argument because of its properties is a very strong argument for example the fact it is a priori. Throughout the argument the theistic stance comes through. For a believer starting from the same position as Anselm this argument falls into place however for an unbeliever there are problems they cannot assume that God is perfect and hence exists, this itself is what needs to be proved. The argument has faults and gaps and hence the weaknesses do out weigh the strengths even though this is a very strong argument. ?? ?? ?? ?? The Ontological Argument Examine the major features of the ontological argument. To what extent do the strengths overcome the weaknesses? Lily Fox-Davies ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Analyze the distinctive features of the Ontological Argument

    The fool is right to demand proof that God is in fact, and not just by definition, the greatest conceivable being.Anselm stated in response that "there are necessary beings -things that cannot not exist - and contingent beings- things that may exist but whose existence is not needed".

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    If we are talking about God, and if we regard God as the source of existing things, then we could say that God is not a being. Another way of making this point is to deny that the cause of existing things is in a genus or is a genus.

  1. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    a real coin can be used for buying objects, so in this way, perhaps existence does add properties to an object; however, we are still unable to qualify existence, in the way we may qualify other predicates: to say "some cows exist", makes no logical sense, whereas to say "some

  2. strengths and weaknesses of the ontological argument

    Descartes reformed Anselm's argument in the 1600s, setting about to prove God's existence completely by reason and logic, with no dependence on the senses, which he believed to be deceptive and unreliable. Descartes argued that he was able to be sure of his own existence, by his ability to think and to doubt.

  1. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    But this being can be conceived to exist in reality. That is, we can conceive of a circumstance in which theism is true, even if we do not believe that it actually obtains. (4) But it is greater for a thing to exist in reality than for it to exist in the understanding alone.

  2. Outline the ontological argument as presented by Anselm and Descartes.

    Where Anselm speaks of 'that than which none can greater be conceived' Gaunilo occupies himself with the comparison between islands. An Island can always be bettered, for example, you can always add another tree or lagoon here or there. Islands are also contingent, they can go in and out of

  1. Utopia - The Impossibility of Perfection

    The result, as Hythloday mythically describes it, is a perfect world in which people leave in accord because they are cut off from the source of greed and envy. In this world, people develop a complete detachment to the unnecessary material life because they do not own anything except for their own bodies.

  2. Sartre is a very strong proponent of strong determinism, that is, he does not ...

    This is simply an illusion. We do have control over all of the purely mental aspects of our mind. It is only when the physical world interferes that we find limitations to this control. Perhaps the most obvious of these physical limits is that of brain damage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work