• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

Extracts from this document...


(i) What are the main advantages of utilitarianism? (21 marks) (ii) Identify the main problems of utilitarianism. To what extent do these make utilitarianism unacceptable? (9) Utilitarianism was developed by Jeremy Bentham and is a modern form of the hedonistic ethical theory which teaches that the end of human conduct is happiness, and that consequently the discrimination norm which distinguishes conduct into right and wrong pleasure and pain. The aforementioned Bentham lived in era of great social and scientific change and unrest. He therefore, because of his social surroundings developed a theory that stated that right actions are those who produce the most pleasure for everyone affected and wrong actions consequently are those who do not. He coined the phrase "the greatest good for the greatest number" which summarises his aim which was to iron out the deep inequalities of his time. Bentham being a hedonist believed that all humans naturally pursued pleasure and conversely avoids pain. ...read more.


Rule utilitarianism, which was developed by Mill, highlights the centrality of rules in morality and establishes the best overall rule by determining the course of action which results to happiness. Rule states that you must obey the rule even if it doesn't lead to the greatest pleasure. The rule should always take president over any given situation. A key distinction between Bentham's and Mills theories lie differences. Act utilitarianism was one of Bentham's key ideas. Bentham approached this idea to be that he treated each individual separately, without any rules to guide the individual. Mill on the other hand proposed that one should make rules based upon the consequences of that action. E.g. stealing tends to cause pain, so we should have a rule against stealing. So, despite supporting the same principle idea, we can see that Mill and Bentham arrived at two very different approaches to morality, with Mill avoiding some of the fundamental and debateable idea put forward by Bentham. ...read more.


In addition, with negative utilitarianism; the good could possibly mean people being happy and the bad could mean people being un-happy, or the good is people getting what they want in life and the bad is people not getting what they want out of life. Although most utilitarian's agree that whatever the good and bad are, we ought to bring about as much of the former and as little of the latter as possible. E.g. suppose that I have a choice to make: I can either make the happiest man in the world even happier than he already is, or I can alleviate some of the suffering of the unhappiest man in the world. This would mean that if I were to alleviate some of the suffering from the unhappiest man, the happiest man would still be happy and not affected from the choice but yet the unhappiest man becomes happier than he already was. Therefore, I should always choose to alleviate suffering rather than promoting happiness. ?? ?? ?? ?? Kerrie Freeman ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay


The student makes lots of accurate and good points in this essay and describes utilitarianism for the most part correctly (with the exception of the second question where a number of mistakes are made). Unfortunately the student does not answer either of the questions that have been set. In consequence almost everything that has been written is irrelevant.

Marked by teacher David Moss 31/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Situation ethics

    3 star(s)

    Only love is good in and of itself. Actions aren't intrinsically good or evil, they are good depending on whether they promote the most loving result. Secondly, "the ruling of norm Christian decision is love, nothing else." Love replaces law as Jesus broke the commandment which love demanded.

  2. "All Religious Language is meaningless"

    Aquinas himself admitted that 'we know that God is, but not what God is'. So to the atheist or agnostic there is still difficulty in talking meaningfully about God, or reaching common ground when discussing religious beliefs. If then straight language fails, perhaps we can use symbol.

  1. Explain the difference between Act and rule utilitarianism

    of the hedonic calculus which has 7 criteria's which are used as a guide to weigh up the pleasure of pains in a situation, this is so that they know how to act regarding a situation and know how much pleasure would be produced, therefore they would hope the consequence

  2. Explain how belief in the Sanctity of Life may influence ethical approaches to Abortion.

    According to Aquinas, our purpose was to abide by the 5 primary precepts; preserve life, be educated, reproduce, live in society and to worship God. Preserving life, as one of the primary precepts of Natural Law means that the Sanctity of Life would be used here in cases of Abortion

  1. Explain the strengths of natural law

    It takes the view that there are common rules that apply to all people in all communities and there for is easy to follow as a rule is a rule and should not be broken. This is very strong strength of natural law and gives a good approach to ethics.

  2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the teleological, deontological and hybrid systems of ethics ...

    is more likely to survive, as it will consider the two patients, their families and situation and the cost of both their treatments, thus we are more able to come to a loving conclusion to benefit the majority. This leads to the next strength that the teleological system is most likely to benefit the majority.

  1. Explain the main differences between Act and Rule Utilitarianism

    So for example, if you are in a situation where lying would bring about the greatest good then, you should lie. Utilitarians support the view that it is the value of the consequences of the particular act that count, so if breaking the law would lead to the greatest good

  2. Evaluate the claim that the soul is distinct from the body:

    Richard Dawkins is also a famous figure that discredits Plato, he too is a monist and argues that we are just a product of our genes. Our bodies enable our genes to survive and be passed on. He argues that the concept of the soul is mythological, in the same way as God of the gaps argument.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work