• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Theories of Resurrection of the body are logically coherent - Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Theories of Resurrection of the body are logically coherent - discuss. The idea of bodily resurrection remains a 'grey' area for many philosophers, this is why there's such a variation between interpretations of post-mortem existence, or even doubt as to whether there is an existence after life, as we know it. The nature of this topic is complex since there's no way to gain eschatological proof to verify or falsify any theories of post-mortem existence. There are four main types of life after death incorporating a disembodied existence or survival of the body: Bodily Resurrection, Dualism, Monism and Reincarnation. A large part of Christianity is the belief that death is not the end, but merely the end to physical life and the beginning to a new stage of life. Christian's believe that when we die there is a 'particular judgement', where God judges us on our actions throughout our life, upon this judgement humans will either be rewarded in Heaven or punished in Hell, depending on how moral they've been. The Bible mentions how following the death there will be a resurrection, but it doesn't state whether this will be physical or spiritual. ...read more.

Middle

Other Dualists such as Descartes and Kant have also distinguished the body from the soul. Descartes famously said 'I think therefore I am', he demonstrates how we consider ourselves thinking beings distinct from the body. Kant also suggests that the soul is for thinking, but refers to this as 'reason'. Kant suggests how we need to separate the soul from the bodily desires to make reasonable moral decisions, so the soul can reach Summon Bonum (the Supreme Happiness). Following these beliefs, both Plato and Price deduced that the soul/mind will live on because the body is finite. This implies that theories that suggest bodily resurrection are incoherent, since it is the soul/mind, which are eternal, and that body is finite and therefore cannot exist after death. Whilst other dualists such as Descartes and Kant, believed that the 'thinking' or 'reasoning' function of the soul makes it superior from the body, and thus they also would believed that bodily resurrection is incoherent because it is the soul that is capable of a post-mortem existence. Alternatively, Monists would believe that any belief in the afterlife is incoherent, disagreeing with Christianity, Hick and Dualists. ...read more.

Conclusion

Both these religious theories follow the idea of karma and suggest an almost dualist distinction of body and 'soul' (self/consciousness). Both would call the idea of bodily resurrection logically incoherent since they're monotheistic and follow their religious doctrines, through meditation and 'indoctrination' of texts. However, arguably the lack of eschatological proof makes these religious theories just as incoherent since there is no proof to verify faith. On balance, I think the four main theories on the afterlife: bodily resurrection, dualism, rebirth and monism, could all be deemed illogical and incoherent by an opposing theory, principally since the nature of this topic makes all theories unverifiable. However, at the same time Hick claims that his argument is coherent since it cannot be falsified, and covers all the 'gaps' in his argument by claiming that we'll find out eschatologically, whilst Christianity claims an accessible personal relationship with God would be proof. Therefore, I think for Christians and supporters of Hick their theories may seem logical and coherent, but for other theories there may seem a lack of proof and thus deem bodily resurrection as illogical and incoherent; I this is because faith is unverifiable and ultimately no theory is more coherent than another. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Theories of the resurrection of the body are logically coherent.

    4 star(s)

    The soul is separate from the body being immortal but is incarnated within the mortal body. Therefore, at death, the body ceases to exist, whereas, the soul goes on existing. This way a dualist who believes in the reality of the soul can argue against the resurrection of the body whilst, at the same time, arguing for life after death.

  2. An embodied life in heaven is entirely possible. Discuss.

    For Aristotle, all living things have souls. There are varying degrees of functionality within the different soul types in the hierarchy, the human soul being considered the highest. In conclusion, for Aristotle the soul is separate from the body, however, it is dependant upon it.

  1. How successful are Descartes' arguments for the real distinction of mind from body? Upon ...

    from each other so that only one works in affect separating them. Whether this means that minds and bodies are completely separate from each other though or simply an extension of each other is a more difficult matter. The opposition to this argument mainly opposes the fact that Descartes's requires

  2. Plato & The Soul

    Through control and practical application of reason, Plato believed in dependent reincarnation. The soul of a philosopher would escape the continuous state of birth and death and rebirth and would return to the world of the forms; however he was unclear whether that soul could once again plummet to earth and be trapped in a mortal body.

  1. Belief in life after death is only coherent if we believe in resurrection. Discuss

    However, in my view, the coherency of belief in life after death hinges on personal identity, which is understood by Stephen T Davis first and foremost to be a metaphysical problem, questioning what criteria should be used for identifying and re-identifying persons.

  2. The Concept of Life After Death is Incoherent - Discuss.

    Protestants however hold a much more varied view of life after death. Some interpret the resurrection as a spiritual even that involves the soul going to God but not requiring a physical body. The protestant idea of resurrection also tends to foresee heaven that is a community where people meet and recognise one another.

  1. Examine the key concepts associated with two of the following: Immortality of the ...

    Discuss the claim that the belief in life after death is credible. Life after death is credible to a large extent, as there is a large of percentage of people who believe in it. A study carried out between October and November 2009 showed that out of 2,060 people,

  2. Explain the fundamental ideas of resurrection and immortality of the soul. (18)

    a fundamental principle because it dictates what happens in the afterlife whether the soul goes to heaven like Descartes believes or goes on to be reunited with another body and is resurrected as believed by Aquinas. Another fundamental idea of resurrection is how we receive the resurrected body.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work