• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Theories of Resurrection of the body are logically coherent - Discuss

Extracts from this document...


Theories of Resurrection of the body are logically coherent - discuss. The idea of bodily resurrection remains a 'grey' area for many philosophers, this is why there's such a variation between interpretations of post-mortem existence, or even doubt as to whether there is an existence after life, as we know it. The nature of this topic is complex since there's no way to gain eschatological proof to verify or falsify any theories of post-mortem existence. There are four main types of life after death incorporating a disembodied existence or survival of the body: Bodily Resurrection, Dualism, Monism and Reincarnation. A large part of Christianity is the belief that death is not the end, but merely the end to physical life and the beginning to a new stage of life. Christian's believe that when we die there is a 'particular judgement', where God judges us on our actions throughout our life, upon this judgement humans will either be rewarded in Heaven or punished in Hell, depending on how moral they've been. The Bible mentions how following the death there will be a resurrection, but it doesn't state whether this will be physical or spiritual. ...read more.


Other Dualists such as Descartes and Kant have also distinguished the body from the soul. Descartes famously said 'I think therefore I am', he demonstrates how we consider ourselves thinking beings distinct from the body. Kant also suggests that the soul is for thinking, but refers to this as 'reason'. Kant suggests how we need to separate the soul from the bodily desires to make reasonable moral decisions, so the soul can reach Summon Bonum (the Supreme Happiness). Following these beliefs, both Plato and Price deduced that the soul/mind will live on because the body is finite. This implies that theories that suggest bodily resurrection are incoherent, since it is the soul/mind, which are eternal, and that body is finite and therefore cannot exist after death. Whilst other dualists such as Descartes and Kant, believed that the 'thinking' or 'reasoning' function of the soul makes it superior from the body, and thus they also would believed that bodily resurrection is incoherent because it is the soul that is capable of a post-mortem existence. Alternatively, Monists would believe that any belief in the afterlife is incoherent, disagreeing with Christianity, Hick and Dualists. ...read more.


Both these religious theories follow the idea of karma and suggest an almost dualist distinction of body and 'soul' (self/consciousness). Both would call the idea of bodily resurrection logically incoherent since they're monotheistic and follow their religious doctrines, through meditation and 'indoctrination' of texts. However, arguably the lack of eschatological proof makes these religious theories just as incoherent since there is no proof to verify faith. On balance, I think the four main theories on the afterlife: bodily resurrection, dualism, rebirth and monism, could all be deemed illogical and incoherent by an opposing theory, principally since the nature of this topic makes all theories unverifiable. However, at the same time Hick claims that his argument is coherent since it cannot be falsified, and covers all the 'gaps' in his argument by claiming that we'll find out eschatologically, whilst Christianity claims an accessible personal relationship with God would be proof. Therefore, I think for Christians and supporters of Hick their theories may seem logical and coherent, but for other theories there may seem a lack of proof and thus deem bodily resurrection as illogical and incoherent; I this is because faith is unverifiable and ultimately no theory is more coherent than another. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Theories of the resurrection of the body are logically coherent.

    4 star(s)

    The soul is separate from the body being immortal but is incarnated within the mortal body. Therefore, at death, the body ceases to exist, whereas, the soul goes on existing. This way a dualist who believes in the reality of the soul can argue against the resurrection of the body whilst, at the same time, arguing for life after death.

  2. An embodied life in heaven is entirely possible. Discuss.

    One aspect of Plato's embodied theory concept is the idea that the soul has existed prior the body and therefore had understanding of the world of the forms.

  1. How successful are Descartes' arguments for the real distinction of mind from body? Upon ...

    from each other so that only one works in affect separating them. Whether this means that minds and bodies are completely separate from each other though or simply an extension of each other is a more difficult matter. The opposition to this argument mainly opposes the fact that Descartes's requires

  2. Belief in life after death is only coherent if we believe in resurrection. Discuss

    However, in my view, the coherency of belief in life after death hinges on personal identity, which is understood by Stephen T Davis first and foremost to be a metaphysical problem, questioning what criteria should be used for identifying and re-identifying persons.

  1. The Concept of Life After Death is Incoherent - Discuss.

    Protestants however hold a much more varied view of life after death. Some interpret the resurrection as a spiritual even that involves the soul going to God but not requiring a physical body. The protestant idea of resurrection also tends to foresee heaven that is a community where people meet and recognise one another.

  2. Examine the key concepts associated with two of the following: Immortality of the ...

    While Dr. Rowan Williams, suggests that one should expand on what one thinks about the Resurrection. Resurrection might be ?not describable?not an event, with a before and after, occupying a determinate bit of time.? The best understanding of the ?nature? of the Resurrection may be recognising how much one cannot presume anything about its nature in an event.

  1. Examine the concepts of immortality of the soul with resurrection of the body - ...

    When the body dies, the soul cannot exist in a world of physical material, and so must escape back to the spiritual realm where it will contemplate truth, beauty and goodness. Plato supported the perception of dualism and put forward two arguments in backing it up.

  2. To what extent is the omnipotence of God a logically coherent concept?

    On greater explanation Descartes concept of God?s omnipotence becomes logically coherent, as it does make sense that God would be able to do everything, even things that are outside of our understanding. However there are still some logical and philosophical problems when the question is posed does being omnipotent mean

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work