• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There are many arguments for and against Utilitarianism and whether it provides an adequate basis for making moral decisions

Extracts from this document...


Utilitarianism is the greatest good of the greatest number. It takes the view that an action is right if it is likely to produce the best consequences compared to all the other possible actions. The best consequences are those which involve the maximization of what is good and the minimization of what is bad. The worst consequences are which involve the maximization of what is bad and the minimization of what is good. The basic premise is the idea that the greatest good comes from creating happiness for the greatest number of people. Pleasure and freedom of pain are the only things desirable as ends. In Utilitarianism it is the greatest happiness of everyone involved which is right, so one must be impartial to one's own happiness. Utilitarianism takes the view that if needed, you should sacrifice your own happiness for greater pleasure of others. For Utilitarianism bases action on pleasure and pain. It clearly takes pleasure to be desirable as it recommends producing greatest pleasure and minimal pain. ...read more.


Therefore, if a police detective was a Utilitarian, and under pressure to find the attacker, then he would feel it was right to convict an innocent man just to make the greater number of people feel safer and therefore happier. This also means a Utilitarian could not differentiate between an accidental death and a murder. Despite the actions or intentions being obviously different, the consequences or result, the person dying, are exactly the same. There is no question as to whether or not this example assists in, or provides an adequate basis for, making moral decisions, as it is morally wrong to convict someone who is completely innocent. The deterrence theory, which is used by people opposing the Utilitarian argument, is where a Utilitarian would feel it is okay to punish innocent people to promote deterrence to other potential criminals. In the example of the society mentioned before, Utilitarianism takes the view that it would be good and an obligation of the detective's to convict an innocent man to scare off any other rapists. ...read more.


There can also be a lot of circumstances where the right action is the one to have the best consequence. For example a father likes to play golf on Sunday but the circus is coming to town and his three children would be very happy if they could go. Therefore if the father were a Utilitarian he would realise that his three children's happiness is more than his individual happiness and he would take them to the circus, which is a good thing to do. Lastly, most of the things near-universally agreed to be good are things which make people happy, and most of the things near-universally agreed to be bad are things which make most people unhappy. Which is also the view that Utilitarians take - maximum happiness for the majority and minimum unhappiness for the majority. In conclusion, Utilitarianism does provide an adequate basis for making moral decisions to an extent as it is good and morally right to promote as much happiness as possible and the greatest good for the greatest number is therefore right. However the principle of justice and individual rights are ignored in Utilitarianism especially where autonomy and deterrence are concerned, as the innocent should definitely not be punished. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how moral decisions should be made according to: Act and Rule utilitarianism

    3 star(s)

    So a person can commit murder if it causes the greatest happiness. The benefits of act utilitarianism are that its democratic view, it takes account of the majority of people rather than individuals.

  2. Explain how Benthams version of Utilitarianism may be used to decide the right cause ...

    pain which you would cause and subsequently stop yourself from hurting them. You have to think of other people's pleasure and pain rather than just your own. This is mainly used in preference utilitarianism as Hare put it 'standing in someone else's shoes'.

  1. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    It often involves what many political philosophies would see as an erosion of civil rights and freedoms - lack of a private life and suppression of religious beliefs, for example. Obviously, there are differing degrees of authoritarianism and even the most democratic and liberal state must exercise its authority upon

  2. What is the most telling objection to Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle?

    Special relationships and responsibilities as a result form. The rightness of these responsibilities does not necessarily derive from the fact that they increase the sum total of human happiness. For example two men are drowning, one your father and the other a scientist with the cure to cancer, who would you save?

  1. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    to other distortions of perception which may occur naturally without our awareness. In fairness, it is not. Furthermore, Immanuel Kant would argue with Descartes over this issue stating that - the human mind imposes order on our experiences and in reality we do not know with certainty the source of the sensations that the mind organises.

  2. Utilitarianism. Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make ...

    This also says how advertising can effect what we desire. This links to the idea of 'is there anything more important that happiness?' for example justice. The second main problem is the idea of consequences. There are three things to cinder when making a decision to bring the greatest pleasure to the greatest number of people.

  1. Introduction to Philosophy.

    It is the borderline between the body and soul. This is also the inferior part of the soul. Enthusiasm, anger, and emotions. It is a higher stage then desire It is the higher stage. One here finds knowledge and the love for knowledge.

  2. What makes a person valuable?

    In spite of that, a point could be that those who willingly choose to act as if their consciousness levels are lower from those who are good intentionally, are the ones that are less of a person as they are doing the wrong out of their own accord, their own

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work