• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There are many arguments for and against Utilitarianism and whether it provides an adequate basis for making moral decisions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Utilitarianism is the greatest good of the greatest number. It takes the view that an action is right if it is likely to produce the best consequences compared to all the other possible actions. The best consequences are those which involve the maximization of what is good and the minimization of what is bad. The worst consequences are which involve the maximization of what is bad and the minimization of what is good. The basic premise is the idea that the greatest good comes from creating happiness for the greatest number of people. Pleasure and freedom of pain are the only things desirable as ends. In Utilitarianism it is the greatest happiness of everyone involved which is right, so one must be impartial to one's own happiness. Utilitarianism takes the view that if needed, you should sacrifice your own happiness for greater pleasure of others. For Utilitarianism bases action on pleasure and pain. It clearly takes pleasure to be desirable as it recommends producing greatest pleasure and minimal pain. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore, if a police detective was a Utilitarian, and under pressure to find the attacker, then he would feel it was right to convict an innocent man just to make the greater number of people feel safer and therefore happier. This also means a Utilitarian could not differentiate between an accidental death and a murder. Despite the actions or intentions being obviously different, the consequences or result, the person dying, are exactly the same. There is no question as to whether or not this example assists in, or provides an adequate basis for, making moral decisions, as it is morally wrong to convict someone who is completely innocent. The deterrence theory, which is used by people opposing the Utilitarian argument, is where a Utilitarian would feel it is okay to punish innocent people to promote deterrence to other potential criminals. In the example of the society mentioned before, Utilitarianism takes the view that it would be good and an obligation of the detective's to convict an innocent man to scare off any other rapists. ...read more.

Conclusion

There can also be a lot of circumstances where the right action is the one to have the best consequence. For example a father likes to play golf on Sunday but the circus is coming to town and his three children would be very happy if they could go. Therefore if the father were a Utilitarian he would realise that his three children's happiness is more than his individual happiness and he would take them to the circus, which is a good thing to do. Lastly, most of the things near-universally agreed to be good are things which make people happy, and most of the things near-universally agreed to be bad are things which make most people unhappy. Which is also the view that Utilitarians take - maximum happiness for the majority and minimum unhappiness for the majority. In conclusion, Utilitarianism does provide an adequate basis for making moral decisions to an extent as it is good and morally right to promote as much happiness as possible and the greatest good for the greatest number is therefore right. However the principle of justice and individual rights are ignored in Utilitarianism especially where autonomy and deterrence are concerned, as the innocent should definitely not be punished. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how moral decisions should be made according to: Act and Rule utilitarianism

    3 star(s)

    It is good that a whole nation is being saved but it is no pleasure for the people who are being tortured. Mill looked at the quality of the result. To tackle this problem, Mill developed a system of higher and lower pleasures.

  2. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    parts; failing to see the 'wood for the trees' as some may say... Ryle advocated something known as philosophical behaviourism - all mental events are really physical events interpreted in a mental way. Thus our mind is not a separate entity but just a term meaning what we do with our physical bodies.

  1. What are Mill’s four main arguments in defence of freedom of speech?

    It fact there are any number of outside influences which may have contributed to this perceived lapse into hypocrisy which it is out with the scope of this essay to discuss. It remains, however, that each example of a possible cause of this lapse detracts from the strength of Mill's argument.

  2. Utilitarianism. Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make ...

    The problem being that there is no way of actually, accurately calculating the amount of pleasure. The main problem being that we can never for definite, say what the consequences of the action will be and therefore we cannot say how much happiness will come out of it.

  1. Explain how Benthams version of Utilitarianism may be used to decide the right cause ...

    This use of utilitarianism is great because it makes people picture and understand other people's point of view for example; if you were to hit someone then instead of carrying out the action, you would think about the outcome - picture yourself in the other person's shoes - understand that

  2. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    This could, obviously, mean the annihilation of the human race, but it seems to mean just cleansing the mind of incorrect ideas. He then acknowledges that putting it 'into practice would be difficult' - which it wouldn't, if they just forced people into obeying, which makes it seem like he

  1. Pamela Michael's The Gift Of Rivers and Dan Millman's mini-series, Way Of The Peaceful ...

    What the child understands to be real is based on the truth in the sensation of knowing exactly what the experience has brought forth. The child has absolutely nothing to worry about because everything is new. If people learn to accept the fact that "[t]here are no ordinary moments" (p.143)

  2. What makes a person valuable?

    will, it?s what they are choosing to do and vice versa to those who are deemed to be morally good. So use this point for those who are less able, they are not intentionally less able than others, they didn?t choose to be like that, they were either born that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work