• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There are many challenges raised against utilitarianism that weaken the theory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent do these features survive the challenges levelled against utilitarianism? There are many challenges raised against utilitarianism that weaken the theory. The theory highlights pleasure and happiness to be the most important things in life but there are other feelings other than these which are needed for a good life. These include feelings such as honor, generosity and honesty. Other ideals such as love, truth and justice may not always make people happy but they are still good, however this theory does not take them into account when judging the goodness of an action and only focuses on the level of pain or happiness. As well as this, no credit is given to the motivation behind an action but the attitude should be considered. ...read more.

Middle

Another challenge raised against the theory is the fact that it is subjective and it forces you to regard everyone and all pleasures as equal, however different things make different people happy. Something that may give a person great pleasure, such as eating chocolate, may not produce as much pleasure for another person therefore it cannot be classified as a certain type of pleasure. This is also a criticism of Mill?s idea of higher and lower pleasures. Mill attempts to classify higher pleasures as those which are intellectual and lower pleasures as bodily, however there is no universal agreement as to what is considered to be a higher or lower pleasure and so it is difficult to distinguish between them. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, as the interests of the majority are considered to be more important, the minority is being ignored. A particular action may produce pleasure for a greater number of people but there are other people that may be affected but are not considered. The majority may be happy but the same action may cause a minority group pain. Overall, utilitarianism does not survive the challenges levelled against it because there are many aspects of it that make it difficult to apply it to real life situations. Actions and their consequences are too complex to be simply justified by the happiness and pleasure that they would produce. The theory also does not consider other factors (such as honor) that a person needs to have a good life as it is only focused on happiness. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Why are justice and integrity problematic for utilitarianism?

    The case presented most often for the purpose of this discussion is that raised by McCloskey of the scapegoat.3 If it is that by imprisoning an innocent person as a scapegoat, that eventually the real criminals will be caught and thus there will be overall greater happiness, would utilitarianism rule that this is a moral action?

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    Nietzsche believed that language had a huge influence on the current view of morality, and he argued that it was an error within the construction of language that had allowed the error within our morality to arise. The subject-predicate distinction, Nietzsche argued implies a choice - and therefore a blame - that doesn't exist.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work