• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To get to heaven you must behave morally. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


To get to heaven you must behave morally. Discuss. Heaven is the Christian concept of eternal good life after death. How one gets there is disputed amongst Christians, but if it's possible to even get there is a matter debated by philosophers and scientists. If the existence of a life after death can be disproved, then it follows that there is no necessity for behaving morally to achieve life after death. Even if heaven does exist, it does not necessarily mean that one has to behave morally to get there. This statement assumes the existence of heaven and the ability to behave morally. The existence of heaven is only held by Christians, therefore anyone who does not believe in God would not see behaving morally as a means for getting into heaven, as it does not exist. Furthermore, the ability to behave morally is not necessarily true. From the viewpoint of determinism we are unable to behave morally as we are already pre-determined in our behaviour. ...read more.


if we are free to go against God's teachings and still end up in heaven? Other Christians such as Augustine argued against this point, saying that only those who do behave morally will get to heaven. This view has it's own problems. What of those who cannot behave morally, for they cannot distinguish between right and wrong? And is it right to punish a man for eternity because of one act he did in his time on earth? This former criticism is further justified through the existence of determinism. If he was pre-determined to act amorally, then he should not be held eternally responsible. Furthermore, this only works for Christians. He does not take into account any other religions, non-believers and agnostics. Therefore, only Christians would agree with the above statement, and only those who believe in judgement day would agree with Augustine's ideas. As the statement relies on the assumption of a life after death, those who dispute its existence are obviously going to criticise the need for behaving morally. ...read more.


While there is no proof for heaven, there is no proof that one doesn't exist either. If we take this approach that morals have come from society and individuals, then the concept of a conscience is destroyed. For without universal concepts of morality, then what we perceive as such through our conscience is far from given by God. Kant's moral theory points towards a God. He argues that morals are absolute and exist outside of us. On one level Kant would therefore agree with the statement. However, he also outlined why we should act moray. He argued that we should only act for duties sake (categorical imperatives) and not on the basis to achieve something (categorical imperatives). Therefore if we act morally not for duties sake, but to get to heaven surely we are using a categorical imperative? In conclusion, it is not clear if it is necessary to behave morally as it is not clear whether it is required to reach heaven, or in fact if heaven exists. It is clear that behaving morally should be an agenda of all, regardless of their beliefs of life after death however. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christianity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Christianity essays

  1. Cyrano de Bergerac Act V Character List.

    Ragueneau: *Speaks of Cyrano's injury to Le Bret: "After all, I had rather-You are here-She need not know so soon-I went to see him just now-Our friend-As I came near his door, I saw him coming out.

  2. Literary Criticism of Uncle Tom's Cabin [Psychological Lense].

    Slave Act, clearly showing that he was not about to help any type of runaway slaves. But, his wife was a very Christian woman with morality that ran through her veins, and she lived by the Bible. Her struggle was to convince her husband that slavery was wrong and he

  1. Abortion, a christians view.

    However, all Muslims, including those who permit abortion in certain cases still regard abortion as wrong, but they do not regard it as a punishable offence. They agree that the more advanced the pregnancy, the more it is wrong. A slightly more liberal opinion is that if, in the early

  2. The Ideas of Hell and Purgatory: A Wide Shift from Then to Now.

    "Recently, there has been a softening of this positions, as many conservative Christians have gradually moved away from the necessity of being saved while alive. They believe that those who die without having heard the Gospel will be given some form of other opportunity to be saved - by some

  1. Descartes logically proved the existence of an infinite and truthful being - Discuss.

    Therefore an infinitely wise being, God, would not do this. He doesn't do this. The separation is not a passing of judgement. God makes rules and lets you choose your path. If you chose one that would land you in hell, then God will give you the opportunity to repent and clean your soul of that mortal sin.

  2. A study of the New Testaments’ teachings, on adultery and homosexuality- How might ...

    or both of who are married with someone other than the marriage partner." In Mathew 5:27 Jesus said "You have heard how it is said: You must not commit adultery. But I say this to you if a man looks at a woman lustfully, he has already committed adultery with her in his heart."

  1. Christian Morality

    The three traditions that have developed their own teachings are: 1. The Roman Catholic Church 2. The Orthodox Church 3. The Protestant or Reformed Church Protestants on one hand view the importance of traditions as; they stress the important source of moral teaching.

  2. Gods omniscience and omnibenevolence are compatible. Discuss.

    There seems no reference to these outside things within the nature of our reality, suggesting Hegel?s argument is not true, which may therefore ask us to question why we should accept God?s decision not to give us perfect judgement, if it is not for the needs of the perfect universe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work