• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent would a follower of Natural Law allow euthanasia?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent would a follower of Natural Law allow euthanasia? A follower of Natural Law, who took each aspect completely literally, would never allow euthanasia. This is because the five Primary Precepts clearly contradict this action. The Primary Precept that euthanasia undoubtedly defies is 'the preservation of human life'. As the Primary Precepts are what Aquinas deems to be our purpose on earth, euthanasia goes against these guidelines because it is assisting someone to end their life so that they are no longer living. Although this is the only Primary Precept that euthanasia openly contradicts, in actuality, euthanasia goes against all the Primary Precepts of 'reproduction', 'the nurture and education of the young', 'living peacefully in society' and 'to worship God' because if you are dead, then you cannot do these things. The Primary Precepts are all deontological and therefore have no room for leeway. In contrast, the Secondary Precepts are teleological and can change on special and rare occasions as Aquinas himself showed when he went against the Primary Precept of 'reproduction' because he was a monk. ...read more.

Middle

However, according to Natural Law, there are interior and exterior acts. The interior act (the intention) and the exterior act (the action) are both of equal importance, according to Aquinas, and as a result, both must be good to result in a good act. This means that followers of Natural Law may not agree with any forms of euthanasia because even if the intention is good e.g. relieving pain, the act of assisting in someone's suicide, either actively or passively is wrong. On the other hand, followers of Natural Law may accept passive euthanasia but not active euthanasia based on the Doctrine of Double Effect. Active euthanasia involves doing something deliberate that leads to someone's death which is a bad act, possibly leading to a good consequence, whereas, passive euthanasia occurs when the patient dies because the medical professionals either do not do something necessary to keep the patient alive, or when they stop doing something that is keeping the patient alive e.g. not performing a life-extending operation. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, the characteristics that people are said to need to possess in order to be a person are not always possessed by children and therefore some people see it as acceptable to commit infanticide in view of these traits. Most people would consider infanticide to be a barbaric practise and think that although children may not yet possess these traits they have the potential to in the future. This causes us to question if euthanasia is not also a barbaric practise and if someone is in a coma, they also have the potential to develop these traits one day too. This leads many Natural Law followers to accept euthanasia on the basis that some humans do not have personhood, but reject euthanasia if the human has the potential to develop personhood e.g. if a person is in a coma. Although manipulation of Natural Law means there are times in which euthanasia could be acceptable, most people would generally accept that Natural Law would never justify euthanasia due to the five Primary Precepts which are clearly opposed to it. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain how a follower of natural law might approach the issues surrounding Abortion.

    Even though there are a few exceptions, these are only in the worst of situations, and on the whole, abortion is entirely wrong according to Natural Law. 'A foetus is not a person' Discuss. There are many different opinions and arguments as to when a Foetus becomes a person, and

  2. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    There is no particular solution for any of these issues. There is only hope that ethical standards and social responsibilities will guide every manager throughout his or her career.

  1. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    We now live in the age of the disposable human being. One might be tempted to jokingly ask "What will they think of next?" The problem, though, is that no one has been thinking at all. Where is the necessity in the Death Penalty?

  2. RE euthanasia for and against

    As soon as this stops being a possibility, they should have the choice to opt for euthanasia if they wish. Pro-life on the other hand promotes the sanctity of life, which is based on the view that life is sacred and God given.

  1. Ethical Issues Involved In The Legislation of Euthanasia?

    * Human life is a basic good as opposed to an instrumental good, a good in itself rather than as a means to an end. * Human life is sacred because it's a gift from God Therefore the deliberate taking of human life should be prohibited except in self-defence or the legitimate defence of others.

  2. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    There are strict SL proponents who do not allow some life to be sacrificed to save more life. In the life-boat cases in which the passengers draw lots to kill and eat one of their number, these proponents have asserted that each passenger had a duty to starve to death before taking another life.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work