• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Utilitarianism.After Bentham had established that pleasure and pain were the important factors in determining whether an action was right or wrong, he developed the utility principle.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Utilitarianism A) Utilitarianism is all about the utility of something, it doesn't look at the action itself it looks the end result meaning it is a teleological argument. The argument tries to decide what action would lead to the most happiness for the most people. The first basic Utilitarian statement "the greatest happiness for the greatest number" was first written by Francis Hutcheson an English philosopher, although it almost always attributed to Jeremy Bentham. While utilitarianism was only officially an argument since Francis Hutcheson wrote it down other philosopher did consider the argument, like Epicurus who believed that happiness was the guiding principle ethical principle. Jeremy Bentham was a very clever person; he was born in London in 1978 and began studying Latin at the age of three. He went to Queen's college, oxford and graduated at the age of fifteen, his family had all been barristers, and now so was he. But for Bentham there was so much more he could be doing, eventually he became a philosopher and a campaigner. He was always trying to change things for the better, he tried to reform the legal and political systems, and he campaigned against imprisonment for debt and also for creating a civil service recruited by examination. In 1789 he published he major work containing ethical ideas, "an introduction to the principles of morals and legalisation". Bentham was a reductive empiricist, from this he reasoned that pleasure was good and pain was bad, he said, "Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. ...read more.

Middle

Mill thought that the pleasures of the mind were higher than physical pleasures. He believed that because bodily pleasures like eating were needed that when we were faced to chose between a bodily pleasure and a mental pleasure a person would chose the pleasure of the mind, like enjoying fine art. Unlike Bentham Mill was a rule utilitarian, a rule utilitarian try to look problems more logically when faced with a problem they will do the thing that brings the greatest good for the community and not for the greatest number. A rule utilitarian would never lie because while lying may bring the greatest good for the greatest number it would not bring the greatest good for the community. Going back to Mills idea of higher and lower pleasures he said that "it is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied" some philosopher would argue that he is, one of them being Peter Singer he believed that pleasure should not only be for Humans and that non-humans should be taken into consideration as well. He also decided that the rule should not be pleasure, but "the best interest" of those involved, because who is to decide what pleasure is for some one else. Another person who disagrees with Bentham's and Mills idea for utilitarianism is R.M. hare he wrote a book the langue of morals about it, he believes that there is not one idea of happiness as suggested in Bentham and Mills ideas, but the right thing to do is maximise the satisfaction of the preference of each individual involved. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example somebody is murdered you had nothing to do with the murder but you are still arrested, you are then tried and sentenced to death despite the fact you had nothing to do with the murder. Later people decide that this crime is far too dangerous to commit so it stops happening, utilitarianism would say this is ok, but somebody is dead because something someone else did. This is called Expediency. The thought of this happening did horrify Mill, but Mill decided that to solve this problem there would be a hierarchy of principles, and the first principle would be justice. He is therefore a rule utilitarian. One principle (he calls it a maxim) is: "The moral rules which forbid mankind to hurt one another (in which we must never forget to included wrongful interference with each other's freedom) are more virtual to human well-being than any maxims, however important, which only point out the best mode managing some department of human affairs." Mill was always in favour of justice, but he did oppose the book on liberty, which argued for justice and individual liberty, and also it was questionable whether utilitarianism allowed justice. So it remains to be seen how in favour of justice he was. In conclusion utilitarianism is a well thought out ethical theory that has a lot of flexibility to change around its critiques. But having said that I do thing that it's impractical to use any ethical on every situation, because as the critiques have shown it's only after the ethical theories have faltered that it can be change to suit the best outcome, in my opinion a person should just trust there instincts. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. What are the Main Features of Utilitarianism as an Ethical Theory?

    substitute for the failure of experience and the critic would claim that the grounds for such and ideal are arbitrary. At the heart of Mill's utilitarianism, there is a paradox. As a utilitarian, he should, to be consistent, justify all his claims about the superiority of intellectual pursuits based on experience i.e., 'a posteriori'.

  2. Explain the main ethical principle of Christianity.

    It is to act with reason. The idea was that people had a kind nature and evil thoughts didn't enter people's minds. They were loving, and therefore that would mean that their reason was positive and good. The final framework of Christian ethics is situation ethics.

  1. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    Moreover, if a paid system was introduced, it is probable that more unsuitable candidates would come forward for donation - those who are less affluent and perhaps are in bad condition from drinking, drugs or solvent abuse or just in poor health - and all the organs that are offered must be screened.

  2. Examine the key features of utilitarianism and its strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    So, under Bentham's theory it would be possible to justify acts of sadism or torture if the majority, no matter how perverse the pleasure, carried them out. Mill's qualitative principle does go some way to addressing this weakness, however, as is explained now.

  1. Essay on Law vs. Justice

    Another issue is equal employment opportunities for everyone. Although a lot has been done to destroy the system that kept women and minorities away from the top management positions, many corporations still rely on white men's stereotypes and prejudice. Women are considered just as accessories for men and are not treated equally.

  2. Evaluate the claim that conscience is a reliable guide to ethical decision making.

    idea that the quality of conscience must be relate to the quality of knowledge the conscience is presented with, accounts for a 'potentially infallible' conscience while admitting basic flaws in the Universe. Cardinal Newman differs from all of the previous scholars in that he believes that the starting point for all conscience is God.

  1. Does everyone have a right to a child?

    I believe that they should not use a surrogate mother because the child would not have their true mother and it is unfair to the child as they are born without their mother so I believe that the embryos should be destroyed.

  2. Explain how moral decisions should be made using the Hedonic Calculus.

    action that produces the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people, because then both pleasure and happiness are created, meaning the action was useful, therefore making it the ultimate good. Here, Jeremy Bentham has tried to fuse both ethical and moral theories together to show his belief that we are motivated only through pleasure and pain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work