• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Utilitarianism. Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make Utilitarianism unacceptable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Utilitarianism Question 7 A) What are the advantages of Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is principle of making decisions on the basis of promoting the greatest happiness of the greatest number of those who may be affected by the decision. There are many advantages to the principle of utilitarianism. These many evolve around the fact that this idea takes into account many different aspects of the action and decision which helps to make the decision, in a sense, fairer. One main advantage is that the principle appears to make sense to people. The principle is very simple and straight forward and can be easily followed. There is only one criterion to follow - 'the greatest happiness for the greatest number'. It explains how pleasure if for the greatest number, which to most people seams like a good outcome of a decision. Many people would find it a good goal to work towards and a good basis to make their decisions in life no matter how big the decision may actually be. As the principle is so simple and almost obvious when making some decisions Richard Jones makes the statement: "There has usually been a strong element of Utilitarianism in English moral thinking" Linked with this idea there is the idea of morality. ...read more.

Middle

If the idea was complex and not based on experience people may find it hard to understand and accept. C Brown states: "Consciously or unconsciously utilitarianism has become absorbed into the bloodstream of much modern thinking." To sum up the strengths of the principle of Utilitarianism, it is a relative approach to ethics and ethical decisions and can be applied to many different circumstances and it can be applied in many different ways. The main strength its self is the simplicity of the argument and how it can appeal to many different groups of people and in many different ways. Richard Jones in Groundwork of Christian Ethics sums up the strength of utilitarianism by saying: "The greatest strengths of Utilitarianism in practice are its plain universal and common sense style about much of its arguments, especially when being critical of established authorities such as church of state" B) Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make Utilitarianism unacceptable? One of the main weaknesses of the principle of Utilitarianism is the meaning of happiness. The main problem being finding a definition for the word 'happiness'. One definition which has been put forward is: 'state of achieving ones desire'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Morality is also about motive and intention." One major wide spread problem with utilitarianism is that it can promote people to do wrong actions, which may even be against our law, but according to a utilitarian this would be the right thing to do. Wrong things can be made to appear right to a utilitarian. Not only this but it does not take into account the actual action and intention. It only takes into account the result or consequence and this again can result in the action its self being wrong. I think these problems make utilitarianism unacceptable. The fact that you are to go against your family if it is to being happiness to people you don't even know, to me is completely wrong and goes against family loyalties which I believe are the strongest loyalties you should have. Not only this but in some circumstances this can encourage people to break the law and go against 'wrong' and 'right'. The fact that utilitarians base the decisions on the consequence but yet have no way of knowing the consequences of the action is extremely unreliable. This means that there is no certainty that there principle is the best thing to do. Hannah O'Shea-Herriot 12M ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    The hedonic calculus causes problems as if we were to apply duration of pleasure or pain it would be impossible as we all react to pain/pleasure differently. For example, if five rapists were to rape the same woman, then using the hedonic calculus, their pleasure would overweigh the woman's pain.

  2. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    However, it is not practical to impose this - most people associate power with money either subconsciously or consciously. The authority, even if chosen democratically, would want some reward for having to rule a country, and money is the usual and probably most desired reward.

  1. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    If the bird of prey didn't kill it would simply be 'the bird' and not 'the bird of prey'. As an argument that there is a problem with the construction of language this certainly seems a strong one, however Nietzsche attempts to apply this to human morality.

  2. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    After all, God is supposed to be omnipotent. Augustine`s theodicy contains the key idea of collective responsibility: all people in the world subsequent to Adam and Eve are as guilty for the original sin they committed and have inherited it as part of their nature. God is a just God and so continues to punish people for this disobedience.

  1. What is the most telling objection to Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle?

    A unanimous decision from competent judges would deem actions morally right! Majority opinion, even among the most educated, cannot, make a particular action morally right any more than it can make a scientific theory empirically true. The fact that that the majority of citizens in ancient Rome approved of slavery does not justify their having slaves.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    The herd are not in control of their lives, for they live by a set of principles that are not their own. Christianity as a form of tyranny takes over the individual. We self mutilate when we feel guilty. Nietzsche says we shouldn't feel guilty, as its better to do

  1. Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the ...

    moral choice every time, especially as we may not have all the information required by the hedonic calculus or the simply the time and encourages quite extreme results. If taken literally, all leisure activity would end, as the money spent on that activity could cause more people a greater, higher quality pleasure if given to charity, or to a beggar.

  2. There are many arguments for and against Utilitarianism and whether it provides an adequate ...

    Along with these problems, there are many arguments for and against Utilitarianism and whether it provides an adequate basis for making moral decisions. An argument against Utilitarianism is that there is no agreement about what is the 'good' that is to be maximized for all concerned in different situations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work