• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Utilitarianism practice paper essay plan.

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Utilitarianism test 5th May Plan * Explain theory ? teleological, Bentham, hedonistic, act utilitarianism, Mill ? lower and higher pleasures, weak and strong rule, preference utilitarianism. * Weakness ? felicific calculus too complicated, emotions are subjective, may allow murder if it is creates enough pleasure to the majority, people are bias, Utilitarianism is a teleological theory that is consequentialist and relativist. It evaluates whether an action is morally good if it benefits the majority. Jeremy Bentham is the founder of utilitarianism. He put forward act utilitarianism, which tries to achieve universal hedonism. This means that it tries to create enough happiness for everyone. Utilitarianism is also egalitarian, meaning that everyone is treated as equals. Bentham said that humans are ?governed by two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure?. Therefore, an action is deemed morally good if it produces the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people, this is the foundation of Act Utilitarianism. Furthermore, another principle of utilitarianism is that it is anti-legalistic; you are entitled to change the laws if you are trying to create the maximum amount of pleasure. ...read more.


Mill also said not all pleasures are the same, and so he suggested that there should be higher and lower pleasures. Higher pleasures would be intellectual ones such as opera, whereas lower pleasures would consist of watching non-educational television. As Mill said, ?It is better to be a human satisfied then a pig satisfied.? Mill also put forward the harm principle, this states that you are allowed to try and achieve pleasure, as long as it doesn?t harm those around you. Utilitarianism has continued to develop throughout time, for instance Singer created preference utilitarianism, where the preferences of others must be considered. Hare was also in support of this. There are many reasons why Utilitarianism may be considered a failure. The felicific calculus requires the ability to predict the future, which no one can achieve. It is also too complicated for many people, therefore they may abandon their quest to use act utilitarianism because they do not understand the method. ...read more.


However, Utilitarianism does allow people to evaluate their actions because it is consequentialist. This could be considered a strength, along with the fact that it is not deontological. On the other hand, the theory allows actions that may go against the law, like murder and rape, if it produces enough happiness for one person. No one can measure emotions and predict the future; therefore you cannot look at the full extent of the consequences for an action, which means you cannot use the theory accurately. To conclude, I do not believe that Utilitarianism is a successful ethical theory. Although it has some advantages, like giving people the opportunity to examine the possible consequences of their actions, no one can predict the future. Moreover, the main foundation of the theory is imprecise. It is idealist to try and create the greatest amount of pleasure for the greatest amount of people, however the reason why it has never been achieved is because emotions are too subjective and no one can measure the extent of them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the ...

    It is a commonsense system that's practically applicable to real-life situations, it has no need for a special wisdom. However, there are a number of difficulties with utilitarianism. This first difficulty concerns all teleological theories, ones that real on the consequences for deciding which actions are good.

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    He believed it to be the ultimate denial of life, a complete denial of the will and therefore life itself. He writes that those who were so weak that there was absolutely no one upon whom they could exercise their human instinct to inflict cruelty, as a last resort turned

  1. Leaving home - a corrected essay.

    the beginning of this argument, it'll help the reader understand ur argument better) An important point to note is that those who leave home do not necessarily disobey the state, but rather the state has disobeyed them. As one's right to feel safe is taken away, the insecurity drives the citizen away from his or her own land.

  2. Utilitarianism. Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make ...

    The other problem with this is the fact that desires can change or be altered and manipulated. Mills says that when referring to higher and lower pleasure we should naturally choice the higher pleasure as this is what we have been taught throughout our lives.

  1. swinburne essay

    challenge doesn't get very far as he may have been or me may not, we can't find out for ourselves we just have accept what person making the claim is saying. These last two criticisms would therefore also appear to be overcome and Swinburne's argument who seem to be succeeding.

  2. Discuss the usefulness of studying philiosophy.

    In this essay I will attempt to demonstrate the practicality, usefulness, and relevance of Philosophy in our daily lives, and to show the dramatic impact it has had on the way I view things now. Firstly, let us define the term 'Philosophy'.

  1. Sartre is a very strong proponent of strong determinism, that is, he does not ...

    wouldn't have to bother with studying physics, chemistry or biology at all. These hard sciences are a strict guide for what will occur in the universe, and any physical act not explainable by our current science is only so because of a lack of knowledge on our part.

  2. Why are justice and integrity problematic for utilitarianism?

    This seems a contradiction in terms. It is for this reason, therefore, which I believe that utilitarianism cannot be considered a realistic principle of morality, when faced with individual integrity and the use of individual experience during the decision making process.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work