• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the twentieth century. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the twentieth century. Discuss. Utilitarianism is a moral theory devised by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, which can be best summed up by the phrase "the greatest happiness for the greatest number." According to utilitarianism, in its various forms, there is no ultimate or absolute goodness, but the best thing to do in a situation is to find a course of action that will lead to the greatest happiness to the greatest number. This is very much a teleological theory, as it involves predicting the consequences and looking for the final outcome. For teleological theories (from the Greek word 'telos' meaning end) to work there needs to be someway of measuring how good or bad a consequence is. Utilitarianism is a theory which answers these questions. However, in terms of its linguistic origins it may be more aptly described as a 'theory of usefulness', after the Latin word 'utilis' meaning useful, which some may accept as true, however, if taken literally, it forms a ridiculous system of ethics. In order to weigh up the pain and pleasure generated by available moral actions to find the best opinion, the hedonic calculus, produced by Benthem (1789, Chapter IV, II) is used. It considers seven factors, which are, the intensity of the pleasure, the duration, its certainty or uncertainty, its propinquity or remoteness, its fecundity (or the chance it has if ...read more.

Middle

Bentham maintained that human beings were motivated by pleasure and pain, somebody with this view can be called a hedonist ('hedone' is Greek for pleasure). He said, "Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do" -Chapter I, I Bentham believed that all human beings pursued pleasure and sought to avoid pain. He this moral fact, as pleasure and pain identified what we should and shouldn't do. Bentham believed pleasure was the sole good and pain was sole evil, making him a hedonist. Once Bentham had established that pleasure and pain wee the important qualities for determining what was moral, he developed the utility principle. This basically states that the rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by its 'utility' or usefulness. Usefulness refers to the amount pleasure of happiness caused by the action. "By the principle of utility is meant that principle which approves or disapproves of every action whatsoever, according to the tendency which it appears to have to augment or diminish the happiness of the party whose interest is in question." This can be shortened to "An action is right is it produces the greatest good for the greatest number." The end that Bentham's theory identifies are those with the most pleasure and least pain. ...read more.

Conclusion

He also identifies the focus on happiness as the cause of the problem. Utilitarianism fails to consider different views on what happiness is. It asserts that there's a common agreement about what brings pleasure and what brings pain. This can be challenged on many levels. Not only do people have different tasted with regards to art, must and literature, but there are even extreme exceptions with regard to physical sensations, for example, there are people who find pleasure in experiencing pain. Therefore, if human beings don't have the same idea of what gives them pleasure and pain, then the premise on which utilitarianism is built severely weakened. A contemporary adherent is Peter Singer, an extreme utilitarian who has done a huge amount of work for animal rights. He argues in 'Practical Ethics' (1993) for a modified view of utilitarianism. He suggests that our ethical decisions should benefit the best interests f those affected, rather than simple pleasure, and that no individuals' interests can be considered more valuable than another's. Many people disagree with Peter Singer because of his severe view and unfortunately this has been the basis on which preconceptions of what utilitarianism is today. Although it provides a persuasive ethical theory, the people of the twenty first century will soon discover that once put into practise, the theory has major faults which, in the society today, are too great to be ignored, therefore not only making utilitarianism an unfair system of ethics but, if taken too literally, a destructive one. Char Ayoub ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how moral decisions should be made according to: Act and Rule utilitarianism

    3 star(s)

    So a person can commit murder if it causes the greatest happiness. The benefits of act utilitarianism are that its democratic view, it takes account of the majority of people rather than individuals.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Situation ethics

    3 star(s)

    Fourth, "only ends justify the means, nothing else." Fletchers feelings about love is Agape love, meaning unconditional and nothing is required in return. Fifth, "love wills the neighbor's good, whether we like him or not." this means to use things as a means to an end, not as an end itself.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how Benthams version of Utilitarianism can be used to decide the best course ...

    3 star(s)

    comes down to the 'greatest number' part of the 'greatest happiness' principle, but if, for example, there were only 2 rapists, as opposed to a possible 5 or 6, we can assume that the enormous amount of unhappiness and pain to be had by the victim would outweigh the relatively short-lived happiness or pleasure to be had by the rapists.

  2. What is the most telling objection to Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle?

    Utilitarianism in its purest form is incredibly demanding. It is almost impossible to fully obey Mills doctrine. Utilitarianism and its application is almost too high for humanity. According to Mill only actions that increase the general happiness are morally right.

  1. What are the principles of natural law? Every adult has the right to become ...

    If the bad effect is used to obtain the good consequences, then the act is immoral. Furthermore, the bad effect may be foreseen, but not intended. Finally, (4) the Proportionality condition asserts that the good effect must be at least equivalent in importance to the bad effect.

  2. Utilitarianism. Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make ...

    The principle of Utilitarianism emphasises that we should not be selfish and we should be impartial about others in order to make the correct and best decision in a certain situation. It takes into account the interests of all the other people which are either directly involved or could be affected by the consequences of the action or decision.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    'Freedom for the pike is death for the minnows'; the liberty of some must depend on the restraint of others. In this type of society some people are held back for the betterment of others. The idea that for every person on top there must be someone below them must be accepted.

  2. UTILITARIANISM In this paper I will be discussing utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the theory ...

    Just because the sadistic voyeur thinks its right, it is not morally right. Bentham's principle states as long as you gaining pleasure then there should not be any pain involved. He is saying that it may be right to open the curtain today but wrong tomorrow.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work