• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Virtue Ethics is of little use when applied to environmental issues

Extracts from this document...


Virtue Ethics is of little use when applied to environmental issues The issues that are raised when discussing the protection of the environment, usually focuses on human activity, and the destruction of habitats such as the rainforest or marine environments. Therefore, the cause for concern is how humans ought to act towards the environment in which they live in. Virtue Ethics as opposed to normative ethics is an agent-centred theory which focuses on developing and cultivating ones virtues in order to reach happiness. There seems to be no direct link to issues concerning the environment; however if you ask yourself whether a virtuous person would damage the environment, there does appear to be a strong argument how virtue ethics is of use when applied to environmental issues. Aristotle argued the theory of virtues, using a teleological twist. He explains how we all aspire to become virtuous people in which a eudaimonia is the supreme good. This approach moves away from the ideas of normative theories such utilitarianism or natural law where responsibility to the environment is based upon duties or upon consequences. ...read more.


In the case of the environment Aristotle's vices can be applied. For example a complete neclect of the environment around you is a vice of deficiency; too much care for the environment that blinds you from reaching eudaimonia can be a vice of excess. Furthermore, Aquinas states that 'What you do is what you are' which suggests that your actions determine what kind of a person you are. This statement from Aquinas can be applied to environmental issues in the sense that caring and looking after the environment makes you a virtuous person. Virtue ethics also encourages virtues to be acquired by aspiring to virtuous people and modelling their virtuous behaviour. People such as St Francis of Assisi, who is known as the patron saint of animals and the environment, can be used as role modals to people in order to cultivate and develop their own virtues of compassion on environmental issues. Anscombe also contributes to argument. She explains how the way forward was 'human flourishing.' ...read more.


In addition he explains how normative ethics has distanced itself from real people and real issues by debating fine legalistic points which they will never agree on. Virtue Ethics asks a much more important question - what sort of person should I be? This question may have different answers depending where and when it is asked, but it gives real direction and purpose to people especially on environmental issues. Further thinkers such as Nussbaum argue that are absolutes; however it is virtues that have value, not rules. Nussbaum argues that we should strive to virtues not rules; therefore virtues are what we should consider when discussing environmental issues. In conclusion, it is evident that virtue ethics does respond confidently to these criticisms by drawing attention to the failings of deontological theories and 'consequentialist' positions. Virtue ethics is a reliable alternative to normative ethics; however its failure to give a clear set of guidelines related to environmental issues is possibly its biggest weakness. With this aside, the evidence presented does suggest virtue ethics to be of use when applied to environmental issues. ?? ?? ?? ?? Liam Taylor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Utilitarianism VS Kantian Deontological Ethics

    Utilitarianism would attempt to maximise pleasure (and minimise suffering) in this situation as in any. Lying to your mother would be the best option if she weren't to find out that you were in fact not ill. This would be the best option, because it would create no suffering aside from you having to catch up tomorrow, and the repercussions that that has.

  2. Virtue ethics is of little use when dealing with practical ethics Discuss.

    Eg courage is the mean, between the tow vices coward and foolhardy. Aristotle said the mean is not the same for everyone and depends on circumstance and therefore you need to apply practical wisdom. Some people would disagree with Aristotle's golden mean; they say that virtue ethics seems to praise

  1. Religious Ethics are not the best approach to environmental ethics'. Discuss.

    the measure of extent or duration of happiness but instead on the satisfaction of desires or preferences. Singer measures the importance of an individual or being, not on their possession of a soul or reason, but on their ability to suffer.

  2. Discuss some of the issues raised in Meta-Ethics. How convincing is the view that, ...

    She ought to be offered an abortion. 'A' is the 'is' statement, 'B' is the 'ought' statement; yet, to move from one to the other, Moore claimed that an intermediate (or, midway) proposition is needed. This could be as follows: 'A woman should only carry a child to full term when she has chosen to be pregnant.'

  1. Business Ethics

    behave ethical but to compel people not to behave in a way which are legally unethical. There are numbers of issues that are not enforced by the law occurred in the market and practiced by some marketers. Marketing research is meant to analyze and identify the needs and wants of consumers.

  2. "Environmental policy can't be based solely on efficiency arguments. Issues of ethics are at ...

    Valdimir Odoevsky, "one of the most brilliant and influential representatives of progressive thought [in Russia]" (A. Frolova 1998) of his time, produced a development of the utilitarian theory of J. Bentham, which is illustrated in Alla Frolova's article 'Ecological reasoning: Ethical alternatives'.

  1. Examine the key features of Virtue Ethics

    Robert Louden has argued that virtue ethics cannot resolve moral dilemmas. He stated that as virtue ethics is focused on the individual, it neither resolves nor attempts to resolve big moral dilemmas. It may help make the moral agent virtuous but it does not give any answers relating to an ethical crisis.

  2. Explain the theory of Virtue Ethics

    like a fool, but at the same time we must also not pass into rudeness. Two philosophers, Anscombe and MacIntyre say that there has been a mistake in how virtues have been portrayed. The majority of people look at the actions a person does to judge whether they are virtuous or not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work