• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

We are free to make ethical decisions, discuss

Extracts from this document...


Fern Chambers We are free to make ethical decisions, discuss In this essay I aim to assess whether or not we are to make ethical decisions or if we have are predetermined and so therefore are not morally responsible for our actions. Hard Determinism states that everything in the universe, including our actions and choices, are predetermined, so meaning that everything that happens and has happened in our lives has already been chosen. With our increasing ability from subjects such as psychology, to explain human feelings and emotions, people have grown to believe that we, like everything else in the world, act in accordance laws. Hard determinism says that we are all a product of our genes, upbringing and surroundings. Hard determinism says that we are all a product of our genes, upbringing and surroundings. It is created from these things, so may be our actions and decisions. Locke gave the example of a man who wakes up in a room that, unknown to him, is locked from the outside. ...read more.


Did we not have a choice, then the idea of a mind and options would be meaningless and pointless. For example, a kleptomaniac may be inclined to steal, but they have a free choice in whether or not they choose to do so, they can choose to be influenced or not. Peter van inwaged uses the analogy of choosing which branch to go down when travelling a long a road. Libratarianism recognises that people experience making decisions; they experience freedom and have control over decisions in their life. Evidence of this is our society which is based on people having responsibility for their actions, for example, in law, a person can punished for a decision which they have made . We analyse our actions and ask if we did the right thing after acting - we could only do that if we had a choice. Heisenberg is found in modern physics and puts forward an uncertainty principle. The Uncertainty Principle states that we cannot know the location of particles in space, the same way events can be uncaused and human decisions can be uncaused. ...read more.


When we act we always think of ourselves as free. Kant says that freedom is a postulate of practical reason. It can be viewed that because some things can be proved to have been caused because of science, then we ourselves must have been cause.Soft determinism may be seen as the view that determinism is compatible with whatever sort of freedom is necessary for moral responsibility, when applied to science, such as physics, some events are not determined or random meaning that science cannot completely explain our world. In conclusion i think that we are free to make ethical decisions because although we can be swayed by other influences such as culture, family or friends. We have the decision to choose what we like. Did we not have a choice, there would be no options, and we would have no need for a mind. A person that has a gene which makes them likely to steal still has a choice, they may be inclined to do so but have the choice whether or not too. Therefore i believe we are free to make ethical decisions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Religious Language cannot be proved, therefore it is meaningless

    Saint Thomas Aquinas argued that we only have our day to day language which we can use to talk about God. We understand when a word is applied to God; it has a different meaning from its everyday use as we understand God is perfect. Therefore we are using analogies.

  2. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    Socio-economic, religio-cultural backgrounds and experience of life may affect us in such a way that our behaviour is determined rather than free. Thus, if everything is predetermined does that mean we are left without any moral responsibility and give the murderer free scope to kill his victim without suffering any consequences?

  1. Consider the view that humans have no free will.

    was a philosopher during the late 19th century but he's unrelated to the topic), the victim was a 14-year old boy called Robert "Bobby" Franks who was kidnapped and then murdered. Loeb's family hired 67-year old Clarence Darrow, a well-known opponent of capital punishment, to defend the men against the capital charges of murder and kidnapping.

  2. God Knows the ethical decisions we will make. Discuss

    Although by giving us free will to make our own decisions we being to question god's omniscience. If we have free will can god see our actions before we do them and if so we really have free will or are our actions predetermined by god's foreknowledge.

  1. Discuss the view that few business make truly moral decisions and that most implement ...

    If decisions are undertaken on a truly moral stance then these benefits don't factor and neither should any negatives that may arise from the policy. After all, the moral path is the 'right' path regardless of outcome. The drawbacks of moral policies to a business may include increased costs across the board and a decline in profits.

  2. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    the question: Just because it can be done, should it be done? There does not seem to be a clear-cut answer. In terms of benefits to humans, clones could provide children for those who cannot have one of their own, or assistance as donors for a genetic twin who has a life threatening disease.

  1. Free essay

    Hard Determinism Negates Free Will, Discuss

    This theory is supported by key thinkers such as Hume, who argued how moral responsibility requires determinism. The soft determinism approach appears to be a reliable theory that suggests that hard determinism does not negate free will. The strengths are that it allows free will and determinism to be compatible,

  2. Assess the claim that Free Will and Determinism are compatible

    He refuted the idea of the will being intrinsically free, instead suggesting the 'tabula rasa' - the mind as a blank slate which is filled by life experiences that create each person's moral framework. We as human beings develop morality during our lives.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work