• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the advantages of utilitarianism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the advantages of utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is defined as the greatest good for the greatest number with pain over pleasure, this is important because otherwise it would be okay to torture convicted criminals just to get answers about other criminals, which is bad because you initially causing a person pain and that is immoral which is bad. Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory of morality and "how one should act". It states that one should act so as to maximize the amount of happiness in the world meaning focusing on the consequences of ones actions. The strengths of utilitarianism is that the theory is a better than many other theories when it comes to dealing with challenging moral dilemmas, cases in which it seems that, no matter how you choose to act, you risk failing to perform a basic human duty you have. Utilitarianism has the apparent advantage that it includes in its compass not only rational, i.e. human beings, but all things, which can experience pain and pleasure. So, animals are not left out by utilitarian ethicists and cruelty toward animals can be consistently condemned. ...read more.

Middle

Another main strength Is that its democratic and is practical it has not got loads of confusing theories of why utilitarianism is what it is, its easy to follow and understand. Utilitarianism can be used by organizations not just individuals this is another strength because if a hospital or any other organization needed to make a decision on what is best they could refer to utilitarianism and see that its about pleasing the majority not the minority. A quote by Jeremy Bentham can refer to this he said ''greatest good by the greatest number'' it's better to help the greatest number of people than the least. However there are some problems with utilitarianism, like how can we be sure of the consequences at the end of each action or situation, how can we actually measure please or pain? Some people may that pain is good for us, there are also different view about what happiness is. There are problems for utilitarianism others may say that it is too simplistic. Identify the main problems with utilitarianism. To what extent do those make utilitarianism unacceptable? ...read more.

Conclusion

Other criticisms towards utilitarianism is there's no credit to motivation, the argument is too simplistic, its understandable but its not as straight forward in real life, things cant be right one day and not the next, it has difficulty of not being ''agent relative'' a person making decisions in a group and not focusing on an individual. Kant says 'people should always be treated as ends in themselves' Overall utilitarianism is not helpful, just by making the majority happy, still leaves a minority unhappy, and surely this cant be right, we should try and please everyone, to help the greatest numbers isn't the greatest good because there is always a conscience about the minority who have to suffer to be unhappy, for example if a teacher in class asked how the pupils concentrated more by sitting in row are groups and if the majority of pupils said in rows the teacher would take that into consideration but there would still be other unhappy, surely you should try and make everyone happy the way the teacher could have was to sit people in rows and people in groups to suit everybody's needs? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. What are the advantages of Utilitarianism?

    Mill stated that higher pleasures were a lot more valuable than the basic ones that Bentham refers to. Thomas Carlyle accuses Bentham of referring to one 'swinish pleasures' and therefore it was a pig philosophy. 'It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to

  2. Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the ...

    individuals are free to pursue their own ends, subject to rules that protect the common good of all. While Mill accepted the utility principle of the greatest good for the greatest number, he was concerned about scandals such as slavery could be justified.

  1. Philosophy - Conscience (90/90)

    Yet, one might ask the fundamental question of whether the conscience is worthy of its place above appetites and affections. The empiricist, David Hume, makes his opinion on the matter quite clear: "reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them"12.

  2. Utilitarianism. Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make ...

    This idea of unselfishness may already be deemed to be morally right by most people which relates back to my previous strength of the principle. Utilitarianism appears to be very flexible in that there are no laws, principle, or institution which controls the principle.

  1. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    the way our society functions it is surprising how easy it is to fit it into a model Nietzschian society. Whilst we, the 'dumb masses', congratulate ourselves on creating such a free and liberal society, in reality it is Nietzsche's privileged aristocracy that are making the decisions.

  2. Assess Utilitarianism

    Is there a single sensation known as 'pleasure'? Are they just not sensations which we enjoy, but of which none are the same? Aristotle made this point, suggesting that "pain is not a single sensation", which would completely flatten this theory. Finally, how do we know what consequences are actually relevant to the morality of an act?

  1. Why are justice and integrity problematic for utilitarianism?

    The visitor does not actually do this to enhance overall happiness of the patient, but because he feels a sense of duty to do so. Therefore, Stocker argues, that actions may be done for reasons other than for the purpose of aggregate happiness.

  2. What makes a person valuable?

    way or an experience later in life may have caused this, therefore they shouldn?t be considered less of a person as their moral consciousness had been altered from a disability or suffering they are battling without it really being their choice.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work