• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the moral and religious differences, if any, between euthanasia and suicide? Why may these distinctions be important?

Extracts from this document...


What are the moral and religious differences, if any, between euthanasia and suicide? Why may these distinctions be important? The ethical question still remains 'Can it ever be right to kill, even with the intension to relieve suffering?' In general euthanasia means good death. It has become almost exclusively applied to the deliberate ending of life, with the desire to avoid necessary pain by a doctor who thinks that death is of benefit to the patient. Suicide is self-destruction, it is the direct and deliberate taking of one's own life. It is possible that there are moral and religious differences between them, and if so are they really important?, a theory I propose to examine. There are various attitudes toward euthanasia and suicide which have changed over the years in both society and religion. Religiously, the traditional Roman Catholic Church is pro-life; it does not accept either euthanasia or suicide absolutely. This is because it follows the Ten Commandments ' Thou shall not murder'1 and considers suicide and euthanasia as a grave and mortal sin. The chief Christian argument is that one's life is the property of God, and to destroy that life is to wrongly assert dominion over what is God's, therefore euthanasia and suicide is always wrong and cannot be justified in any circumstances. The modern Protestant is pro-choice, they see euthanasia as the 'lesser of two evils' and so it should be judge on its merit. In other words, neither option is ideal, but euthanasia might be a better option than going through the unnecessary suffering and pain. Situation ethics which proclaimed by Fletcher2 can be applied. He states that decision-making should be based upon the circumstances of a particular situation, and not upon fixed Law. The only absolute is Love (Agape Love). ...read more.


The avoidance of pain is generally the main motive of euthanasia and suicide, typically physical pain in euthanasia and mental pain in suicide. More youngsters are committing suicide, with the recent news in Bridgend and surrounding area. Between Jane 2, 2007 and February 15, 2008 sixteen young people aged 15 to 27 had committed a suicide with unknown reasons. Police maintained that there was 'no evidence' that any of the deaths were linked. However, that the town was at the centre of a suicide 'cluster' appeared undeniable.13 Some people believe that young people have encouraged each other on social networking website. Most victims were members of the Bebo and Facebook, nevertheless no evidence emerged that they had all been encouraged commit suicide on the internet. Internet networking sites are said to be creating a 'cult of immortality'14 and among young people with the current news on the 'predators telling children how to kill themselves on the internet'15 and the deaths of young people in Bridgend. Although the reasons for young people to committee a suicide are debatable, nonetheless from either the religious or moral point of view none of the deaths are acceptable. This is because life should not be taken 'randomly' with no reason, as life is sacred. Perhaps the moral issue here lies within society. Teenagers are easily influenced and so could be taken in by internet chat rooms. Could it be that the 'traditional family' set up is so changed that teenagers prefer to talk to a machine rather than their parents. A really desperate youngster would do better to talk to the Samaritans rather than Facebook, but is this just a question of choice or lack of guidance? ...read more.


Besides if God is a forgiving God as we are told, in the Bible it says "Take courage my son, your sins are forgiven."27, a believer may still find a place with God in the after life. People should be caution in making any moral judgement about anyone so predisposed as to want to take their own lives that does not even affect you. This is because it is difficult to know what is actually morally right or wrong and morals cannot be derived from nature as David Hume 28 has suggested. Euthanasia and suicide are based upon moral and religious beliefs that are sometimes impossible to be logical about as, these arguments are related to cultural values and practise. But, they can change over time, so some practices that were considered barbaric before, are now accept. It has become more difficult to set out moral principles to guide people in the position or right direction (more active Samaritans) because much of society struggles to find its 'moral compass' Although the 'dominance' of the church has been criticised in the past it did create a stability effect when considering moral issues. Without this influence one might ask where such 'moral guidance' may be found (surely not on the internet). Even so society should show compassion to others even if their decisions were not morally or religiously sound. In general the moral and religious distinctions between suicide and euthanasia are not important simply because it is a very personal matter, we cannot control people's minds and actions surely that person has considered enough to come to the decision. It is their life, for certain they would not play any jokes on it, once you are dead, and there is no going back. It is easy to write the rules down, but it is extremely difficult to apply to the reality in different situations. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christianity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Christianity essays

  1. Situation ethics. Joseph Fletcher developed the idea of making a moral decision for a ...

    Positivism which means that situation Ethics depends on Christians freely choosing faith that God is love and Personalism which means the situationist puts people first, not the law. There are six fundamental principles of Situation Ethics. The first is that "love is intrinsically good, namely love, nothing else at all"2.

  2. Christian Philosophy on Death

    While it is easy to dwell on the negatives that death presents, there are other ways to approach death. Some people handle death with much grace, accepting their fate and using the time allotted to them to try to make their last days count.

  1. Compare and contrast the key features of Natural Moral Law & Virtue Ethics

    - which he calls 'internal goods' or 'goods of excellence' - rather than focusing on practice-independent obligation of a moral agent (deontological ethics) or the consequences of a particular act (utilitarianism). James F Keenan states that the previous list of virtues that exists needs expanding.

  2. Outline and Examine Jesus attitudes towards outcasts in Lukes Gospel.To what extent do these ...

    Be made clean." This shows that Jesus is willing. What is interesting to note is that when Jesus tells the leper to go show himself to the priest, he is hinting at the amount of exclusion there is at the time and that it is a major problem.

  1. Cyrano de Bergerac Act V Character List.

    Like Cyrano, he comes to the convent to visit Roxane. Although he still seems interested in her after fifteen years, he has resigned himself to the fact that he has lost her to Christian forever. De Guiche seems to have mellowed in other ways as well.

  2. Assess whether the problem of moral evil casts doubt on the existence of God

    Process theology meets Hume on his own terms by stating that God is not omnipotent, just powerful. However, this appears to be a strong contradiction to the Bible "I form the light and create darkness, I make peace and create evil, I the Lord, do all these things."

  1. To get to heaven you must behave morally. Discuss.

    For example, Dawkins, who is a firm criticiser of religion argues that there is no need to behave morally as not only does heaven not exist, but nor does any form of God. Similarly, Dawkins would also dispute the need for behaving morally to get into heaven as God does

  2. Outline theories on the immortality of the soul and ressurection of the body

    There is also the question of what happens to those who are dead and judgement day has not come, do they wait in some form of purgatory.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work