• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are they key ideas of the cosmological argument for the existence of God?

Extracts from this document...


What are they key ideas of the cosmological argument for the existence of God? (7) Does God exist? This is an ultimate question as it has no definite answer. There are many theories and ideas that attempt to prove that there is a god, and that he is the creator. The cosmological argument is no exception as it too is concerned with finding an explanation for how the universe came about. The argument is a posteriori, synthetic and inductive, this means that we do not learn any more from the conclusion than we already knew from the premises, and that the use of analytic terms means that we are using terms that have a clear and distinct meaning and cannot therefore be misinterpreted. ...read more.


There is also an Islamic form of the argument, which is known as the 'Kalam' argument. It proposes that whatever comes into being must have a cause, the universe came into being, therefore the universe must have a cause. This principle claims that if something cannot be the cause of it's own existence then it must have been caused by something else, and by something else and so forth. This chain can be said to be completed only when we arrive at a self-causing state. Thomas Aquinas proposed the most famous Christian application of the cosmological argument. He stated five ways that proved the existence of God, the first three are cosmological arguments, the fourth is a form of ontological argument and the last one is a teleological argument. ...read more.


Aquinas said that everything that exists, at one time did not, and may not at some time in the future. However, at one time none of these things existed, but because "nothing can come from nothing" there must have been something whose existence was necessary. This being must be God. In 1710, Leibniz explained the cosmological argument according to the principle of sufficient reasoning. He argued that why is there something rather than nothing? Every event must have a sufficient reason for its happening. Everything in the world requires a reason for its existence, as nothing happens without a reason. Everything in the world can be explained with relation to something else within the world. Therefore, the ultimate reason why there is something rather than nothing must come from outside the world, there must be a being able to create existence, which we call God. Sabiha Patel ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    was an empiricist. He argues it is impossible to conceive of an effect without conceiving of the cause of that effect, and he concludes that given any supposed effect E which is normally said to be caused by C, we can yet affirm E without implying that C ever existed at all.

  2. Discuss critically the use of symbol as a means of expressing ideas about God

    These are used in completely unrelated ways and if the language about God was used like this then there would be no connection between the language we use in the world and the language used about God and then the language about God would be meaningless.

  1. Explain the cosmological argument for existence of God

    here, he is saying that if we broaden the perspective of understanding from experience, we can apply it to the Universe, to find what out what created it. This supports Thomas Aquinas by using a posterior experience to suggest that the universe and world were created by G-d.

  2. The differences between the Cosmological Argument and the Teleological Argument for the existence of ...

    up, there is not a very big chance in the slightest that they would all fall down fitted into place and working properly. Therefore it must have had a designer, someone who designed, planned and made the watch. If you look at the world like the watch, and think about

  1. What are the key ideas of the design argument?

    He reinforces the idea of the World not being like something man made by talking of a house. Hume says that we know who has designed and built a house because we have seen the architect and builder do it, however we did not see the World being created and therefore cannot suggest the creator.

  2. What are the key ideas of the cosmological argument?

    Aquinas and William Lane Craig reject the infinity of regress. Because we are at today, we have added to the past, therefore the universe is potentially infinite. Aquinas rejects the possibility that causes go on forever because for there to be a future, there must be a past and so a beginning.

  1. Outline the key ideas of the design argument.

    He believes that the universe is where man was designed to occupy the highest position and that natural laws work in the universe to make it a place where man can meaningfully add to its development and maintenance. This kind of universe, the kind that God created was not just made for humans but for animals as well.

  2. Explain the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, according to Aquinas

    Darwin?s evolution theory is an example primarily of progression, humans would cease if we didn?t evolve genetically to be the fittest to survive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work