• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are they key ideas of the cosmological argument for the existence of God?

Extracts from this document...


What are they key ideas of the cosmological argument for the existence of God? (7) Does God exist? This is an ultimate question as it has no definite answer. There are many theories and ideas that attempt to prove that there is a god, and that he is the creator. The cosmological argument is no exception as it too is concerned with finding an explanation for how the universe came about. The argument is a posteriori, synthetic and inductive, this means that we do not learn any more from the conclusion than we already knew from the premises, and that the use of analytic terms means that we are using terms that have a clear and distinct meaning and cannot therefore be misinterpreted. ...read more.


There is also an Islamic form of the argument, which is known as the 'Kalam' argument. It proposes that whatever comes into being must have a cause, the universe came into being, therefore the universe must have a cause. This principle claims that if something cannot be the cause of it's own existence then it must have been caused by something else, and by something else and so forth. This chain can be said to be completed only when we arrive at a self-causing state. Thomas Aquinas proposed the most famous Christian application of the cosmological argument. He stated five ways that proved the existence of God, the first three are cosmological arguments, the fourth is a form of ontological argument and the last one is a teleological argument. ...read more.


Aquinas said that everything that exists, at one time did not, and may not at some time in the future. However, at one time none of these things existed, but because "nothing can come from nothing" there must have been something whose existence was necessary. This being must be God. In 1710, Leibniz explained the cosmological argument according to the principle of sufficient reasoning. He argued that why is there something rather than nothing? Every event must have a sufficient reason for its happening. Everything in the world requires a reason for its existence, as nothing happens without a reason. Everything in the world can be explained with relation to something else within the world. Therefore, the ultimate reason why there is something rather than nothing must come from outside the world, there must be a being able to create existence, which we call God. Sabiha Patel ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    The separation, therefore, of the idea of a cause from that of a beginning of existence, is plainly possible for the imagination; and consequently the actual separation of these objects is so far possible, that it implies no contradiction

  2. Explain the cosmological argument for existence of God

    here, he is saying that if we broaden the perspective of understanding from experience, we can apply it to the Universe, to find what out what created it. This supports Thomas Aquinas by using a posterior experience to suggest that the universe and world were created by G-d.

  1. The differences between the Cosmological Argument and the Teleological Argument for the existence of ...

    how it had a designer to make it, you can understand the Teleological Argument saying that the world is way to complex to just appear from a bang.

  2. Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

    that there is a logical jump in Paley's argument that doesn't actually have to be made. John Stuart Mill said that due to the sheer amount of evil in the universe such as disease and natural disasters, he came to the conclusion that God cant be both omnipotent and benevolent but just benevolent.

  1. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    we can conclude that a God is imperfect and limited in his powers, which is not a problem, but is such a God worthy of worship? Maurice Wiles argued not: a God who ignored the holocaust but saved one individual and a God who fed 5000 yet ignores the starving and dying in third world countries.

  2. What are the key ideas of the cosmological argument?

    Aquinas and William Lane Craig reject the infinity of regress. Because we are at today, we have added to the past, therefore the universe is potentially infinite. Aquinas rejects the possibility that causes go on forever because for there to be a future, there must be a past and so a beginning.

  1. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    He then proposes a notion that does not require a God or first mover and then reduces it to absurdity, as he goes on to say, conceive of a universe were everything was a secondary mover, which would result in an infinite regress of movers, and so if this were

  2. Outline the Ontological Argument for the existence of God.

    difficulty of atheists understand how it could be true because they do not have the assumption about a God. The argument proposes the existence is entailed in the concept of God but many people argue that conceiving God is not possible and therefore his existence to cannot be possible.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work