• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are they key ideas of the cosmological argument for the existence of God?

Extracts from this document...


What are they key ideas of the cosmological argument for the existence of God? (7) Does God exist? This is an ultimate question as it has no definite answer. There are many theories and ideas that attempt to prove that there is a god, and that he is the creator. The cosmological argument is no exception as it too is concerned with finding an explanation for how the universe came about. The argument is a posteriori, synthetic and inductive, this means that we do not learn any more from the conclusion than we already knew from the premises, and that the use of analytic terms means that we are using terms that have a clear and distinct meaning and cannot therefore be misinterpreted. ...read more.


There is also an Islamic form of the argument, which is known as the 'Kalam' argument. It proposes that whatever comes into being must have a cause, the universe came into being, therefore the universe must have a cause. This principle claims that if something cannot be the cause of it's own existence then it must have been caused by something else, and by something else and so forth. This chain can be said to be completed only when we arrive at a self-causing state. Thomas Aquinas proposed the most famous Christian application of the cosmological argument. He stated five ways that proved the existence of God, the first three are cosmological arguments, the fourth is a form of ontological argument and the last one is a teleological argument. ...read more.


Aquinas said that everything that exists, at one time did not, and may not at some time in the future. However, at one time none of these things existed, but because "nothing can come from nothing" there must have been something whose existence was necessary. This being must be God. In 1710, Leibniz explained the cosmological argument according to the principle of sufficient reasoning. He argued that why is there something rather than nothing? Every event must have a sufficient reason for its happening. Everything in the world requires a reason for its existence, as nothing happens without a reason. Everything in the world can be explained with relation to something else within the world. Therefore, the ultimate reason why there is something rather than nothing must come from outside the world, there must be a being able to create existence, which we call God. Sabiha Patel ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. The differences between the Cosmological Argument and the Teleological Argument for the existence of ...

    It does bring out some good points and shows the existence of God in a new prospective which could possible change how some people look at the world, but is not proving anything about God really existing. An Atheist could look at the Teleological Argument and may agree or disagree.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    was an empiricist. He argues it is impossible to conceive of an effect without conceiving of the cause of that effect, and he concludes that given any supposed effect E which is normally said to be caused by C, we can yet affirm E without implying that C ever existed at all.

  1. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    This does not however explain the existence of genetic disorders. If God had created evolution to run the way it does, then why would he have included terrible disease passed through generations? Unless God was, as Hume suggests, not all-loving.

  2. Explain the cosmological argument for existence of God

    This argument has the following logical structure: Everything that has a beginning of its existence has a cause of its existence.

  1. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of - The Thomist Cosmological Argument of the Existence ...

    Although the argument doesn't point to the classical theism of God; whether or not someone believes in the cosmological argument depends on the faith that they already have. The argument will appear more convincing to the theist who already believes in a God, than the atheist who does not.

  2. Outline the teleological proof of the existence of God

    Hume's second argument that Philo presents to Cleanthes is that, there is defiantly order in the universe, but order does not necessarily lead to an assumption of design. He says that the universe is probable that it was a result of chance and that matter is everlasting.

  1. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    If he were to be right then this would undermine the argument immensely. However some philosophers like Elizabeth Anscombe would argue that even if it is not the balls that cause each other to be pocketed but rather magnets, it is still impossible for us to genuinely believe that there was no cause, and Hume was being unreasonably sceptical.

  2. Explain the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, according to Aquinas

    is the cause of the effect not only in respect of becoming but also in respect of being.? Aquinas argues that the causes cannot be the same nature as its effects this is coherent in the 2nd and 3rd way too.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work