• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What does being good mean for Kant.

Extracts from this document...


(a) What does being good mean for Kant. The principles of Immanuel Kant are based on the belief that ethics stem from rules and reason much like the law of gravity, they are always universal and practical regardless of circumstances. He believed that the ability to reason was unique to man and when exercised this was what it meant to be a moral human being. His deontological method rejects Utilitarianism due to its consequentialist nature not being universal and not based on reason. Kant presents a stricter way of making moral judgements. Kant believed that an action has moral worth if it can be universalised. He proposed the test of universalisability which would show by the use of reason whether an act was right. This is his Categorical Imperative, that "I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law". ...read more.


A good will is when a person does his duty for the sake of duty alone, he does his duty because it's right, and for no other reason. At the time Kant's approach was a highly original and contemporary way of thinking. He laid out the first principles of morality which were independent of self interest and showed his belief that a good man was one that followed duty and ignored personal feelings. There were many positive aspects that appealed to people when making moral choices. (b) "Kant's theory is cold and unattractive" discuss For example you are a soldier in your war torn homeland. In battle it is your duty to kill the opponent however you knew this particular soldier before the outbreak of fighting and realise that he has a wife and children to support. The consequences of pulling the trigger are at least worth considering. The method above is called the universalisability principle and it was this that allowed Kant to differentiate between moral actions and immoral actions, it ...read more.


Inclination being a shallow personal action and obligation is more of an action of deep duty. For example I have promised my parents that I will baby-sit for them but I get invited to a party that takes place on the same evening where I would much rather spend my Saturday night. Acting as a moral person I would stay in and look after my baby brother doing my duty. I am ignoring my practical will and instead I choose my logical (commonsense) will. Kant argued that a person is only acting morally when they hold back their feelings and stick to their duty. This then raises the question why on some occasions have I gone to the party and arranged another baby sitter, does this make me completely immoral and therefore an irrational person? Utilitarian ethics would allow me to go providing I found another babysitter as then everyone would be happy. It has been suggested that Kent's approach is perhaps too demanding and insensitive to the needs of others. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    Suppose, for example, you were hiding a Jewish refugee in your home during the German occupation of Holland and a Nazi officer knocked at your door and demanded to know the number and nationality of all the occupants in your house.

  2. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    If euthanasia were good, it should be the duty of everyone, at least everyone in that situation. But euthanasia can not be a universal duty, and therefore, it can not be a good duty, and therefore, lacks moral value. Kant says that actions should be based on what is good.

  1. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    wrong', we are simply saying 'I personally do not believe in torturing children'. We cannot actually judge whether the act is right or wrong, we can only give our personal opinion or preference. Ayer's claim that moral language simply conveys our beliefs and opinion was further developed by another logical positivist, C.L Stevenson (1908- )

  2. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    And this identity stands with other identities. If one will not treat his humanity as normative, he will have no basis to act at all. Based on her discussion, Korsgaard portrayed moral principles as constitutive of and essential to the making of human choices and in leading a human life.

  1. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    and rationality, while the negative approach requires that a life simply lack certain negative features to be worth living, such as extreme pain, hopeless deterioration, and irreversible incapacity to give or withhold consent. The positions can be combined to hold that a life is worth living only if certain positive features are present and certain negative features absent.

  2. Moral Consequences and Choices.

    do not steal. A teleologist would consider an action to be good as long as the consequences of the action were of a pleasing nature. Even if the intention of the action is considered to be evil, but the action inadvertently produces consequences that are pleasing, the action is then considered to be good e.g.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work