• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What does being good mean for Kant.

Extracts from this document...


(a) What does being good mean for Kant. The principles of Immanuel Kant are based on the belief that ethics stem from rules and reason much like the law of gravity, they are always universal and practical regardless of circumstances. He believed that the ability to reason was unique to man and when exercised this was what it meant to be a moral human being. His deontological method rejects Utilitarianism due to its consequentialist nature not being universal and not based on reason. Kant presents a stricter way of making moral judgements. Kant believed that an action has moral worth if it can be universalised. He proposed the test of universalisability which would show by the use of reason whether an act was right. This is his Categorical Imperative, that "I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law". ...read more.


A good will is when a person does his duty for the sake of duty alone, he does his duty because it's right, and for no other reason. At the time Kant's approach was a highly original and contemporary way of thinking. He laid out the first principles of morality which were independent of self interest and showed his belief that a good man was one that followed duty and ignored personal feelings. There were many positive aspects that appealed to people when making moral choices. (b) "Kant's theory is cold and unattractive" discuss For example you are a soldier in your war torn homeland. In battle it is your duty to kill the opponent however you knew this particular soldier before the outbreak of fighting and realise that he has a wife and children to support. The consequences of pulling the trigger are at least worth considering. The method above is called the universalisability principle and it was this that allowed Kant to differentiate between moral actions and immoral actions, it ...read more.


Inclination being a shallow personal action and obligation is more of an action of deep duty. For example I have promised my parents that I will baby-sit for them but I get invited to a party that takes place on the same evening where I would much rather spend my Saturday night. Acting as a moral person I would stay in and look after my baby brother doing my duty. I am ignoring my practical will and instead I choose my logical (commonsense) will. Kant argued that a person is only acting morally when they hold back their feelings and stick to their duty. This then raises the question why on some occasions have I gone to the party and arranged another baby sitter, does this make me completely immoral and therefore an irrational person? Utilitarian ethics would allow me to go providing I found another babysitter as then everyone would be happy. It has been suggested that Kent's approach is perhaps too demanding and insensitive to the needs of others. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    Egoistic actions, such as kill oneself due to suffering or poor quality of life, goes against benevolence. Kant would be against euthanasia in terms that it cannot be universalised, saying that everyone in suffering should take the option of death.

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    Human behaviour needs to have such complicated complications and diversities taken into the account, and this is something which emotivism fails to do. Another main criticism of emotivism is as follows: If all conduct and action is simply a matter of expressing our psychological response to an event or situation,

  1. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    This is clear to see. If these two negative maxims - do not bother to tell the truth or to keep a promise - were to be universalised, then truth-telling and promise-keeping would soon fall into disuse. No one would believe anyone.

  2. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    identity and extending such obligation to other living things is a good insight that pushes and calls for special discussions of normativity. How does social or practical identity differ from moral identity? Do you think that moral identity is tenable?

  1. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    We might not resuscitate even if we had a surplus of time, space, money, personnel, and equipment. The concept of a life not worth living is central to the QL position. When there is competition for scarce resources, the central notion becomes that of a life less worth living than

  2. Does the "War on Terror" mean the just war doctrine is dead?

    Preventive war is when another nation could potentially be a danger to our nation, and a decision is made to strike them first in fear of potentially being attacked. The main justification by Bush administration in its pursuit of a just cause has insisted that Saddam Hussein has for a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work