• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What guidance might utilitarianism offer to questions relating to genetic engineering?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐What guidance might utilitarianism offer to questions relating to genetic engineering? The main principle of a utilitarianism is ? the greatest good for the greatest number? Genetic Engineering involves embryo research, selecting human genes, genetically engineering crops, alteration to human genes, stem cell research and much more. According to the utilitarian view, this should be assessed on the basis of its consequences. For a utilitarian, something is beneficial to the extent that it adds to enhancing the quality of human and animal life, and is harmful to the extent that is causes disease, or suffering in any form. Utilitarianism does not accept the principle that human life has absolute value and this should be upheld by whatever the consequences, but it attempts to look at each individual situation to promote the greatest happiness for those concerned. ...read more.


Also, individual talents like sporting talents or mathematical ability can be enhance. In response to utilitarianisms, they would say that the long-term consequences would be that more people would benefit from such research thus the principle of the greatest good for the greatest number is met. Bentham?s hedonic calculus can only be applied to those who suffer. Early embryos, it is assumes at this present stage; do not have the capacity to feel pain and so cannot be measured according to the hedonic calculus. However, the benefits of genetic engineering and embryo research are justifiable using the hedonic calculus. For example the pleasures brought about such as cures for diseases like Parkinson?s. Therefore it is possible to say, from a utilitarian point of view that it is better save many lives in the future by embryo research at the cost of a few embryos now. ...read more.


Therefore the cost and success rates is out weighed by the amount of pleasure. When considering stem cell research and genetically engineering crops, utilitarian?s would generally support these actions, as the majority would benefit from this research in the long term. For example, for those people who like to eat strawberries- who would protest against enhanced strawberries of the size of an apple. Without any other extraneous variables happening, no one would be at a disadvantage if they enhanced our foods. However, we should consider a number of problems with this. One of them being, causing disruption to the environment through cross-pollution. This could potentially cause harm to humans by causing allergic reactions or development of new diseases, thus the harm it creates is out weighed by its potential benefits. Additionally this could also lead to exploitation of the developing countries. Therefore it may bring less good about than it not existing before hand. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Examine the key features of utilitarianism and its strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    The theory relies on a single principle by which we make moral decisions. However, we cannot solve every dilemma by reference to one ethical theory because every dilemma is unique in some way.

  2. Utilitarianism. Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make Utilitarianism ...

    Act Utilitarianism does not take into account any of the moral issues associated with the action. Each action is assessed on the consequence alone, so for example they feel it is acceptable to lie if it would be for the greatest good of the other people, however they do not consider the moral reasons behind the importance of not lying.

  1. Outline the main features of Utilitarianism andExamine critically criticisms that have been offered against ...

    The Utilitarian using this calculus would save the doctor first as they have the cure for cancer and this can bring long duration, propinquity, intensity and extent. Many people could survive from this new cure for cancer so this doctor could bring the greatest good for the greatest number.

  2. Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make Utilitarianism unacceptable? ...

    The whole principal is concerned with the product, the end result being maximum possible utility and thus happiness. An advantage of utilitarianism is therefore visible as it is an ethic which aims for moral consequences, it quotes 'an action is only right if it brings about pleasure or prevents pain'.

  1. Business environment

    The implied role of this board member is to monitor and mediate conflicts between profits and ethics. Although the article provides a new approach to ethical problem solving, some basic problems remain. The concept of ethics is not adequately developed and he fails to discuss implementation of his solution.

  2. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    While these will not be elaborated here, they will be discussed further in Section 3 as strategies by which SL may respond to objections. For now we simply pose this question: can SL use any of these two-tiered equality conditions without thereby becoming a QL position?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work