• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is authority?

Extracts from this document...


AUTHORITY Main question: What is authority? (Is authority simply power?) Further questions: Does authority limit liberty? Is authority necessary in any society? Examples of types of authority: - State authority (totalitarian regime, democracy, etc.) - Institutional authority (Club Secretary, committee chairman, ranks within army, etc.) - Charismatic authority (Jesus, Gandhi, Mr. Moon, etc.) - The authority of an expert (a vulcanologist, horticulturalist, pest control expert, etc.) - Parental authority - Papal authority - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Authority = Power Arguments for: (i) We speak of the "State Authorities" even in nations governed by military dictatorships or totalitarian regimes, which have no apparent moral or political justification. The authority involved in such cases seems to be nothing other than brute power. (ii) When anyone exercises authority they are by some means getting someone else to do something, which is precisely what exercising power amounts to. ...read more.


Reply: If this is ever so, surely such a person is not really an authority? A mouthpiece is no more than a passive instrument. Usually the charismatic figure is exercising some influence over their followers, rather than just reflecting what is already there. (vi) Winch argued that authority is simply freely accepting some external constraint upon one's behaviour, and that this is involved in any meaningful human action. To be meaningful, any action must be rule-governed. A rule is an external standard of correctness/incorrectness. Any free choice involves the assumption of a correct/incorrect decision, and there is no relevant difference between accepting the authority of a rule and accepting the authority of a person. Reply: a rule in itself has no authority; it is purely abstract, and it is itself inert. It has no authority because in itself it has no power. (vii) Power is something you take for yourself, authority is given to you. Reply: To exercise your authority you are nevertheless exercising influence, i.e. affecting people's behaviour, which amounts to a form of power. ...read more.


You might think their decisions misguided, but, in so far as they exercise authority over you, you defer to their judgement. There can be many reasons for deferring to someone else's judgement, including persuasion (whether it is rational or non-rational persuasion), subconscious influence, or just a feeling of trust, or perhaps even by brute coercion. In other words, there may be specific forms of power behind authority. There is still a distinction between exercising a specific form of power directly, and exercising power via exercising authority, i.e. via getting someone to accept, or defer to, your judgement. Of course, many cases of authority involve power as well. For example, we might conform to a "No skating" sign partly because we respect the authorities' judgement that it is dangerous, and partly because we know there's a risk of a hefty fine. On the other hand, one feature of the "power = authority" view remains, namely that there is no intrinsic legitimacy to authority. The notion involves no built-in rightness about it. Just like exercising specific forms of power, getting someone to accept your authority (getting them to defer to your judgement) may or may not be justified. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. What are the limitations on our personal liberty? Are all of them justified?

    However this cannot be extended to when he is at work and he needs a 'clear mind' in order to judge situations in which other people rely on him. This can also be extended to people driving whilst intoxicated. Therefore according to the harm principle drug and drink driving laws are justified.

  2. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    The philosopher's knowledge of the Forms would include knowledge of the Form of Good, which is the 'keystone of the system', and therefore is essential for order. If one takes the Forms to be a true (or even just realistic)

  1. Ensayo de teoria de conocimiento

    Buscas acerca de las cosas nuevas y encuentras otras. A la larga solo notas que hay muchas cosas por seguir investigando y descubriendo. Por consiguiente, �nicamente apreciamos lo ignorantes que somos en realidad. Para reafirmar dicha afirmaci�n, donde se aumenta la ignorancia al ampliar el conocimiento, �sta debe ser metaf�ricamente

  2. Can a computer think? Really think?

    It would take him years to answer a question, if he could do it at all. In effect, Searle is postulating mental processes slowed down by a factor of millions, so no wonder it looks different. Searle's reply-that he could memorize the slips of paper and shuffle them in his head-sounds plausible enough.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work