• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is meant by Meta Ethics? Meta ethics helps to establish what constitutes good or bad moral or ethical behaviour.

Extracts from this document...


Religious Studies What is meant by Meta Ethics? Meta ethics helps to establish what constitutes good or bad moral or ethical behaviour. It examines what we mean when we talk about things that are good, bad, right, wrong, moral and immoral. Meta ethics is not trying to show something is wrong or right but only to examine the way in which the normative moral arguments have been presented. There are practically 4 theories to Meta ethics, each by separate scholars or philosophers. The first is by G.E. Moore and his theory of intuitionism. He is most famous for his theory of 'good' and was interested in making ethics a science. In his published work Principia Ethica he agued that that term goodness was indefinable because every individual's definition of the term was different. The term can be identified what it was but not defined. Intuitionism is fundamental moral principles which cannot be proven but are recognised in cognitive thoughts. ...read more.


Emotivism is based on people's emotive response to other people, events, situations, viewpoints and principles; this means they are interested in how people feel about a particular thing. The scholar of emotivism is C.L. Stevenson says that with emotivism even if the individual supports their perspective with statements for instance saying 'abortion is wrong' then the statement that god only has the right to give and take away life is still only finding reasons to back up their emotive response. Once all the arguments have been removed from the statement then all that is left is that individuals feelings and viewpoint which have no real substance to them because they cannot be argued against. A theory in emotivism is the boo-hurray theory. This is a statement which is followed with a response in which the individual approves or disapproves of the statement. Both of the individuals could inevitably want the same thing but the process could be different based on the attitudes and beliefs of the individuals. ...read more.


This suggests that moral statements are not commands like those suggested in emotivism but recommendations or guidelines to living in a civilised society. These rules need to be universal so that everyone can live by them and the prescribed action can also be taken to those who break those rules. Some statements do not have to be true or false but are prescribed an action to being accepted or rejected. Meta ethics deals with a wide range of theories which initially means that it cannot be simplified into saying that it only deals with the moral language of right, wrong etc but supports the statements of which arguments are formed which now can be objectively argued with evidence to back it up. Some parts of meta ethics show that moral statements are only ones of personal views therefore they cannot be generalised but from theories like prescriptivism we know that the course of action may be different but the attitudes and beliefs of the end results could be the same. Candice Burton 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    this kidney, because the two things are so different - who can say that a certain amount of money would be just compensation for a body part? We cannot deduct the value of an organ, as its value is subjective according to how much someone is willing to pay for it.

  2. What are the strengths and weaknesses of Intuitionism? Evaluate the merits or otherwise of ...

    Also, if everyone operates morally solely on their emotions then there should never be the problem of what to do, they would simply follow their strongest feeling on the issue. However, reality is different. For example; I may have huge sympathy for an elderly patient in pain, imploring me as her doctor to put her out of her misery.

  1. Kant's theory of Ethics

    So, what if the shopkeeper does not cheat her customers simply because she likes them too much? Kant would argue that although this a nice thought it would still not be a morally praiseworthy action because the shopkeeper is only doing what she likes doing.

  2. Critically examine what is meant by natural moral law.

    An apparent good can pervert reason. For instance, one may feel good taking drugs and drinking heavily but really it is self destructive and perverted from reason, which tells us that it is not good to take drugs or drink heavily.

  1. history of philosophy and ethics

    Normative ethics is the study of ethical norms - moral standards that tell us how to judge right from wrong, or good from bad, and how to live moral lives. This may involve articulating the character or good habits that we should acquire, the duties that we should follow, or the consequences of our actions on ourselves and others.

  2. Analyse the arguments which philosophers use to claim that ethical language is not meaningful ...

    It is notorious that adherents of such theories offer lists which differ in substance from each other" (MacIntyre 2002, 225). Absolutist definitions of right are refuted when we see that what may be seen to be right to one man on the basis of his intuition may contradict the conclusion of another on the basis of their intuition.

  1. Explain the importance of good will in Kant's ethical theory.

    Egoistic actions, such as kill oneself due to suffering or poor quality of life, goes against benevolence. Kant would be against euthanasia in terms that it cannot be universalised, saying that everyone in suffering should take the option of death.

  2. How are religious and ethical principles used in the abortion debate?

    Although the religious response of the sanctity of life principle prohibits abortion as the foetus is presumed to be a person, in the secular world a major issue lies in whether ethical status and moral worth can be extended to a premature being such as a foetus.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work