• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is meant by Meta Ethics? Meta ethics helps to establish what constitutes good or bad moral or ethical behaviour.

Extracts from this document...


Religious Studies What is meant by Meta Ethics? Meta ethics helps to establish what constitutes good or bad moral or ethical behaviour. It examines what we mean when we talk about things that are good, bad, right, wrong, moral and immoral. Meta ethics is not trying to show something is wrong or right but only to examine the way in which the normative moral arguments have been presented. There are practically 4 theories to Meta ethics, each by separate scholars or philosophers. The first is by G.E. Moore and his theory of intuitionism. He is most famous for his theory of 'good' and was interested in making ethics a science. In his published work Principia Ethica he agued that that term goodness was indefinable because every individual's definition of the term was different. The term can be identified what it was but not defined. Intuitionism is fundamental moral principles which cannot be proven but are recognised in cognitive thoughts. ...read more.


Emotivism is based on people's emotive response to other people, events, situations, viewpoints and principles; this means they are interested in how people feel about a particular thing. The scholar of emotivism is C.L. Stevenson says that with emotivism even if the individual supports their perspective with statements for instance saying 'abortion is wrong' then the statement that god only has the right to give and take away life is still only finding reasons to back up their emotive response. Once all the arguments have been removed from the statement then all that is left is that individuals feelings and viewpoint which have no real substance to them because they cannot be argued against. A theory in emotivism is the boo-hurray theory. This is a statement which is followed with a response in which the individual approves or disapproves of the statement. Both of the individuals could inevitably want the same thing but the process could be different based on the attitudes and beliefs of the individuals. ...read more.


This suggests that moral statements are not commands like those suggested in emotivism but recommendations or guidelines to living in a civilised society. These rules need to be universal so that everyone can live by them and the prescribed action can also be taken to those who break those rules. Some statements do not have to be true or false but are prescribed an action to being accepted or rejected. Meta ethics deals with a wide range of theories which initially means that it cannot be simplified into saying that it only deals with the moral language of right, wrong etc but supports the statements of which arguments are formed which now can be objectively argued with evidence to back it up. Some parts of meta ethics show that moral statements are only ones of personal views therefore they cannot be generalised but from theories like prescriptivism we know that the course of action may be different but the attitudes and beliefs of the end results could be the same. Candice Burton 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Virtue ethics is of little use when dealing with practical ethics Discuss.

    It does not give concrete answers and says it is a matter of practical wisdom. He would agree that virtue ethics is of little use when dealing with practical ethics. Michael Slote describes virtue ethics as being mostly based on our common sense ideas and intuitions about what counts as

  2. Explain why there maybe problems about the meaning of ethical language

    The 'is-ought' debate proves to be a problem for ethical language because many philosophers have moved form an 'is' to an ought within their arguments, and if it is not possible to do so then it weakens their arguments. A further problem that has arisen about the meaning of ethical language has come from the logical positivists.

  1. Religious Studies - Ethics: Natural Moral Law

    Furthermore, if one considers the possibility that homosexuality may derive from genetic traits, and therefore be a part of someone's nature, the final cause of reproduction has no basis. If this were the case, it could be said that sexual intercourse has as its purpose recreation and not reproduction.

  2. Situation ethics

    The necessity to accept the premise of acting in love by faith rather than by reason; 4) The desire to put people, not laws, first.

  1. Medical Ethics And Organ Transplants

    especially when looking at revealed ethics which as two very opposing sides and looking at life as sacred. Another key principle when discussing Medical ethics and organ transplantation is Person hood. It asks the question ?what is a person? (John Wyatt).

  2. Religious and/or moral principles are a hindrance with medical ethics. Examine and comment on ...

    She uses the literary technique of analogy which is a way of portraying the importance and severity of a topic. Her analogy looks a woman who is connected up to a famous violinist. The violinist is connected through the circulatory system and must stay connected to the woman to survive.

  1. How are religious and ethical principles used in the abortion debate?

    comparison of being alive to being dead: 'Death is not an event in life: we do not live to experience death.' Glover's views may seem extremely controversial, but it is reasonable to question what it is about life which is regarded as valuable, rather than singularly regarding all human life as sacred, as the religious treatment of the principle does.

  2. Natural Moral Law - in theory and in practice.

    There are no guidelines for judging these situations except by advising the use of reason. It is assumed that the theory is accessible to all because we have the ability to reason however is not the case for those who are mentally disabled.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work