• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is meant by the term miracle and examine and comment on the view that arguments against miracles are stronger than those arguments in support of them.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What is meant by the term "miracle" and examine and comment on the view that arguments against miracles are stronger than those arguments in support of them. Paul Tilich describes a miracle as "An event which is astonishing, unusual, shaking, without contradicting the rational structure of reality ... an even which points to the mystery of being" Miracles are a religious term, they are divine acts of God, and can be explained in no other way, a miracle must contain three basic attributes: The experience must be against regular experience or "break the laws of nature"; the event has purpose and meaning; it is possible to ascribe religious significance to the event. Thomas Aquinas suggested that miracles were "those things ... which as done by divine power apart from the order generally followed in things" He proposed three categories of miracles: Events done by God which nature could never do; Events that God can do and nature could do but not in that order; Events done by God that nature can do but God does without the use of natural laws. ...read more.

Middle

Some may call this a miracle; others may call it a coincidence. The only problem with Holland's suggestion is that it makes a miracle based on the subjective views of the witness. I will also look at the significance of Miracles in a religious context. Richard Swinburne says "If a God intervened in the natural order to make a feather land here rather than there for no deep, ultimate purpose, or to upset a child's box of toys just for spite, these events would not naturally be described as miracles" Although many miracles seem to be without purpose, like the liquefying of the blood of St Januarius. Or the statues of the Hindu Gods drinking milk seen al over India, this is a pointless miracle. John Locke argued that the definition of a miracle must be seen in a broader context of who performs it and who sees it; he said that a person must be acknowledgeable by God, and that the messenger should have come from God. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thirdly he observed miracle stories to some from unreliable sources, most coming from religious believers and the bible alike. Hardly unbiased sources and therefore not reliable sources for a just argument. Lastly we can see his last view through Illiyaas Ali's view of an inconsistent triad. This works of a basis of looking at the possibilities of miracles, it says that either: miracles occur; miracles are claimed in all religions and religions clam exclusively. Neither can occur without the contraries being incorrect. There has been much criticism over Hume's observations. We can judge Hume's description of natural laws, as they are still being understood, so, with all today's scientific advances, how can we judge what goes against natural laws or not? Next we can look at the language that Hume uses, his argument is open to widely differing interpretations, he seems to suggest that the improbability of an event leads to the logical conclusion that it did not happen. But some would say that this very improbability makes it even more believable than God willed it so. He also does not say what constitutes to a valid amount of witnesses to a miracle. ?? ?? ?? ?? Roshan Ratnayaka ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast arguments for and against belief in life after death.

    If a person was born with a terminal illness it would not seem just for them to be resurrected as a person with such an astounding deficiency, yet would they not so, it would not be truly them. The only plausible way around this would be to resort to a dualist style of argument separating the body from the soul.

  2. Assess Humes reasons for rejecting miracles

    unvarying, as he believed them to be "corrigible" due the possibility new discoveries and observations about the world could result in them being altered in some way. Additionally Swinburne disagrees with Hume's idea of what an improbable event is. Whilst for Hume this means an event which it would be

  1. Analyse the key strengths for the arguments of the existence of God based on ...

    If this premise is open to misapprehension therefore, the second is even more ambiguous as an experience of the divine faces more uncertainty. In summary, the argument only indicates a "probable" reality of God. In retaliation to this, the thesis of Ockham's razor may be implied whereby the simplest answer

  2. Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    Freud believed that religious experience is perfectly compatible with psychology, as it was a result of two parts of the human mind. First the deep despair and feeling of lack of control in the world; and second the infantile faith and responsibility placed in the father figure as a child.

  1. What are Mill’s four main arguments in defence of freedom of speech?

    He lists a number of rules of conduct and maxims laid down in both the Old and New Testaments to which Christians nominally subscribed, such as the blessedness of the poor and loving thy neighbour, the obvious inference being that these were uniformly believed and uniformly brought little or no action on the part of the believer.

  2. Examine and Comment on a philosophical analysis of religious experience

    SWINBURNE observes "If there is a God, one might expect him to make his presence known to man, not merely through the overall pattern of the universe in which he has placed them, but by dealing more intimately and personally with them."4 I would argue that if we accept SWINBURNE's

  1. Philosophers Views on Miracles Essay

    Nature can bring about a spontaneous remission or recovery, but we would not expect this o happen and if it does then it may attribute to the direct intervention by God. Finally, he defined as miracles those things done by God that nature could not do, but that God did without using the forces of nature.

  2. Explain what a study of Religious Experience may reveal about the nature of God. ...

    The world is what we experience it to be. We have to accept our senses. God is creator who gave mankind their five senses and created man in His own image. . ?So God created man in his own image...? (Genesis). Humans rely and trust their five senses. He gave man freewill in choosing whether to believe in God through His signs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work